Iran Economy NewsUS: Iran 'not open for business'

US: Iran ‘not open for business’


AFP: US officials declared Tuesday that Iran is “not open for business” and vowed to scrutinize companies heading to the Islamic republic since it entered a temporary nuclear agreement.


By Shaun Tandon

Washington (AFP) — US officials declared Tuesday that Iran is “not open for business” and vowed to scrutinize companies heading to the Islamic republic since it entered a temporary nuclear agreement.

Testifying before skeptical lawmakers, President Barack Obama’s administration detailed initial sanctions relief to Iran, including the transfer of $550 million in frozen oil revenues as part of a six-month nuclear agreement.

But Wendy Sherman, who is spearheading the diplomacy with Tehran, said that the United States was warning the growing number of business delegations traveling to Iran that sweeping sanctions remained in place.

“Tehran is not open for business because our sanctions relief is quite temporary, quite limited and quite targeted,” Sherman, the under secretary of state for political affairs, told the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.

“It doesn’t matter whether the countries are friend or foe — if they evade our sanctions, we will sanction them,” she said.

Sherman said that Secretary of State John Kerry spoke to Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius about a major French delegation that is visiting Tehran, telling him that the trip — while from the private sector — was “not helpful” in sending the message that “it is not business as usual.”

The delegation from the French employers’ union Medef is the largest from Europe since the November nuclear accord and includes representatives from major companies such as Total, Lafarge and Peugeot.

Addressing the delegation, Deputy Oil Minister Ali Majedi encouraged foreign companies to return.

David Cohen, the Treasury Department official in charge of the sanctions, acknowledged “a slight uptick” in Iran’s economic indicators but said that the United States would “vigorously” enforce sanctions.

“The Iranian economy is operating at significantly reduced levels and will continue to massively underperform for the foreseeable future,” Cohen said.

The November agreement between Iran and six powers — Britain, China, France, Germany, Russia and the United States — required Tehran to scale back its nuclear activities in return for the limited sanctions relief.

The Obama administration has presented the deal as a way to a peaceful solution to address longstanding concerns with Iran but has said that it is not taking for granted that diplomacy will succeed.

Iran insists that its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes. The clerical regime has particularly tense relations with Israel, whose Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has criticized the negotiated deal.

The US Congress, where support for Israel runs deep, has looked at ramping up sanctions on Iran despite the accord, but Obama has threatened to veto any bid to derail the ongoing diplomacy.

Senator Robert Menendez, chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee who has distanced himself from fellow Democrat Obama on Iran, demanded that any final deal with Tehran include the dismantling of “large portions of its nuclear infrastructure.”

“We have placed our incredibly effective international sanctions regime on the line without clearly defining the parameters of what we expect in a final agreement,” Menendez said.

Senator Jim Risch, a Republican, said that he was “disgusted” by the diplomatic effort.

“I hope you will prove me dead wrong, but I don’t think (you) will, given the history of these people,” Risch said of Iran as he criticized its imprisonment of at least two US citizens.

But Senator Tim Kaine, a Democrat, said that sanctions brought Iran to negotiations, and it was now important to try “aggressive diplomacy.”

Sanctions have “crippled the economy, but if anything it has also, by making Iran isolated, accelerated their path to try to develop nuclear technology for whatever purpose,” Kaine said.

“So if we’re going to stop that nuclear program and that quest for nuclear weapons, we have to either do it diplomatically or do it militarily,” he said.

Kaine warned that he would support war if Iran pursued a nuclear weapon despite the deal.

“We may have to undertake that significant step, but we shouldn’t do it if we leave diplomatic avenues unexplored,” he said.

Latest news

What Is Happening in Iran?

Following the brutal killing of Masha Amini, the Iranian people have once again united to fight and defeat the...

Iran Regime’s Ministry of Culture’s Decision To Eliminate Children’s Intellectual Centers

With the so-called ‘Cultural Revolution’ which took place between 1980 and 1983, the Iranian regime tried to purge the...

Water Shortage Crisis and the Destruction of Iran’s Water Resources

Iran is currently suffering from a number of dangerous natural disasters. One of the most worrying is the drying...

Economic Freedom Under the Rule of the Mullahs in Iran

The Fraser institute published its annual report of the index of economic freedom on September 8, which measured the...

Iran’s Regime Continues Its Internet Restriction Project

This is part of the outlook of a document by the Iranian regime’s Supreme Council of Cyberspace, which has...

Iran’s Human Development Index Dropped Sharply

One of the most common questions asked in primary schools by teachers all over the world is, “wealth or...

Must read

Package of terms (no sanctions included) for Iran

New York Times: The United States, Russia, China and...

U.S. investigates abduction of Iranian dissidents in Iraq

Iran Focus and agencies: London, Aug. 15 - The...

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you