News On Iran & Its NeighboursIraqCongress needs to demand a plan

Congress needs to demand a plan


New York Times: The strategy we should have had for Iraq was to slowly transition from military presence by building Iraqi capacity to maintain security and grow political institutions that would frame and ensure representative governance in Iraq. President Obama’s rush to the exits precludes that outcome.

Kori Schake

The New York Times

The strategy we should have had for Iraq was to slowly transition from military presence by building Iraqi capacity to maintain security and grow political institutions that would frame and ensure representative governance in Iraq. President Obama’s rush to the exits precludes that outcome. The arbitrary timelines for withdrawal coupled with desultory political engagement produced a predictable Iraqi political crisis. Politics at their highest level have seized up and are fracturing along sectarian lines, an occurrence precipitated and taken advantage of by Prime Minister Nuri Kamal al-Maliki.

This is not what Iraqis wanted, not what they voted for. The political culture of Iraq was trending toward trust beyond sectarian lines, political leaders seeing electoral benefit in reaching across religious communities and emphasizing the achievements of governing.

For the Obama administration, the exit is the strategy for Iraq. What can be done within the political, economic, diplomatic and military parameters set by the administration’s disinterest? First, we must stop turning a blind eye to Prime Minister Maliki’s creeping authoritarianism. Maliki returned from his White House meeting declaring the end of the war and issued an arrest warrant for his vice president. The White House was silent, as it has been on Maliki’s earlier unconstitutional arrogation of power and political machinations, such as arresting hundreds of Sunnis and striking candidates from electoral lists. While it is probably too much to expect the Obama administration to vigorously contest what is occurring in Iraq’s internal politics, we ought at least to bear witness. We have no less responsibility in Iraq — more, in fact — than in other countries where leaders abuse power to the detriment of their population.

Second, our strategy now should be to engage vigorously and broadly to build civil society. Within current constraints, we probably cannot affect the choices of current political leaders. But we can, and are traditionally good at, growing leaders with greater commitment to the principles of democratic governance and helping construct institutions that bound the range of any individual leader’s reach. Iraq desperately needs help shoring up the independence of its judiciary, the transparency of its electoral system and the accountability of the leadership.

Third, we need to explain ourselves better, more often, and more publicly to reduce continuing Iraqi suspicion. The 16,000 contractors providing security and support to the U.S. mission, recent revelations about drone aircraft operated by contractors, and the not uncommon conspiracy-mindedness of societies emerging out of decades of authoritarianism have caused some Iraqi members of Parliament to consider the civilian mission a new colonialism. We need to dispel that notion, and quickly, if we are to sustain the basis for meaningful engagement inside Iraq.

Fourth, we should expend much more effort bringing Iraq into our regional relationships. Other Middle Eastern states remain hostile to Iraq, for a variety of reasons: historical grievance, sectarian suspicion, concern about collusion between Iraq and Iran, Prime Minister Maliki’s refusal to support Arab League sanctions on Syria. We have done too little to kluge together countries in the region in ways that will reduce Iraq’s uniqueness and Iraqis’ concern about our role in their country and in the region.

Congress should demand that the administration produce a plan with measurable objectives for what our mission in Iraq will achieve. We hold our military to that standard, and we should expect the same of our diplomats. Our civilian mission in Iraq is operating at a handicap because of the president’s policies, but that is no excuse for not achieving a broad-based relationship with Iraqis that will hold their government accountable and foster the institutions and practices of representative government.


Kori Schake is a research fellow at the Hoover Institution. She has worked in the Pentagon, the National Security Council and the State Department, and is the author of a forthcoming book about the State Department, “State of Disrepair.”

Latest news

What Is Happening in Iran?

Following the brutal killing of Masha Amini, the Iranian people have once again united to fight and defeat the...

Iran Regime’s Ministry of Culture’s Decision To Eliminate Children’s Intellectual Centers

With the so-called ‘Cultural Revolution’ which took place between 1980 and 1983, the Iranian regime tried to purge the...

Water Shortage Crisis and the Destruction of Iran’s Water Resources

Iran is currently suffering from a number of dangerous natural disasters. One of the most worrying is the drying...

Economic Freedom Under the Rule of the Mullahs in Iran

The Fraser institute published its annual report of the index of economic freedom on September 8, which measured the...

Iran’s Regime Continues Its Internet Restriction Project

This is part of the outlook of a document by the Iranian regime’s Supreme Council of Cyberspace, which has...

Iran’s Human Development Index Dropped Sharply

One of the most common questions asked in primary schools by teachers all over the world is, “wealth or...

Must read

Iran seizes 3 Finns in Persian Gulf

AP: Iran has detained three Finns for allegedly straying...

Iran is behind the Badr Brigade in Iraq – report

Iran Focus: London, Nov. 17 – The Badr Brigade...

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you