New York Times: Two years ago, foreign engineers built a new highway through the desert of western Afghanistan, past this ancient trading post and on to the outside world. Nearby, they strung a high-voltage power line and laid a fiber-optic cable, marked with red posts, that provides telephone and Internet access to the region. The New York Times
By DAVID ROHDE
Published: December 27, 2006
ISLAM QALA, Afghanistan Two years ago, foreign engineers built a new highway through the desert of western Afghanistan, past this ancient trading post and on to the outside world. Nearby, they strung a high-voltage power line and laid a fiber-optic cable, marked with red posts, that provides telephone and Internet access to the region.
The modernization comes with a message. Every 5 to 10 miles, road signs offer quotations from the Koran. “Forgive us, God,” declares one. “God is clear to everyone,” says another. A graceful mosque rises roadside, with a green glass dome and Koranic inscriptions in blue tile. The style is unmistakably Iranian.
All of this is fruit of Iran’s drive to become a bigger player in Afghanistan, as it exploits new opportunities to spread its influence and ideas farther across the Middle East.
The rise of Hezbollah, with Iran’s support, has demonstrated the extent of Tehran’s sway in Lebanon, and the American toppling of Saddam Hussein has allowed it to expand its influence in Iraq. Iran has been making inroads into Afghanistan, as well. During the tumultuous 1980s and ’90s, Iran shipped money and arms to groups fighting first the Soviet occupation and later the Taliban government. But since the United States and its allies ousted the Taliban in 2001, Iran has taken advantage of the central government’s weakness to pursue a more nuanced strategy: part reconstruction, part education and part propaganda.
Iran has distributed its largess, more than $200 million in all, mostly here in the west but also in the capital, Kabul. It has set up border posts against the heroin trade, and next year will begin work on new road and construction projects and a rail line linking the countries. In Kabul, its projects include a new medical center and a water testing laboratory.
Iran’s ambassador, Muhammad Reza Bahrami, portrayed his government’s activities as neighborly good works, with a certain self-interest. Iran, he said, is eager to avoid repeating the calamities of the last 20 years, when two million Afghan refugees streamed over the border.
“Our strategy in Afghanistan is based on security, stability and de veloping a strong central government,” he said. “It not only benefits the Afghan people, it’s in our national interest.”
Still, there are indications of other motives. Iranian radio stations are broadcasting anti-American propaganda into Afghanistan. Moderate Shiite leaders in Afghanistan say Tehran is funneling money to conservative Shiite religious schools and former warlords with longstanding ties to Iranian intelligence agencies.
And as the dispute over Iran’s nuclear program has escalated [leading the United Nations Security Council to impose sanctions on Iran on Dec. 23″>, Iranian intelligence activity has increased across Afghanistan, American and Afghan officials say. This has included not just surveillance and information collection but the recruitment of a network of pro-Iranian operatives who could attack American targets in Afghanistan. [On Dec. 20 in London, British officials charged the interpreter for NATO’s commanding general in Afghanistan with passing secrets to Iran.”>
Discerning Iranian motives is notoriously difficult. Government factions often have competing agendas. Even so, the question of Iran’s intentions in Afghanistan has come under a microscope in recent weeks amid debate in Washington over whether the United States should begin dealing with Tehran as part of a possible solution in Iraq. Some American officials have suggested that Iran’s seeming cooperation in Afghanistan may be something of a model for Iraq.
So far, even as it declines to talk with the Iranians about Iraq, the Bush administration has adopted a posture of uneasy detente over Afghanistan. American officials say that they are watching closely, and no evidence has emerged of recent arms shipments to Iranian proxies, as there have been in Iraq, or of other efforts to destabilize the country. Iran’s Shiite leaders appear to be maintaining their historic opposition to the Sunni Taliban, who consider Shiites heretics. Iran, they also say, is failing to gain popular support among Afghans, 80 percent of whom are Sunni Muslims.
Of far greater concern, according to American, European and Afghan officials, is Pakistan, America’s ostensible ally against terrorism. They say the Pakistanis have allowed the Taliban to create a virtual ministate and staging base for suicide attacks just across Afghanistan’s eastern border. Suicide attacks have quintupled, from 23 in 2005 to 115 this year, killing more than 200 Afghan civilians.
[It is too early to know if the Bush administration’s position will be at all affected by the latest source of tension between Washington and Tehran – the American arrests of several Iranians in Baghdad on Dec. 20 and 21 on suspicion of conducting attacks on Iraqi security forces.”>
Western diplomats say that, at the very least, Iran’s goals in Afghanistan are to hasten the withdrawal of American troops, prevent the Taliban from regaining power and keep the Afghan west firmly under Tehran’s sway.
“Keep this area stable, but make it friendly for them,” said a senior European diplomat in western Afghanistan. “Make it difficult for outsiders to operate here.”
Afghanistan, analysts say, is one example of the way Iran is increasingly spending its oil money in a variety of countries to realize its self-image as an ascendant regional power. One Western official said that by focusing on high-profile construction projects, diplomacy and public relations, Iran was, in effect, employing American cold-war tactics to increase its soft power in the region.
In Iraq, that means not just financing an array of Shiite political parties and militias; the Iranian ambassador in Baghdad, Hassan Kazemi-Qomi, said Tehran was already providing power and planned to build three hospitals and set up a $1 billion loan fund for Iraqi businesses. Similarly, Iran gave Hezbollah not just weapons and training but also the money for roads, schools and social services that made it the de facto government in southern Lebanon. Iran already has a strong and growing presence in Syria, too.
Iranian officials cast themselves as a counterweight to the United States, which they say has mishandled opportunities to stabilize both Afghanistan and Iraq.
“U.S. policies, particularly under the current administration, have created a huge amount of resentment around the world,” said a senior Iranian official, who requested anonymity because he was not authorized to comment publicly. “I’m not saying Iran is gaining power all over the world. I’m saying the U.S. is losing it fast.”
A History of Intervention
Afghanistan, a fragile mosaic of ethnic and religious groups, has long been susceptible to intervention from more powerful neighbors. As the world’s largest predominantly Shiite country, Iran is the traditional foreign backer of Afghanistan’s Shiites, roughly 20 percent of the country’s population.
During the anti-Soviet jihad of the 1980s, Iranian Revolutionary Guards financed and trained fundamentalist Shiite militias, as well as Sunni fighters. In the civil war after the Russian withdrawal in 1989, Iran became a patron of the Northern Alliance, while Pakistan supported the ultimately victorious Taliban.
When the Taliban were ousted in 2001, Iran promised to help stabilize Afghanistan. In Germany that December, it was Iranian diplomats who stepped in to save foundering talks to form a new Afghan government, persuading the Northern Alliance to accept the agreement. Soon after, Iran pledged $560 million in aid and loans to Afghanistan over five years, a “startling” amount for a nonindustrialized nation, according to James Dobbins, the senior American envoy to Afghanistan at the time.
A week later, President Bush situated Iran on the “axis of evil.” But even as they assailed that characterization, Mr. Dobbins said, Iranian officials privately offered to train Afghan soldiers. The Bush administration rejected the offer.
Today, the American training and reconstruction effort dwarfs Iran’s. The United States has spent a total of $4.5 billion since 2001, according to Afghan officials. But while the United States has built more than 1,000 schools, government buildings and clinics, and paved more than 730 miles of roads, a 2005 government audit found that reconstruction had been slowed by inconsistent financing, staff shortages and poor oversight. Amid rising Taliban attacks and public perception of corruption in the government of President Hamid Karzai, recent opinion polls show optimism declining across the country.
Iranian officials said they had focused on roads and power as a quick way to strengthen Afghanistan’s economy. A major project has involved upgrading roads linking Afghanistan with the Iranian port of Chabahar, on the Gulf of Oman.
In many ways, Muhammad Reza Dabbaghi embodies Iran’s new approach in Afghanistan. Mr. Dabbaghi, a 46-year-old engineer, is the top executive here for the Iranian company that built the new 70-mile highway linking western Afghanistan to Iran two years ago, is paving much of the northwestern city of Herat and hopes to build the new railway, all with Iranian government financing.
As his staff served green tea, apples and sweet cookies from southeastern Iran, he handed over a glossy color brochure and CD-ROM touting his company’s work. Mr. Dabbaghi, a fastidious man in a stylish blazer and slacks, said his company was trying to work in neighboring countries, but he complained that the United States was spreading “mass propaganda,” lobbying governments not to hire Iranian companies, especially in Afghanistan.
In Kabul, American contractors, advisers and aid projects clearly dominate the city, but Iran is there, too. In addition to a handful of Iranian advisers at government ministries, Iranian experts have trained more than 1,200 Afghan teachers, librarians and diplomats.
Last year, the Iranian Embassy opened the Iranian Corner, a room in Kabul University’s main library filled with computers, books and magazines from Iran, promoting Iran’s ancient culture and modern achievements. Librarians say it is more popular than the adjoining American Corner, sponsored by the United States Embassy, primarily because it has a better Internet connection. Unlike in Iran, where the government blocks thousands of Web sites, the Iranian Corner offers open Internet access.
Afghanistan’s economic reliance on Iran has increased in another way, as Taliban attacks have slowed the economy. Each morning, hundreds of Afghan men line up outside the Iranian missions in Herat and Kabul for visas to work in Iran. Iranian officials said they expected to issue up to 450,000 visas to Afghans this year, nearly twice the 250,000 issued in 2005.
Signs of Influence
In the murky world of western Afghanistan, centuries of Iranian influence have left many local people with a perception of Iran as all-powerful nemesis. Many said their lives would be in danger if they publicly criticized Iran or its Afghan proxies. Behind every suspicious event in the Afghan west, they contend, lies an Iranian hand.
Such accounts are clearly exaggerated. Still, Western and Afghan officials say that, beyond its much-trumpeted reconstruction program, Iran is also engaging in a range of activities it is less eager to publicize.
Qari Ahmad Ali, a Shiite commander once backed by Iran, said that since 2001, his former patrons had funneled millions of dollars to a web of Shiite religious schools and charities in western Afghanistan. He said the Sadaqia Madrasa, one of the largest Shiite religious schools in Herat, was at the center of an effort to spread Shiite fundamentalism.
“Iran does not have military activities,” Mr. Ali said. “They have political and social activities.”
Muhammad Siddique Tawakulay, the Sadaqia school’s cultural director, said it received no assistance from Iran. “We are saying the truth and the facts,” he said, before giving a tour of the school. But a second, unsupervised tour produced evidence of Iranian influence.
In a small ground-floor room, photos of Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, the leader of the Iranian revolution, were for sale. The main library had two dozen books published in Iran that criticized Israel and the United States. One, “Dark Star,” had a photo of a Hasidic Jew with a star of David burning ominously on its cover. A religious magazine printed in Iran assailed the United States for supporting Israel’s attacks on Lebanon last summer.
Shopkeepers said that during the Lebanon fighting, madrasa officials distributed posters praising Hezbollah. One of them, still hanging in a local shop, featured photographs of dead Lebanese children and a heroic image of the Hezbollah leader, Sheik Hassan Nasrallah.
A senior Afghan intelligence official said that Radio Mashhad, a state-run station in northeastern Iran’s largest city, broadcast anti-American messages over the border.
“Iran is providing a lot of assistance for religious and cultural activities in Afghanistan,” said the official, who spoke on condition of anonymity because of the secret nature of his work. “That is the easy way to build influence.”
Moderate Shiites agreed. “We worry about the situation,” said Abbas Noyan, a Shiite member of Parliament. “Right now, the Iranians have a strong hand.”
In interviews, three Shiite officials said new religious schools were being built with Iranian money. They also said that more Afghans were celebrating formerly obscure Shiite religious holidays.
Iran’s influence appeared to wane two years ago, after the United States doubled aid to Afghanistan and removed Ismail Khan, the governor of Herat and a powerful Iranian-backed warlord who dominated the west.
Since then, though, American troops have turned responsibility for Herat over to the Italians, and this year, the United States cut aid to Afghanistan by 30 percent. Iran, meanwhile, has kept its aid money flowing steadily and continued to back its proxies in the region, according to a Western diplomat.
The last known example of Iranian weapons shipments came in late 2004, when Tehran provided weapons and training to a junior commander loyal to Mr. Khan. Since then, the commander is suspected of having orchestrated a bombing and other incidents to pressure the Afghan government into reinstating Mr. Khan.
In February, Herat experienced its first religious violence in decades. Six people were killed as Sunnis and Shiites staged gun battles on city streets, according to religious leaders. Some local officials blamed Mr. Khan’s protégé for fomenting the violence. Others attributed it to rising grass-roots Sunni-Shiite tensions.
As in Iraq, the American-backed effort to build a democracy has fostered a Shiite revival here. Shiites now serve as governors in 4 of 34 provinces, including Herat. Hard-line Sunnis in Herat said they chafed at being ruled by Shiites, blamed Iran for the Shiite rise and expected more violence.
In Kabul, though, Afghan government officials, desperate for aid, say they have decided to trust Iran’s intentions.
“History may prove that overly optimistic,” said Jawed Ludin, President Karzai’s chief of staff. “But it is in our interests today to trust our Iranian neighbors and expect the same in return.”
Michael Moss contributed reporting from Baghdad, and Michael Slackman from Damascus.