Iran Nuclear NewsIsrael says Iran giving 'false explanations' to U.N. nuclear...

Israel says Iran giving ‘false explanations’ to U.N. nuclear inquiry


Reuters: Israel has condemned as unacceptably slow Iran’s cooperation with a U.N. watchdog inquiry into suspected nuclear bomb research and accused Tehran of providing “false” explanations for its disputed activities.


By Fredrik Dahl

VIENNA (Reuters) – Israel has condemned as unacceptably slow Iran’s cooperation with a U.N. watchdog inquiry into suspected nuclear bomb research and accused Tehran of providing “false” explanations for its disputed activities.

Iran, which says its nuclear programme is peaceful and that it is Israel’s assumed atomic arsenal that threatens Middle East peace, insisted there had been “steady and constant progress” in its cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency.

The contrasting statements by the two arch-enemies were made during a board meeting this week of the U.N. agency, where IAEA chief Yukiya Amano said Iran had finally begun to engage with an investigation into allegations that it has worked on designing a nuclear warhead, but that more was needed.

Western envoys cautiously welcomed Iran’s increased nuclear transparency, while also calling for Tehran to pick up the pace of its cooperation. But Israel’s ambassador suggested Iran was just trying to buy time while pressing on with its nuclear work.

Widely believed to be the Middle East’s only nuclear-armed power, Israel sees Iran’s atomic programme as a direct threat and has in the past warned it could carry out unilateral strikes on Iranian nuclear sites. Iran rejects accusations that it has been trying to develop a nuclear bomb capability.

“Iran continues to abuse what is termed as a ‘step-by-step’ approach to the resolution of outstanding issues,” Israeli Ambassador Merav Zafary-Odiz said, referring to a phased cooperation pact agreed in November between Iran and the IAEA.

“This pace of investigation is unacceptable … Iran will continue to provide false explanations and to hide the true nature of its activities,” she said, without giving details.

Because of a Jewish holiday, Zafary-Odiz did not deliver her statement during Wednesday’s IAEA board debate on Iran, but it was posted later on the United Nations agency’s web site.


Israel is also deeply sceptical of U.S.-led efforts to reach a final international accord to scale back a nuclear programme which Iran says is for energy purposes but the West fears may be a covert bid to develop the means and expertise to build bombs.

U.S. officials say it is vital for Iran to resolve the IAEA’s concerns if the parallel negotiations between Tehran and the United States, France, Germany, Britain, China and Russia on the long-term agreement to settle the dispute are to succeed.

Those talks aim to set verifiable, civilian limits to Iran’s nuclear programme and end punitive sanctions imposed on Tehran. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has complained that sanctions on Iran are being eased prematurely. Seeking to narrow big differences between Iran and the powers on what such a deal should look like, their experts were meeting in Vienna this week ahead of the next round of political level talks on June 16-20, also in the Austrian capital.

The sides aim to hammer out an agreement by a self-imposed July 20 deadline, although some diplomats and analysts say the talks will likely have to be extended.

The IAEA’s inquiry focuses specifically on what it calls the possible military dimensions of Iran’s atomic activities.

Iran says the accusations are baseless but has offered to address them since pragmatist Hassan Rouhani took office as Iranian president last year, partly on a platform to end the Islamic state’s international isolation.

“We do not recognise the … unsubstantiated allegations,” Iran’s ambassador to the IAEA, Reza Najafi, told the board in a statement made available to Reuters on Thursday. “However, we have already announced our readiness to cooperate with the IAEA on some of the ambiguities in order to clarify them.”

Last month, Iran gave the IAEA information requested in the inquiry as to its purpose in developing Exploding Bridge Wire (EBW) detonators, which can be used to set off an atomic explosive device. Iran says it was for civilian use.

In a meeting in Tehran on May 20, Iran also agreed to address two other areas of the investigation by Aug. 25.

Western governments regard Iran’s increased readiness to cooperate as positive but are likely to remain sceptical until it has cleared up all allegations of illicit atomic work.

(Editing by Mark Heinrich)

Latest news

Iran Regime’s Ministry of Culture’s Decision To Eliminate Children’s Intellectual Centers

With the so-called ‘Cultural Revolution’ which took place between 1980 and 1983, the Iranian regime tried to purge the...

Water Shortage Crisis and the Destruction of Iran’s Water Resources

Iran is currently suffering from a number of dangerous natural disasters. One of the most worrying is the drying...

Economic Freedom Under the Rule of the Mullahs in Iran

The Fraser institute published its annual report of the index of economic freedom on September 8, which measured the...

Iran’s Regime Continues Its Internet Restriction Project

This is part of the outlook of a document by the Iranian regime’s Supreme Council of Cyberspace, which has...

Iran’s Human Development Index Dropped Sharply

One of the most common questions asked in primary schools by teachers all over the world is, “wealth or...

Narcotics Iran Regime’s Income Source for Terrorism

Besides Iran’s malign activities, such as its regional interference, and missile and nuclear projects, drug trafficking plays a major...

Must read

Why Trump Had to Decertify the Iran Deal

Iran Focus London, 17 Oct - Investor Business Daily published...

Iran says would strike Israel, US navy if attacked

AFP: Iran would "set on fire" Israel and the...

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you