its uranium enrichment program, Tehran officials said Sunday. A spokesman also notched up the rhetorical battle with Washington, declaring that Iranians have the means to defend themselves should President Bush act on his warning that military force could be a final option if Iran doesn’t halt its nuclear program. Associated Press
By ALI AKBAR DAREINI
Associated Press Writer
A spokesman also notched up the rhetorical battle with Washington, declaring that Iranians have the means to defend themselves should President Bush act on his warning that military force could be a final option if Iran doesn’t halt its nuclear program.
The comments came as Iran’s new president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, nominated hard-liners for all his key ministries, signaling the likelihood of an intensified confrontation with the United States and Europe over the issue.
Iran already rejected Thursday’s resolution from the U.N. nuclear agency urging it to halt the conversion of uranium into gas at its atomic plant in Isfahan. Conversion is a step before enrichment, which produces material usable for both energy-producing reactor fuel and atomic bombs.
After the International Atomic Energy Agency’s board issued its appeal, diplomats familiar with the proceedings said Iran was being given until Sept. 3 to halt uranium conversion or risk being referred to the U.N. Security Council for consideration of sanctions.
Washington and others have long suspected Iran’s nuclear program is intended to develop weapons, and European governments grew concerned after it was revealed the Iranians had kept parts of its atomic operations hidden from U.N. inspectors.
Iran denies it is working on nuclear arms, saying the program’s sole purpose is to generate electricity. It insists it has a sovereign right under the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty to convert uranium at Isfahan and do enrichment at its plant in Natanz for peaceful activities.
“The Isfahan issue is over. What is left on the table for discussion is Natanz,” Mohammad Saeedi, deputy head of the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran, told state television.
“We definitely have plans for Natanz in the near future,” he added, although he did not give a time frame.
The Foreign Ministry’s spokesman, Hamid Reza Asefi, also said Iran would not stop uranium conversion.
“Work in Isfahan will not be suspended again for confidence building,” he said, referring to the suspension of nuclear activities that Iran imposed last year to allow negotiations with the European Union to proceed in a good atmosphere.
Asefi said at a news conference that Iran had no set plans for resuming uranium enrichment in Natanz. “Europe’s behavior will heavily influence the decision,” he said.
Iran’s chief delegate to the IAEA, Sirus Nasseri, indicated Thursday that any talks about enrichment would be about setting safeguards for operations at the Natanz facility to reassure those with suspicions but not about closing the plant.
The EU, lead by Britain, Germany and France, has been trying to persuade Iran to abandon its enrichment program in return for a supply of nuclear fuel to power reactors and other economic help.
Iran rejected the offer earlier this month, objecting to the Europeans’ insistence it give up its uranium conversion and enrichment programs. The IAEA then issued its warning.
On Friday, Bush said on Israeli television that efforts to shut down Iran’s atomic program should rely on diplomacy, but he also had a veiled warning for the Tehran regime.
If diplomacy fails “all options are on the table,” he said. “The use of force is the last option for any president. You know, we’ve used force in the recent past to secure our country.”
Asefi characterized the comment as part of Washington’s psychological war against Iran and said Iran had its own warning about any U.S. attack.
“I think Bush should know that our options are more numerous than the U.S. options,” Asefi said. “If the United States makes such a big mistake, then Iran will definitely have more choices to defend itself.”
He offered no specifics.
German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder said he hoped Iran would change its mind about its nuclear program, but added that he opposed any threats of military force.
“I see a military option a high-grade danger,” Schroeder said in an interview published Sunday by the Bild am Sonntag newspaper. “Therefore I can certainly rule out that a German government under my leadership would take part in one.”
He said Iran should be allowed to use nuclear energy for peaceful purposes, “but we must ensure that Iran is not put in the position to be able to manufacture atomic weapons.”
