Iran Nuclear NewsDiplomats: U.N. Lacks Right to Inspect Sites in Iran

Diplomats: U.N. Lacks Right to Inspect Sites in Iran

-

Reuters: Inspectors from the U.N. nuclear watchdog would like to visit a military complex in Iran that an exile group said housed a nuclear weapons site, but they lack the legal
authority to go there, U.N. diplomats said. Iran, which insists its nuclear program is solely for electricity generation, earlier this week escaped possible U.N. Security Council economic … Reuters

By Louis Charbonneau

VIENNA – Inspectors from the U.N. nuclear watchdog would like to visit a military complex in Iran that an exile group said housed a nuclear weapons site, but they lack the legal authority to go there, U.N. diplomats said.

Iran, which insists its nuclear program is solely for electricity generation, earlier this week escaped possible U.N. Security Council economic sanctions after agreeing to freeze all activities which could be used to make bomb-grade material.

But several military sites inspectors would like to inspect are legally off-limits to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), which only has clear rights to visit facilities declared to it as nuclear sites. Access to other facilities must be negotiated and can be highly problematic.

A group of Iranian exiles and Washington suspect there is secret atom bomb work at the Parchin military complex southeast of Tehran and Lavizan II in northeastern Tehran.

“The IAEA simply has no authority to go to sites that are not declared nuclear sites,” a diplomat close to the IAEA inspection process told Reuters.

He said the agency needed Iran’s permission to inspect undeclared sites. The IAEA had not asked to inspect Lavizan II, although it would like to.

IAEA spokesman Mark Gwozdecky declined to comment. “We are not commenting … as we do not conduct the inspections process through the media,” he said.

Last December, Iran signed the IAEA’s Additional Protocol, granting the agency more authority to conduct short-notice, intrusive inspections, but only to declared sites. Although the protocol has not been ratified, Tehran has been acting as if it was in force.

IAEA chief Mohamed ElBaradei has asked Iran many times for access to Parchin, but a November report by the IAEA said it had received no response from Tehran.

“DEPRESSING”

One U.N. diplomat described it as “depressing” that the National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI), an Iranian exile group with a history of revealing hidden nuclear sites in Iran, said recently that Lavizan II was a secret atomic weapons site and then days later reported it was being stripped clean.

“If a country has a strategy for hiding its nuclear program, then the Additional Protocol is of little use,” the U.N. diplomat said, adding that the IAEA would not have been able to prove that Libya had an atomic arms program if Muammar Gaddafi had not confessed and handed over his atom bomb designs.

He said if Iran was hiding a nuclear weapons program, as Washington believes, the IAEA would probably never find it without additional inspection authority.

The Western diplomat close to the IAEA said the suggestion that IAEA inspections were not working reminded him of U.S. accusations that inspections in pre-war Iraq were ineffective.

“The logic is similar to Iraq,” he said, adding that U.S. claims that Iraq had revived its covert atom bomb program were wrong. “Inspections worked in Iraq and they’re working in Iran.”

But in Iraq, U.N. inspectors were armed with a U.N. Security Council mandate that allowed them to go anywhere, any time.

Diplomats and weapons experts said the IAEA inspection process had been dealt a severe blow this week when France, Britain and Germany gave in to Iranian demands that a clause demanding Iran grant the IAEA “unrestricted access” to sites in Iran be removed from a draft resolution.

The resolution passed by the IAEA board only calls on Iran to grant access “in accordance with the Additional Protocol.”

“It was a terrible blow to this effort to find these potential nuclear weapons sites,” said David Albright, a former U.N. arms inspector and head of a Washington-based think-tank.

ElBaradei has said it could take at least two years to resolve all the issues surrounding Iran’s nuclear program, even if the country fully cooperates, because of the efforts it had gone to conceal its program for nearly two decades.

Latest news

Snapback Sanctions, a Must Response to Iran’s Human Rights Abuse and JCPOA Violations

The protests in Iran have been going on for more than two months, even though the regime is cracking...

Growing Disintegration Among Iran Regime’s Forces

Iran has been shaken by a wave of nationwide protests since mid-September. The trigger was the death of the...

Grim Tidings for Iran’s Regime After Approval of UN Fact-Finding Mission

After many discussions and debates, the United Nations Human Rights Council has approved a fact-finding mission to investigate the...

Iranian People’s Resistance Changed the Appeasement Policy

Soon after the new US government started its obligations in January 2021, hand in hand with the European governments...

Khamenei’s Disgraceful Campaign Against Piranshahr and Javanrud, Who Will Be the Loser?

On the 67th day of Iran’s revolution, the Iranian regime attempted to put a halt to the protests in...

Iran: Expensive Medicine, Cheap Human Life

A look at the equipment and weapons that the Iranian regime has been using against its people to suppress...

Must read

Iran dismisses U.S. concern over held Iranian-Americans

Reuters: Iran said on Tuesday it did not need...

US condemns stoning executions in Iran

AFP: The United States on Friday joined international condemnation...

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you