Iran Nuclear NewsIran hints at uranium plan changes

Iran hints at uranium plan changes

-

ImageNew York Times: A high-ranking Iranian official said Tuesday that even if the country agreed to a United Nations-sponsored plan to ship its enriched uranium abroad for further processing, it would not ship it all at once, Iranian news media reported. The New York Times

By ROBERT F. WORTH

ImageBEIRUT, Lebanon — A high-ranking Iranian official said Tuesday that even if the country agreed to a United Nations-sponsored plan to ship its enriched uranium abroad for further processing, it would not ship it all at once, Iranian news media reported.

That position, if maintained, could undermine the entire plan. The French government, a party to the deal, has made it clear that the uranium must be shipped all at once before the end of the year.

Iran has said it will formally respond on Friday to the proposal, which is intended to delay the country’s ability to produce a nuclear weapon for about a year and buy time for a broader diplomatic solution to the nuclear standoff.

On Tuesday, Alaeddin Borujerdi, the head of Parliament’s national security and foreign policy committee, said that if Iran agreed to ship its uranium abroad, to be further enriched for use to produce electricity, “this must not happen in one go,” and that the fuel must be shipped in installments, according to the semiofficial ISNA news agency.

Mr. Borujerdi also said “our basic opinion” was that Iran preferred to purchase processed nuclear fuel rather than send its uranium abroad for processing. Other officials have made similar comments in recent days, and the Iranian reaction so far appears to reflect Iran’s complex internal politics rather than any clear indication of what the decision will be. The supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, has final authority on state matters and often allows various high-ranking officials to express their views before making a decision.

Mr. Borujerdi’s comments might also be a trial balloon to discern Western responses to possible changes to the plan, analysts said.

United Nations inspectors are now in Iran, visiting a uranium enrichment site near the city of Qum, the existence of which was a state secret until September.

Under the plan, drafted by Iranian and Western negotiators in Vienna last week, Iran would ship 2,645 pounds of low-enriched uranium to Russia for further processing. That amount, representing most of the country’s known stockpile of low-enriched uranium, would take about a year to replace.

In the meantime, Iran would not have enough nuclear material to build a weapon, and there would be more time to prepare an international agreement on Iran’s nuclear ambitions. The uranium would be returned to Iran in the form of fuel rods, usable only in a civilian nuclear facility and not for weapons.

Some Iranian officials appear to fear that the plan could be a trap and that the fuel might not be returned. The proposal to ship it in installments might be an effort to alleviate that fear.

But American officials are equally concerned that the Iranians are planning to run out the clock and continue processing uranium so that they can either build a weapon or attain “breakout capacity,” the ability to build one within a few months. Some diplomats involved in the negotiations are also concerned that Iran may have more nuclear fuel in its stockpile than it has acknowledged, and may indeed already possess breakout capacity.

If Iran formally proposes to ship its uranium in installments, Western powers that brokered the proposed deal in Vienna are likely to balk, said Valerie Lincy, a senior researcher with the Wisconsin Project on Nuclear Arms Control, a Washington-based nonprofit group that works for arms limits.

“One of the problems would be that a part of the stockpile would remain in Iran, so the risk of breakout capacity would still be there,” Ms. Lincy said. Much would depend on how much low-enriched uranium remained in Iran, she added.

She also noted that Iran was continuing to produce low-enriched uranium, and could continue to do so rapidly even as it shipped almost equal amounts of fuel out in installments, making the deal largely meaningless.

Latest news

Iran’s Negative Economic Growth: From Statistical Manipulation to the Collapse of Investment

When the gap between official figures and reality becomes too wide, the economic crisis is no longer confined to...

Iraq Sets September 30 as Deadline for Disarmament of Iranian Regime-Backed Militia Groups

Iraqi government spokesperson Haider al-Aboudi announced on Monday, June 29, that the government has given Shiite armed groups backed...

Escalating Iran-US Conflict Cuts Strait of Hormuz Traffic, Lifts Oil Prices

Oil Prices Rise and Ship Traffic Through the Strait of Hormuz Declines Following Tensions Between Iran and the United...

The ‘No To Executions Tuesdays’ campaign has entered its 127th week

The campaign “No to Executions Tuesdays,” a prisoner-led protest against executions held across multiple prisons in Iran, entered its...

Sixty-two Members of the Iranian Regime’s Assembly of Experts Call for Keeping the Strait of Hormuz Closed

As signs of divisions and rivalry at the highest levels of the Iranian regime have become increasingly apparent, 62...

Workers and Retirees in Iran Once Again Protest Over Living Conditions

Retirees and workers held protest gatherings and marches in several cities across Iran on Sunday, June 28, once again...

Must read

US supports those pressing for Iranian freedom: White House

AFP: The White House expressed support Saturday for those...

Iran Could Recruit Al-Qaeda to Launch Terror Attacks Against the US

Iran Focus London, 26 Oct - Many people will...

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you