Iran Nuclear NewsBombing campaign an alternative to Iran deal: US congressman

Bombing campaign an alternative to Iran deal: US congressman


Iran Focus

Washington, 10 Jul – An alternative to ongoing international negotiations to limit Iran’s nuclear ambitions is to bomb its facilities, according to a senior member of US President Barack Obama’s Democratic Party in the US House of Representatives.

That bombing plot would set Iran’s progress back just a few years, said Rep. Eliot Engel (N.Y.), the top Democrat on the House Foreign Affairs Committee.

“No deal is better than a bad deal”, he said during a House committee hearing on a possible agreement between the world powers and Iran aimed at curbing Tehran’s nuclear activities in return for the lifting of international sanctions.

“The alternative to a deal would surely mean some kind of military strikes on Iran’s nuclear plant”.

“It’s not just accepting the deal or nothing”, he added. “There are things we’re going to have to come to grips with, and I believe one of them is bombing the nuclear reactor”.

Even with sanctions in place, Iran is the “largest state of terrorism on world”, and its finances instability “in Yemen, Syria, Iraq, Gaza and its Gulf allies”, Engel said.

The comments from Engel — who has cautiously viewed the Obama administration’s plans for a deal — increase the stakes for US negotiators, who appear to be closing in on the final terms of a deal. They also speak volumes about the few choices facing congressional lawmakers, who will have the opportunity to weigh in on the deal if one is reached in coming days.

During a separate hearing on Capitol Hill on Thursday, President Obama’s choice to be the next chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Gen. Joseph Dunford, told lawmakers that the US would have the ability to destroy Iran’s nuclear program, if it so chose.
But that would only be temporarily, Engel maintained.

“If we are able to sustain the sanctions regime and have a bombing of their plant that sets them back two years or three years, is that really a viable alternative?” he asked.
Lawmakers in Congress will be able to block the terms of the deal, assuming one is reached. But widespread scepticism in both parties could pose a hurdle to the Obama administration, which is negotiating the deal along with five other nations and Iran.

“That’s a bad deal for us: permanent concessions in exchange for temporary benefits — and that’s only if Iran doesn’t cheat like North Korea did”, Rep. Ed Royce, the Republican Chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, said during a hearing on the negotiations on Thursday. “So Iran is left a few steps away from the bomb and more able to dominate the region — this is my take on this”.

Rep. Darrell Issa, a Republican from California, said that the early outline of the deal was “the equivalent of the entire World War II Luftwaffe sitting on the ground with the promise that although the fuel tanks are right next to the planes, they won’t fully load the planes and the bombs for 10 years”.

“That’s kind of where we are”, he said. “We’re letting them have all the weapons of war”.

Some Democrats also expressed their scepticism of the plan, with Rep. Ami Bera (D-Calif.) saying he had “legitimate concerns” that the deal could needlessly bulk up the Iranian economy without giving international inspectors unfettered access to ensure Tehran is living up to its side of the bargain.

If Congress votes to approve the current deal, “then we have to the greatest extent possible locked ourselves into a deal in which in 12 years we have a nuclear Iran”, said Rep. Brad Sherman (D-Calif.). “So we shouldn’t do that”,

Yet it remains unclear exactly how much power Congress will be able to wield.

Even if lawmakers vote to block the deal, President Obama could veto the resolution. For Congress to override him, there needs to be two-thirds majorities in both chambers.

Based in part on wire reports

Latest news

Iran’s Economic Challenges in 2023: Inflation, Investment, and International Relations

As Iran enters the new Persian year, regime experts are raising concerns about the state of the country's economy....

What Gas Poisonings In Iran Tell Us About The Ruling Regime

For months schools in Iran have been in the crosshairs of gas attacks against the country’s children. The mullahs’...

Iran’s Regime Inches Toward Nuclear Weapons

Iran’s regime is once again at the center of a dangerous escalation of the proliferation of nuclear weapons. A...

US Congress Expresses Support for Iranian People’s Quest for a Democratic, Secular Republic

Several bipartisan members of the U.S. House of Representatives have presented a resolution (H. RES. 100) supporting the Iranian...

Wave Of Poisoning Attacks Against Schools Leave Hundreds Sick

Iran has been shaken for three months by serial poisoning attacks against all-girls schools, which has left more than...

Iranian Security Forces Beat Baluch Doctor To Death

On Thursday, February 23, activists in Sistan and Baluchestan provinces reported the news of the death of Dr. Ebrahim...

Must read

Iran summons Swiss envoy over scientist ‘abduction’

AFP: Iran has summoned the Swiss charge d'affaires to...

Iran sees pre-election US bid to reduce oil price

Reuters: A senior Iranian oil official said on Saturday...

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you