Iran Nuclear NewsCotton's View on the Iran Nuclear Deal

Cotton’s View on the Iran Nuclear Deal

-

Iran Focus

London, 6 Oct – On October 5, Republican Senator Tom Cotton told the Washington Post that military action against the Iranian Regime was “a credible option” and the renegotiation of the nuclear deal should be a discussion between the United States, European partners, Israel, and Arab allies.

This came just ten days before Donald Trump must decide whether or not to recertify Iran’s compliance with the nuclear agreement — which places restrictions on the Iranian Regime’s nuclear program in exchange for sanctions relief.

When questioned on whether the military option was a good idea, Cotton replied that the US certainly had the option and it need not be like the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan which have left a bitter taste in the mouths of the American public.

He said: “Most of your argument [against] is that we don’t have a credible military option, which is simply false. President Obama often implied that the only choice we had was capitulation under the [nuclear deal] or a decade of occupation after forceful regime change through the introduction of 150,000 mechanized troops, like we do in Iraq — that’s simply not the case.”

He continued: “We have a number of calibrated military strikes — like Ronald Reagan conducted against Libya, like Bill Clinton conducted repeatedly against Iraq like Donald Trump conducted against Syria. Like Ronald Reagan conducted against Iran itself, by blowing up half of its navy and several oil platforms.”

One of Cotton’s biggest concerns about the nuclear deal is that even if Iran was in complete compliance (evidence show that this is not true), it still allows the Regime to develop nuclear weapons in less than a generation, which is why he advocates for renegotiation.

He said: “Ultimately put Iran in the position of being a legitimate and lawful nuclear power in a mere 13 years.”

He continued: “I would say they’re [Iran] not complying, fully, and verifiably, and transparently… and it clearly is not in our vital national security interests. Iran’s role in the region is a campaign of imperial aggression across the Middle East. So, it’s time for a new approach.”

Cotton is believed to have met privately with Trump to put across his views on Iran and how the nuclear certification should go.

Earlier this week, Secretary of State Rex Tillerson said that the administration would place several options before Trump with regard to the nuclear deal, which could include military action but is more likely to include decertification with and without the rollback of sanctions.

Latest news

Iran in A Bottleneck Over Restoring Infrastructure After Ceasefire

A few weeks after heavy U.S. and Israeli attacks, and under the shadow of a fragile ceasefire, Iran is...

U.S.–Iranian Regime Talks in Uncertainty

On the second day of the ceasefire between the United States and Iran's regime, with continued transit restrictions in...

The Execution Machine of Iran’s Regime Runs Without Pause

Less than three weeks after the start of U.S. and Israeli attacks on Iran, a wave of executions of...

Political Prisoner Maryam Akbari Monfared Released from Prison After 17 Years

Maryam Akbari Monfared, a political prisoner, was released after serving 17 years in prison, even though under the Iranian...

Iran War Tensions Escalate as US Deadline Approaches

Donald Trump has once again warned Iran’s regime and called for a resolution to the conflict. He said he...

The Head of the Iranian Regime’s Judiciary Called for Accelerating and Increasing Death Sentences

On Tuesday, April 7, Gholamhossein Mohseni Ejei, the head of the Iranian regime’s judiciary, called for accelerating and increasing...

Must read

Iran still not cooperating on nuclear programme: IAEA chief

AFP: Iran has failed to provide any clarification on...

Mai Sato: The Human Rights Crisis in Iran Is Not Limited to the War

Mai Sato, the United Nations Special Rapporteur on the...

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you