OpinionIran in the World PressIran less than anxious at restive nuclear watchdogs

Iran less than anxious at restive nuclear watchdogs


Financial Times: When Mahmoud Ahmadi-Nejad, Iran’s fundamentalist president, recently met other senior leaders in Tehran, he suggested they should not worry unduly about growing western pressure. Financial Times

By Gareth Smyth

When Mahmoud Ahmadi-Nejad, Iran’s fundamentalist president, recently met other senior leaders in Tehran, he suggested they should not worry unduly about growing western pressure.

UN sanctions – which could follow if Iran’s nuclear file is soon referred to the Security Council – were “not important,” he said. “That’s the way the fundamentalists think,” said a regime insider familiar with the meeting.

Since taking over in August, Mr Ahmadi-Nejad and his new officials have faced an escalation in the international dispute about Iran’s nuclear programme.

European governments last month backed the US in persuading the governing board of the International Atomic Energy Agency to find Iran in “non-compliance” with the Nuclear Non-Proliferation treaty, so paving the way for referral to the Security Council in November.

Since then, Tehran has rejected the IAEA board’s request for greater “transparency” – including inspectors’ access to individuals and documents – and dismissed its calls to end the conversion of raw uranium into gas; an early phase in the sensitive uranium-enrichment process, which it resumed in August as two-year talks with the Europeans stalled.

Some Iranian officials are privately expressing concern about the conduct of diplomacy since the president replaced many experienced officials, including those handling the nuclear dispute. The speech he delivered at the UN summit in August was applauded at home but dismissed as confrontational by European officials.

While Mr Ahmadi-Nejad faces little immediate domestic pressure to moderate his stance, some politicians are beginning to question both his strategy and competence.

Last Friday, Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, the powerful former president whom Mr Ahmadi-Nejad defeated in June’s election, warned the west against “intimidation”, but also cautioned Iran against “sloganeering”.

Mohammad Atrianfar, editor of Shargh, the reformist newspaper, has argued not all countries should expect to enrich uranium, and Hossein Abdeh-Tabrizi, secretary general of the Tehran

Stock Exchange, has linked falling stock prices to the nuclear issue.

But Mr Ahmadi-Nejad may be taking advice elsewhere. Among the senior clerics he visited last week in the holy city of Qom was Ayatollah Mohammad-Taghi Mesbah-Yazdi, dubbed the “spiritual father” of the fundamentalists and an advocate of isolation from the west.

The sense Iran is under attack is shared by many of Mr Ahmadi-Nejad’s new cabinet, half of whom have a military background. “Their outlook is not the win-win of diplomats, but the zero-sum of the battlefield,” said an analyst.

“It’s a complicated deadlock – not for the first time in Iran – but what’s new is that Mr Ahmadi-Nejad and his team are not too unhappy about it,” said the regime insider. “They will continue [in defiance”> until their heads hit the stone. Then they will give way, but it’s hard for them or anyone else to predict the critical point. And that’s what’s so dangerous.”

The fundamentalists’ confidence comes partly from Iran’s likely resilience against sanctions.

As Opec’s second-largest producer, due to receive $36bn this year from sales, Iran is buoyed by high oil prices and does not expect exports to be curbed. The country is largely self-sufficient in food, and neighbours have porous borders. Foreign investment, outside energy, is already limited.

Moreover, Mr Ahmadi-Nejad remains popular at home after his landslide election victory. His cabinet’s first decision set up a “compassion fund”, freeing the equivalent of $1.3bn from oil income for a scheme to help young people find jobs, homes and a marriage partner.

The fundamentalists also argue that the outside world, and not Iran, is to blame for the nuclear confrontation. Two years of negotiations with the Europeans produced no tangible benefits, they say. According to the regime insider, former officials in charge of the nuclear file argued that the Europeans would eventually make concessions, including allowing Iran to keep a pilot enrichment plant. “But it seems the Europeans did not accept and so the talks with them ended. We’re now on a different road, heading in another direction,” he said.

Latest news

Snapback Sanctions, a Must Response to Iran’s Human Rights Abuse and JCPOA Violations

The protests in Iran have been going on for more than two months, even though the regime is cracking...

Growing Disintegration Among Iran Regime’s Forces

Iran has been shaken by a wave of nationwide protests since mid-September. The trigger was the death of the...

Grim Tidings for Iran’s Regime After Approval of UN Fact-Finding Mission

After many discussions and debates, the United Nations Human Rights Council has approved a fact-finding mission to investigate the...

Iranian People’s Resistance Changed the Appeasement Policy

Soon after the new US government started its obligations in January 2021, hand in hand with the European governments...

Khamenei’s Disgraceful Campaign Against Piranshahr and Javanrud, Who Will Be the Loser?

On the 67th day of Iran’s revolution, the Iranian regime attempted to put a halt to the protests in...

Iran: Expensive Medicine, Cheap Human Life

A look at the equipment and weapons that the Iranian regime has been using against its people to suppress...

Must read

Iran’s New Missiles Looks an Awful Lot Like North Korea’s

Iran Focus London, 25 Sep - Over the weekend, the...

Iran sanctions plan targets oil companies, tanker fleet to slash business

Bloomberg: A U.S. proposal to sanction Iran’s state-owned oil...

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you