Home Blog Page 90

Are Negotiations Between Iran’s Regime and US Heading Toward a Deadlock?

Esmaeil Mohades
-
0
Are Negotiations Between Iran’s Regime and US Heading Toward a Deadlock?

It appears that nuclear negotiations between the Iranian regime and the United States are moving toward a deadlock, with Tehran in a position of weakness and desperation. Recent remarks by U.S. President Donald Trump, stating that the Iranian regime would not be allowed any uranium enrichment, along with Tehran’s rejection of Washington’s offer, indicate a strategic failure for the regime in advancing its nuclear and diplomatic objectives.

On Monday, June 2, Donald Trump stated on Truth Social that under a potential agreement, “we will not allow any uranium enrichment!” This firm stance came after the Axios website reported that the U.S. had offered the Iranian regime a written proposal permitting limited low-purity enrichment (around 3%) for a defined period.

Iran’s Regime Dismisses IAEA Report About its Nuclear Program as “Biased and Baseless.”

Trump’s remarks signal a return to the “zero enrichment” policy, which had previously been emphasized by U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Special Envoy Steve Witkoff.

In response, Abbas Araghchi, the Iranian regime’s foreign minister, called the U.S. proposal “unacceptable” and stated that Tehran is preparing a response. A senior diplomat close to the Iranian regime’s negotiating team told Reuters that the Washington proposal is “one-sided” and lacks clear details about sanction relief. The diplomat added that the Iranian regime’s nuclear negotiations committee, operating under the supervision of the regime’s supreme leader, found the U.S. offer inadequate and not aligned with Tehran’s interests.

IAEA Reports and Pressure on the Iranian Regime

Two new reports by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), published on June 2, have further weakened the Iranian regime’s position. According to The Wall Street Journal, these reports show that since February 2025, the regime has increased its stockpile of 60%-enriched uranium by about 50%, an amount sufficient for building 10 nuclear weapons. This level of enrichment, which is close to weapons-grade purity, makes the Iranian regime the only non-nuclear country with such capabilities.

The second IAEA report also emphasizes the Iranian regime’s failure to meet its obligations regarding undeclared nuclear material research, indicating that Tehran continues to deceive in its nuclear program.

These reports have set the stage for the June 9 meeting of the IAEA Board of Governors, where the United States and European countries may propose a resolution against the Iranian regime for violating the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). The Wall Street Journal stressed that these reports provide sufficient evidence to justify the swift reimposition of international sanctions on the regime—an action that could intensify both economic and political pressure on Tehran.

Uncertainty Over the Continuation of Negotiations

CNN reported on June 3 that the holding of a sixth round of nuclear talks between the Iranian regime and the United States is shrouded in uncertainty and may not take place at all. Sources familiar with the matter told the network that the Iranian regime views the new U.S. proposal as irrelevant, unrealistic, and overly demanding.

A senior official of the Iranian regime stated that the repeated shifts in the U.S. position—including retreating from a limited enrichment offer to insisting on zero enrichment—have made the negotiations more difficult. The official added that the U.S. proposal contradicts the understandings reached during the fifth round of talks in Rome on May 23, 2025, which reflects a lack of coherent strategy from Washington.

The Iranian regime is in a position of weakness in the nuclear negotiations. On one hand, the IAEA reports and international pressure have placed Tehran at risk of broad sanctions being reinstated. On the other hand, the regime’s economy is on the brink of collapse under the weight of inflation, unemployment, and the continued devaluation of its national currency.

Pharmaceutical Corruption in Iran

Mehdi Hosseini
-
0
Pharmaceutical Corruption in Iran

The profiteering of pharmaceutical distribution companies and the resulting humanitarian disaster from the shortage of vital medicines in Iran

One of the most serious crises in Iran’s healthcare system is the hostage-taking of medicine distribution by companies affiliated with regime institutions—an issue that threatens not only pharmacies but directly endangers people’s lives.

One of the most common pressure tactics is “basket selling” of medicine and rationing of widely-used, life-saving drugs. This begins under the pretext of “supporting domestic production.” For example, a medicine like warfarin is first completely removed from the import list. Then, due to insufficient domestic production, it is distributed in a trickle to certain individuals close to the regime and ultimately sold on the black market at several times its original price. Pharmacies can only obtain this medication if they also purchase other low-demand but high-profit drugs.

This method, which resembles pharmaceutical extortion, often results in medications expiring or becoming unusable while still in customs or the warehouses of distribution companies. Given the critical nature of some of these drugs, pharmacies and patients are forced to obtain them at any cost.

Another pressure tactic used by distribution companies is lowering the profit margin on essential medicines and shortening the repayment window for pharmacies. For instance, brand-name medications in fields such as chemotherapy, MS, and diabetes are offered with a minimal profit (around 6%) and short settlement periods (15 days to one month), while insurance organizations delay pharmacy payments for 6 to 8 months. This forces pharmacies to purchase Iranian or Chinese biosimilar products that offer higher margins and more lenient payment terms, a condition imposed by the distributors.

In the past two years of acute crisis and increased working capital requirements for pharmacies due to drug shortages, the legal departments of distribution companies have become more aggressive than ever. Exploiting the centralized banking system and market liquidity shortages, they seize bank accounts, confiscate the assets of pharmacy founders, and collect massive legal fees for even the slightest payment delays—without providing any formal notice or grace period for settlement.

Iranian Regime MP Warns About Intensified Medicine Shortages

What is noteworthy is that nearly all pharmaceutical distribution companies are directly or indirectly controlled by regime institutions. As a result, no independent body has the power to confront or oversee their actions. Consequently, the only victims of this corrupt and chaotic system are the people and patients.

As long as this regime-controlled structure persists, there is no hope for improvements in public health or equitable access to medicine. The only ultimate solution lies in moving beyond Iran’s regime, which is the root cause of this structural crisis.

 

Iranian Prisoners Sound Alarm as Regime Escalates Executions

Esmaeil Mohades
-
0
Iranian Prisoners Sound Alarm as Regime Escalates Executions

Tehran, Iran – June 3, 2025 – In a stark warning issued on their 71st week of protest, participants in the “No to Executions Tuesdays” campaign have urgently called on families of death-row prisoners and the international community to break the silence surrounding the Iranian regime’s escalating use of capital punishment, a tactic increasingly seen as a desperate measure to quell dissent. The campaign, now active in 46 prisons across Iran, highlighted a horrifying surge in state-sanctioned killings.

The prisoners’ statement reveals that since May 21, 2025, (the beginning of the Persian month of Khordad), at least 67 prisoners, including three women, have been executed. This averages out to approximately seven executions per day. In a particularly brutal display, 20 prisoners were reportedly hanged on a single day, May 28, 2025.

The “No to Executions Tuesdays” campaign: Ongoing hunger strike in 41 prisons across Iran

These figures align with reports from outside opposition groups. The National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI) stated on May 30, 2025, that 41 individuals were executed over just three days, from May 26 to May 28, 2025. This equates to nearly 14 executions daily, or one person killed less than every two hours. The NCRI also noted that since July 2024, during Masoud Pezeshkian’s presidential tenure, the number of executions has reached a staggering 1,275.

The “No to Executions Tuesdays” campaign statement asserts that this wave of executions is a deliberate strategy by the regime. “The regime of slaughter and execution, in its dungeons, executes prisoners en masse in complete secrecy,” the statement reads, adding that these actions, coupled with the “mockery of international laws and leveraging religion,” are aimed at “suppressing justice-seeking and popular uprisings.”

Saeed Masouri: 170 Executions In The Past Month In Iranian Prisons, Minute-Long Trials, And Death Sentences

The prisoners emphasize that this high level of capital punishment is accompanied by widespread violations of the right to a fair trial. They highlight specific cases to underscore the grave injustices. On Wednesday, May 28, 2025, Pedram Madani was reportedly hanged in Ghezel Hesar prison on charges of “espionage,” his execution carried out in “media silence.”

Furthermore, the statement raises alarm over the case of Mohammad Amin Mahdavi Shayesteh, previously sentenced to death for “espionage” by Judge Abolghassem Salavati, notoriously dubbed the “death judge.” Mahdavi Shayesteh’s appeal for a retrial has been rejected by the Supreme Court, placing him at “serious risk of execution.”

In light of these grim developments, the “No to Executions Tuesdays” campaign directly implores families of those condemned to death to act. “The campaign…advises the families of death-row prisoners to quickly publicize the case files of their loved ones and inform the people of Iran and human rights institutions,” the statement urges. The stated aim of this public disclosure is crucial: “so that with this enlightenment, we can stop and disable the machinery of slaughter and execution.”

The prisoners also issue a stark warning to these families: “and they should not be deceived by the tricks or threats of intelligence agents and interrogators, lest the government execute prisoners in media silence and, in a sense, trample their right to life through state-sanctioned murder.”

The “No to Executions Tuesdays” campaign itself demonstrates growing internal resistance. Having commenced in January 2024, it marked its 71st consecutive week on June 3, 2025. The recent inclusion of prisoners from Firuzabad prison in Fars province has expanded the campaign’s reach to 46 prisons across Iran, where participating inmates engage in weekly hunger strikes. The campaign also expressed solidarity with other protest movements, such as the ongoing strike by truck drivers, now in its twelfth day.

The prisoners’ message is one of both dire warning and resilient determination. They call upon the broader public, particularly families of those on death row, to support their campaign and ensure that “the voice of ‘No to Execution’ must resonate in every city and street.” They conclude with a powerful assertion: “Power lies in our unity and solidarity,” signaling that despite the regime’s brutal crackdown, the spirit of resistance remains unbroken.

 

Contradictory Reports on U.S. Opposition or Approval of Uranium Enrichment on Iranian Soil

Jubin Katiraie
-
0
Contradictory Reports on U.S. Opposition or Approval of Uranium Enrichment on Iranian Soil

Donald Trump, the President of the United States, once again emphasized that in any potential agreement with the Iranian regime, he would not permit any form of uranium enrichment on Iranian soil. Prior to Trump’s statement, some U.S. media outlets had reported a shift in the U.S. position and claimed that Washington had agreed to allow limited enrichment inside Iran.

On the afternoon of Monday, June 2, Trump posted on Truth Social, criticizing Joe Biden’s policies and reiterated that in any potential deal with the Iranian regime, the U.S. would not permit any uranium enrichment by the regime.

This came just hours after the Axios website reported that the Trump administration had made a confidential proposal to the Iranian regime allowing limited uranium enrichment within Iran.

Axios: Secret U.S. Proposal to Iran Includes Permission for Limited Uranium Enrichment

Sources familiar with the matter told Axios that the proposal opens a new path toward reaching an agreement, though it carries the risk of backlash from U.S. allies.

CNN report on Tehran’s rejection of the U.S. proposal and possible collapse of the negotiations

On the other hand, a senior official from the Iranian regime told CNN on Monday, June 2, that the new U.S. proposal regarding the nuclear agreement was “incoherent and disjointed.”

CNN did not name the senior official but reported, quoting him, that the Iranian regime is rejecting the new U.S. offer.

The senior Iranian regime official also told CNN that the biggest obstacle to progress in the negotiations has been the United States’ constantly shifting positions.

CNN further reported, quoting sources familiar with the negotiations, that momentum toward a new agreement is collapsing.

The CNN report stated that the U.S. had altered its stance on uranium enrichment in the new proposal. According to the proposal, the U.S. might invest in Iran’s civilian nuclear energy program and join an international consortium tasked with overseeing low-level uranium enrichment on Iranian soil. This potential consortium would include Middle Eastern countries as well as the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).

Reuters also reported on Monday, June 2, quoting a senior Iranian regime diplomat, that the regime is on the verge of rejecting a new U.S. proposal aimed at resolving the decades-long nuclear dispute.

This diplomat also added: “Iran is drafting a negative response to the U.S. proposal, which could be interpreted as a rejection of the U.S. offer.”

The new U.S. nuclear proposal was delivered to officials of the Iranian regime on Saturday, May 31, by the foreign minister of Oman, who has been mediating between Tehran and Washington, during a brief visit to Tehran.

 

Uncontrolled inflation continues in Iran; sugar prices rise by 40%

Sia Rajabi
-
0
Uncontrolled inflation continues in Iran; sugar prices rise by 40%

Bahman Danaei, secretary of the Sugar and Sugar Factories Association in Iran, announced a 40% increase in sugar prices in the country.

One-kilogram packaged sugar has also reached consumers with a 31% price hike.

He cited reasons such as “rising production costs, increased wages, and transportation expenses” for the surge in sugar prices.

In recent years, staple food items consumed by households have topped the list of goods most affected by inflation.

Iranian Families Forced To Consume Cheap Food To Stave Off Hunger

According to a report by the Research Center of the Iran Chamber of Commerce in November 2024, by March 2022, around 32 million people in the country were living below the food poverty line. The organization added that this trend is rapidly expanding due to the severe inflation of recent years.

The secretary of the Sugar and Sugar Factories Association also stated: “The aim of price adjustments is to ensure sustainable production and support the sugar supply chain in the country so that factories can continue operating and food security in this sector is maintained.”

In recent years, officials of Iran’s regime have frequently used the phrase “price adjustments” as a justification for the ongoing increase in commodity prices.

Following the intensifying economic crisis and the regime’s failure to control inflation, recent reports indicate a rise in bread prices across various provinces, with price-setting responsibilities handed over to provincial governors.

In mid-May, the price of raw milk in Iran rose by about 28%, and media outlets predicted that this would lead to a roughly 42% surge in dairy product prices and a significant spike in overall costs.

These price hikes continue in Iran at a time when inflation over the past years has steadily increased the number of people living in poverty.

The Minimum Wage for Iranian Workers in 2025 Announced

The state-run daily, Donya-e-Eqtesad reported in September 2024 that the poverty line for a three-person household in Tehran is around 200 million rials (approximately $240) this year. Field reports suggest that this figure can reach as high as 400 million rials (about $480) in the city. Meanwhile, the minimum wage of a worker with two children barely reaches 150 million rials (around $180).

Economic experts have warned that roughly one-third of Iran’s population is unable to meet their basic needs.

 

Iranian Families Forced To Consume Cheap Food To Stave Off Hunger

Mehdi Hosseini
-
0
Iranian Families Forced To Consume Cheap Food To Stave Off Hunger

As reports continue to highlight chaos in Iran’s food market and the ongoing rise in food prices, Arash Anisian, Director General of Economics and Treatment at the Iranian regime’s Medical Council, stated that many families are forced to consume cheap, high-calorie foods with little to no nutritional value just to stave off hunger.

On Monday, June 2, in a radio interview, Anisian said: “More than 40% of Tehran residents are obese, and a significant portion of this figure is due to an unhealthy lifestyle and unbalanced diet.”

This official from the Medical Council referred to the sharp decline in the consumption of protein, meat, and chicken as a “bitter reality,” adding: “Rising prices and declining purchasing power have forced many families to eliminate or severely limit protein from their meals, and this threatens public health.”

168% Increase in Food Prices During the First Eight Months of Iran’s New Administration

Amid the rising prices of key food items in Iran’s markets, several trade officials have criticized the disorder in supply and the growing number of violations in the food market.

Bahman Danaei, secretary of the Sugar and Sugar Factories Association, announced on Monday, June 2, that sugar prices in Iran have risen by 40%.

He cited factors such as “rising production costs, increased wages, and transportation expenses” as reasons behind the hike in sugar prices.

While Iran’s economy is experiencing a minimum inflation rate of 40%, it is expected that food items would also see price hikes; however, the core economic problems lie in financial imbalance, budget deficits, and government inefficiency.

Meanwhile, media in Iran reported disruptions in the electronic ration coupon system over the past two days, stating that citizens were unable to use their available credits in some chain stores.

In addition to the issue of citizens being unable to access their ration credits, media outlets have also reported on the practice of forced or bundled sales of goods. In this regard, Hamidreza Rastegar, head of the Tehran Chamber of Guilds, stated that such sales are illegal and added that no store or business is allowed to force customers to buy multiple items together.

Reza Kangari, head of the Union of Food Wholesalers, also addressed the gap between official and market prices for cooking oil, stating that the price difference exceeds 80% to 90%. He further added that Indian rice is being sold to consumers at prices 20% higher than the approved rate.

The state-run newspaper Ham-Mihan, in a field report on June 1 titled “They want food but have no money,” wrote about restaurants, cafes, and fast food outlets in Tehran and the rising trend of unpaid tabs and customers skipping bills.

Ham-Mihan quoted the owner of a traditional eatery in central Tehran who said his daily sales had dropped from 200 servings in the winter to 140 servings—a 30% decline.

One part of the report reads: “A young woman and her daughter stood behind the refrigerator at a small eatery on Khayyam Street in Tehran and asked the vendor about the price of a sandwich. One million and two hundred thousand rials (approximately $1.4). The woman reconsidered and walked away without buying.”

The publication of such reports highlights how, with continuously rising inflation and prices, even the most basic meals have become difficult to afford for many citizens in Iran.

Over recent months, numerous reports have been published regarding the worsening economic crisis and the Iranian regime’s inability to curb inflation, which has led to widespread public dissatisfaction.

This comes while Iran is considered one of the richest countries in the world in terms of natural resources, but the regime’s rulers spend all the revenues from oil and other national assets on terrorist interventions and the nuclear bomb project.

 

Axios: Secret U.S. Proposal to Iran Includes Permission for Limited Uranium Enrichment

Hoshang Amiri
-
0
Axios: Secret U.S. Proposal to Iran Includes Permission for Limited Uranium Enrichment

Axios reported in an exclusive piece that the United States has, in a confidential proposal to Iran’s regime, allowed limited uranium enrichment on Iranian soil—an action that contradicts the public positions of Trump administration officials, including Steve Witkoff, the White House special envoy, and Marco Rubio, the U.S. Secretary of State.

The proposal, which was reportedly delivered to Tehran on Saturday by Witkoff, would allow Iran to continue low-level uranium enrichment for a duration to be determined in upcoming negotiations.

Sources familiar with the matter told Axios that the proposal opens a new path toward reaching an agreement but creates the risk of giving the regime a path to obtaining nuclear weapons.

Grossi: Iran Seeking to ‘Sevenfold’ Its Production of 60% Enriched Uranium

According to these sources, under the proposal, Iran would be allowed to enrich uranium up to a 3% threshold, but it must temporarily shut down its underground facilities and halt the development of advanced centrifuges.

Strict monitoring by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) is also expected to be implemented, along with the immediate enforcement of the Additional Protocol. Gradual lifting of sanctions will depend on verification of Iran’s compliance by both Washington and the IAEA.

Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told Axios “President Trump has made it clear that Iran can never obtain a nuclear bomb. Special Envoy Witkoff has sent a detailed and acceptable proposal to the Iranian regime, and it’s in their best interest to accept it. Out of respect for the ongoing deal, the Administration will not comment on details of the proposal to the media”.

In response, Esmail Baghaei, spokesperson for Iran’s regime foreign ministry, stated that Iran has not yet received sufficient guarantees regarding the timing and manner of sanction relief and is still reviewing the U.S. proposal.

He also rejected the White House’s assessment that the proposal is “acceptable” to Iran.

Increase in Execution Days at Ghezel Hesar Prison in Iran

Sia Rajabi
-
0
Increase in Execution Days at Ghezel Hesar Prison in Iran

The addition of Mondays to the execution schedule at Ghezel Hesar prison is yet another sign of the regime’s instrumental use of executions to instill fear, cover up regional crises, and suppress the impoverished and protesting population.

As public opinion and human rights organizations continue to warn about the intensifying wave of executions in Iran, Ghezel Hesar prison in Karaj has once again come under scrutiny.

According to reports received, in addition to Wednesdays—previously the customary execution day—Mondays have now been officially added to the prison’s execution calendar.

This change signals both an acceleration in the regime’s machinery of repression to physically eliminate convicts, and a deliberate strategy by the ruling dictatorship to use executions as a tool of intimidation and social control.

Iran: Execution of Pedram Madani in Ghezel Hesar Prison

In recent days, a number of prisoners have been moved from general wards to solitary confinement cells known as “suites.”

One of these prisoners, Vahid Amiri Ghahi, born in 1988 and sentenced to death in a drug-related case, was transferred on Saturday to solitary confinement in Unit 1 of Ghezel Hesar prison for the imminent implementation of his sentence. He has been held in this prison since 2019.

Execution: Not Justice, but a Policy of Death

The surge in executions is occurring amid a peak in poverty, unemployment, inflation, and widespread social discontent in the country.

Most of those sentenced to death are direct victims of the regime’s plundering economic policies and systemic dysfunction.

Many of them, like Vahid Amiri, were driven by poverty and social inequality into paths that ultimately led to heavy and fatal sentences.

Meanwhile, the true architects of poverty and economic ruin remain safely in power, continuing to plunder the country’s resources with impunity.

An Alternative Tool for Regional Failures

As international pressure mounts and the Iranian regime suffers increasing regional setbacks—especially in Iraq, Syria, and Lebanon—the wave of executions has clearly taken on a political function.

Through mass executions, the Iranian regime seeks to contain its legitimacy crisis and widespread domestic discontent by creating an atmosphere of fear, aiming to prevent any potential uprisings.

This policy is reminiscent of past periods when the regime, gripped by fear of social explosion, resorted to preemptive massacres.

The Urgent Need to Expand the “No to Executions Tuesdays” Campaign

In response to the catastrophic rise in executions, the “No to Executions Tuesdays” campaign is expanding rapidly.

Prisoners, families, civil society activists, and international organizations have turned this campaign into a tool of resistance against the regime’s death policy.

This campaign is not only a symbol of protest but a voice for the lives condemned to death in the silence of prison cells.

The “No to Executions Tuesdays” campaign has been ongoing for more than 70 weeks, with political prisoners going on hunger strike every Tuesday in protest against death sentences.

The rise in executions at Ghezel Hesar prison underscores the urgent need to strengthen this campaign more than ever.

Every Tuesday, the cry of “No” to the dictatorship’s killing machine is the echo of human conscience that refuses to witness state-sanctioned killings disguised as “law enforcement.”

In reality, what is carried out in prisons under the name of justice not only lacks legal legitimacy under international law but also constitutes part of the physical elimination of the poor and the dissenters under the guise of domestic legislation.

This blatant violation of fundamental human rights is a compelling reason to demand an immediate halt to executions and international scrutiny of Iran’s judicial system and prison conditions.

 

Saeed Masouri: 170 Executions In The Past Month In Iranian Prisons, Minute-Long Trials, And Death Sentences

Mehdi Hosseini
-
0
Saeed Masouri: 170 Executions In The Past Month In Iranian Prisons, Minute-Long Trials, And Death Sentences

Saeed Masouri, An Iranian political prisoner who has been incarcerated for over twenty-five years, has written a letter from Ghezel Hesar prison in Karaj exposing the process of issuing and executing death sentences in Iran, particularly in the case of political detainees. In this letter, he reveals the Iranian regime’s tactics for executing political prisoners and describes these actions as criminal.

Excerpts from the letter follow:

To all awakened consciences, especially human rights reporters, Ms. Mai Sato, and the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights: The crime of execution includes other criminal preliminaries as well.

With twenty-five years of imprisonment, I am witnessing a wave of executions that is unprecedented in the past two or three decades. In the past month alone, over 170 individuals have been executed. It is often said that every criminal act is preceded by criminal preparations that remain hidden beneath the surface.

As a cellmate of countless prisoners who, over the past twenty-five years, have been sentenced to death and taken to the gallows, I have witnessed several recurring patterns in the cases of death row prisoners, especially those accused of political offenses (i.e., “acting against national security”).

In such cases, from beginning to end, the entire file is built by interrogators from the Ministry of Intelligence and the IRGC Intelligence Organization. Steps such as transfer to the prosecutor’s office, interrogation, and submission to court are purely formal and superficial.

Then the prisoner is taken to the prosecutor with that fabricated file and brought to court, giving the false appearance that all the legal procedures of a fair trial have been followed, with no involvement from the Ministry or the IRGC.

It is widely known that the so-called “work report sheet” (a case summary) prepared by the Ministry and IRGC is the sole basis for issuing both the indictment and the judge’s ruling. These so-called “judges” do not even read the case files.

There is no logical argument or credible evidence in the file, no opportunity for defense (as the trials last no more than ten minutes), and no access to the file for the attorney—contrary to Article 48 of their own Code of Criminal Procedure.

The verdicts are pre-written and merely announced

The head of Branch 33 of the Moghaddas Prosecutor’s Office, Ghanatkar, explicitly stated in the presence of political prisoners that the files of our two cellmates, Mehdi Hasani and Behrooz Ehsani, were confidential and secret.

“This case is confidential”—such a seemingly simple phrase clearly violates the defendant’s right to defend themselves against baseless accusations and fabricated charges.

Why are even those prisoners scheduled to be executed not allowed to know the reasons behind their executions, and why are their lawyers denied access to the files?

The only way to hide the lack of legitimate evidence is to declare the files secret and confidential…

…in hopes of coercing the accused into making forced confessions—sometimes televised or aired as so-called documentaries—while offering promises of avoiding execution or receiving a reduced sentence.The accused is thus placed in a dilemma: either they accept and make false confessions or face execution!!

But the regime does not stop there. It summons and threatens the family, saying that if their loved ones do not express remorse, make some kind of confession, or seek pardon, the execution is inevitable and beyond their control.

And if they are executed, the regime tells the families it is their own fault and that of the prisoner!!!

This method of forced confessions and portraying defendants as regretful and remorseful constitutes the criminal and inhumane preparations that precede the actual crime of execution and by enforcing it in each case, they pave the way for repeating the same process in future cases.

My message to you and to the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights is this: Has this blatant violation of human rights and the mass executions not yet warranted being raised at the UN Security Council?

Saeed Masouri

June 2025

Ghezel Hesar Prison

 

Global Lawmakers Rally Behind Maryam Rajavi and Democratic Change in Iran at Free Iran 2025 Conference

Jubin Katiraie
-
0
Global Lawmakers Rally Behind Maryam Rajavi and Democratic Change in Iran at Free Iran 2025 Conference

The Second Free Iran 2025 Conference, convened near Paris, brought together lawmakers, former heads of state, human rights advocates, and youth leaders from around the world in a united stance for democratic regime change in Iran. Led by Maryam Rajavi, President-elect of the National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI), the event emphasized rejection of both monarchy and theocracy, and support for a secular, democratic alternative.

In her opening remarks, Maryam Rajavi declared, “The regime is now facing a tsunami of internal crisis, political turmoil, widespread public discontent, and deepening economic and social challenges.” She emphasized the need for regime change to counter the nuclear threat and championed the NCRI’s Ten-Point Plan as “a realistic and democratic alternative.” Rajavi added, “The freedom of Iran is the guarantee of peace in the region and security for the world.”

Numerous lawmakers backed her vision. Lars Rise, former Norwegian MP, highlighted widespread legislative support: “570 British lawmakers, including a majority of the House of Commons and the Irish Senate, have now endorsed this vision for a free Iran.” He acknowledged the courage it takes to oppose appeasement.

Carsten Müller, German MP, warned: “The current regime is a tremendous risk for democracy and freedom across the world.” He called for the IRGC to be listed as a terrorist group: “We need to take action now.” Serdar Yüksel, also from Germany, added, “The regime in Iran has never been as weak as it is today.”

Italian MP Naike Gruppioni praised the Ten-Point Plan as “a bright vision for democracy, an Iran without death sentences, where women live freely, where elections are free and fair,” urging recognition of the NCRI. Fellow MP Emanuele Pozzolo stressed: “It is not a reformable regime… We must say clearly that we can’t have a dialogue with this kind of regime.” Gianna Gancia, from Piemonte, emphasized “firm and resolute action” and endorsed snapback sanctions.

Former Icelandic PM Geir Haarde honored political prisoners, asserting, “The Iranian people have shown immense courage rejecting both monarchical and religious dictatorships.” He backed Rajavi’s plan: “This plan offers a roadmap to a democratic future in Iran and lasting peace in the region.”

Norwegian MPs Ola Elvestuen and Rasmus Hansson expressed solidarity, with Hansson saying, “You’re fighting our fight, and we’re fighting yours.” Journalist Nina Hansson spotlighted labor protests: “Their protest is not an isolated labor dispute but a cry for freedom, justice and dignity.”

Baroness Sandip Verma, UK House of Lords, advocated for a special tribunal: “What is really missing is a special tribunal to investigate and prosecute those responsible for crimes against humanity and genocide.” Lord Steve McCabe echoed support for Resistance Units, warning that neglecting them would be “a huge strategic mistake.”

Former Dutch Senator Kees de Lange declared the regime in “irreversible decay—economic, military, and above all, moral.” Derk Jan Eppink cited a disturbing rise in executions in 2025. Berlin State MP Stefanie Bung endorsed sanctions and emphasized, “All human beings deserve freedom.” Christian Calderone condemned appeasement, stating, “Freedom is the enemy of dictators.”

Icelandic MP Dilja Mist Einarsdottir highlighted youth and women as drivers of change: “Change in Iran is not a question of if, but when.” Former German MP Leo Dautzenberg stressed the importance of PMOI Resistance Units: “The path of resistance has been paid in blood.” Nadine Ruf honored the role of women in the uprising and said, “Let’s be the shoulders on which other women can stand.”

Thomas Lutze criticized media silence: “The strike of truck drivers has not been reported in Germany.” Former Romanian MP Ben Oni Ardelean likened Iran’s regime to Ceausescu’s: “He didn’t recognize his people—Khamenei is making the same mistake.” Former UK MP Sir Alan Meale called the ongoing uprisings “a real revolution.”

Former UK MP Sir David Crosby said, “Iran will be free because the people will.” Struan Stevenson, former Scottish MEP, asserted the regime is “at its weakest point since 1979” and called the NCRI “a government in waiting.” Nahal Safa, 22, honored her uncle’s execution during the 1988 massacre and said, “These executions are not a show of strength—they are the regime’s loudest cry of fear.”

Youth speakers Hiva Mohammadi, Azar Karimi, and Ehsan Gharaee reflected on family histories of exile and loss, echoing belief in the Ten-Point Plan. Karimi called Rajavi “an inspiration to all Iranians.” Gharaee recalled how the regime executed his father and tried to silence his mother and family: “No funeral, no grave—only silence.” Hosein Yaghubi denounced both monarchy and theocracy, supporting the NCRI as the “modern embodiment” of democracy.

Former Portuguese MEP Paulo Casaca called the regime “compulsive liars” and praised Ashraf 3 residents as “heroes.” Irish officials John Paul Phelan and Jim Higgins urged stronger national support and grassroots mobilization. Former Italian Senators Roberto Rampi and Antonio Razzi supported renewed UN sanctions. Mario Galea questioned Tehran’s credibility: “If we cannot trust them with the sacred word of Allah, how can we trust them with nuclear power?”

The conference ended with a clear message: the Iranian people’s call for freedom is louder than ever, and the NCRI—through the Ten-Point Plan—stands as a credible, inclusive, and democratic alternative.

 

1...899091...3,782Page 90 of 3,782