Rising Abuse of Psychiatric Medications in Iran

0
The state-run Shargh newspaper reported an increase in the misuse of psychiatric medications in Iran, noting that such drugs can be obtained in Naser Khosrow—Tehran’s black-market drug hub—“in less than ten minutes.” The November 17 report stated: “A walk through Naser Khosrow shows that in less than ten minutes, one can access various psychiatric drugs: Vyvanse, Ritalin, Diazepam, Zolpidem, Midazolam, and dozens more, sold at unbelievable prices—ranging from 2 to 5 million rials per blister pack.”
Iranians Are Giving Up Visiting Doctors Due To High Cost of Treatment and Medicine
The report was based on interviews with drug users, psychiatrists, nurses in major Tehran hospital toxicology wards, and pharmacy owners. A nurse told Shargh: “Almost no shift ends without at least one patient coming in due to psychiatric drug misuse.” An unnamed psychiatrist said there is no updated data on drug misuse and addiction in Iran. He told Shargh: “Drugs used for psychological disorders—like Vyvanse, which falls under amphetamines—are prone to misuse.”

Getting high on medication

One user, not yet in his twenties, said in an interview that he has seen the many consequences of misuse among his friends and has “lived through it.” He explained that “every once in a while, the drugs people use become more varied,” noting that some medications intended for cancer patients are used by certain youth because they cause “a pleasant kind of high.” He also pointed to the rising use of sedatives among teenagers and young adults, adding that the main problem is that the drugs initially make the user feel better, but as the body adapts, their effect fades, the person’s mental state worsens, and they “make sudden dangerous decisions.” He emphasized that doctors “prescribe these drugs easily.” In recent years, multiple reports have highlighted the rising prevalence of mental health disorders in Iran. Official data shows that about 25% to 30% of the population suffers from some form of mental disorder, while chronic economic and social pressures have pushed the country’s collective mental health into a warning state. Experts cite factors such as social restrictions and pressures, crippling economic sanctions, political instability, and even war as contributors to this situation. In addition, suicide attempts in Iran have risen significantly in recent years.

Tehran Retirees Association: Retiree Salaries Do Not Cover Living Expenses

The head of the Retirees Association of Tehran Province, referring to the livelihood problems faced by millions of retirees in Iran, said that their salaries do not match “high inflation and recent price increases.” For non-Iranian readers: this association represents retirees covered by Iran’s Social Security Organization, the country’s largest pension fund. Ali Dehghan-Kia, speaking with the state-run radio on Tuesday, November 18, emphasized that retirees face “serious livelihood problems” and added: “The mismatch between the salaries received and the cost of living has caused many of them to be unable to meet their basic needs.”
Nurses, Workers, Army Retirees, And Poultry Farmers Hold Protests In Cities Across Iran
He noted that the current salary of minimum-wage retirees is between 100 million and 110 million rials (approximately $ 97). He added: “Even when including a dependent spouse or children, this amount reaches 140 million to 145 million rials (approximately $ 123 to 130), which is not sufficient for living in the current conditions.” Dehghan-Kia stressed that “with inflation above one-hundred percent in food items, household living costs have come under severe pressure,” and added: “Any increase in our salaries depends on the decision of the Supreme Labor Council. We have repeatedly asked the government to hold a session to raise wages for the second half of the year, but no action has been taken yet.” For non-Iranian readers: the Supreme Labor Council is the main state-controlled body that sets annual wages in Iran. He emphasized the need for proper implementation of laws concerning retirees and added that if the law had been respected over the past forty years, the minimum retirement salary should not have been less than 320 million to 350 million rials. Dehghan-Kia also referred to healthcare difficulties faced by retirees, saying: “With aging, the need for medical care increases, but healthcare costs are unaffordable for many of them.” According to the latest data from spring 2024, more than eight-and-a-half million primary and dependent retirees receive pensions from the Social Security Organization. Dependent pensioners are individuals supported by a primary pension recipient.

The Supreme Labor Council meeting was held without discussing wages

The 337th meeting of the Supreme Labor Council was held on Monday, November 17, but according to media reports, the agenda did not include worker wages. In contrast, according to the state-run Tasnim News Agency, the main focus of the meeting was “amending the regulations for selecting members of labor dispute resolution bodies.” The session also approved a resolution allowing the Islamic Labor Councils—state-controlled worker representation bodies—to continue nominating retired members to sit on dispute resolution committees. Tasnim commented on the resolution, stating: “The continued presence of retirees in positions needed by young people seems strange.” The neglect of worker wages by the Supreme Labor Council comes at a time when even pro-government labor organizations have repeatedly demanded wage adjustments. These requests have been opposed by Ahmad Meydari, Iran’s regime minister of cooperatives, labor, and social welfare. Currently, the base wage for workers covered by the Labor Law is close to 110 million rials per month. With benefits included, this amount reaches around 150 million rials (approximately $ 133). In contrast, some pro-government labor groups say that the monthly cost of living has reached 580 million rials (approximately $ 513). According to the two clauses of Article 41 of the Labor Law, the minimum wage must be set based on the inflation rate and the cost of living for a worker’s household. However, the second clause has not been applied in the Supreme Labor Council’s wage calculations for decades. This practice by successive governments of Iran’s regime is described by labor activists and unions as “wage suppression.” Wage suppression by the government continues even though, according to the state-run ILNA News Agency citing official data, the cost-of-living basket for worker households has increased by “more than 60%” since the beginning of the year. In addition, some essential items needed by workers have increased by “100% or even more.”

Iranian Political Prisoner Sentenced to Death as Regime Authorities Force His Family Into Silence

The death sentence for Mohammad-Mehdi Soleimani, one of those arrested during the nationwide protests of 2022, has been issued amid extensive ambiguities in his case, heavy security pressure on his family, and an absence of judicial transparency. These protests erupted across Iran after the killing of Mahsa Amini in morality-police custody. This young man, born in the 2000s, is now facing a finalized death sentence—issued through the same repeated pattern used against protesters: fabricating cases, extracting confessions under pressure, and threatening families.
Iran’s Regime Continue Execution Spree With 13 Hangings in Four Days
The incident dates back to September 21, 2022, when during protests in the Abkuh neighborhood of Mashhad, a security officer named Rasoul Doust-Mohammadi was killed. Only forty-eight hours later, the governor of Mashhad announced that “the assailant has been arrested,” but no name, photo, or details of the detained person were released. This media silence continued for nearly two years until November 17, 2024, when the state-run Khorasan newspaper suddenly headlined: “The killer of Rasoul Doust-Mohammadi has been sentenced to death.” For the first time, the initials “M.H. Soleimani” appeared in the report—later confirmed to be Mohammad-Mehdi Soleimani. Khorasan is a major state-run daily based in Mashhad and aligned with Iran’s regime. According to that same report, Branch Five of the Criminal Court One of Razavi Khorasan Province, presided over by Judge Mohammad Shoja‘pour-Fadaki, sentenced him to qesas (retribution in kind, meaning execution). In addition, he was sentenced to two and a half years in prison and seventy-four lashes on the charge of “possessing incendiary materials.”

Lack of legal representation, lack of family access, and ambiguities in the judicial process

Available information shows that it is still unknown whether Mohammad-Mehdi Soleimani had access to an independent lawyer during interrogation and trial. No official details have been released about the judicial process, how the accusations were proven, or what evidence the court used. His family has also been placed under intense security pressure and barred from giving statements, publishing photos, or even revealing his exact age. Local sources say the family was warned that “if the case is publicized, the situation will get worse”—a threat that has become a consistent tactic in protest-related cases in recent years.

Accounts from cellmates: a claim of finding a knife, not committing a murder

One former cellmate has said that Mohammad-Mehdi Soleimani claimed at the time of his arrest that he had “found a bloody knife on the street,” which led to his detention. No official explanation has been given regarding this claim, any forensic matching of the knife to the scene, or any medical examiner’s reports. These accounts, combined with the lack of transparency, further reinforce the likelihood of coerced confessions obtained under pressure, torture, or threats. According to numerous reports from prisons under Iran’s dictatorial system, many confessions attributed to protesters are not obtained under fair conditions but through physical and psychological torture, threats, long solitary confinement, and pressure on families. In similar cases in recent years, prisoners have explained after their release that interrogators forced them to accept accusations with statements such as “If you don’t cooperate, we will arrest your family” or “If you don’t confirm what we say, you will be sentenced to death.”

Threatening families and the cycle of covert executions

One of the most alarming aspects of such cases is the intimidation of families into silence. Many families of protest-related detainees have said: “They told us that if you publicize the case, it will get worse for your child.” These pressures allow cases to proceed secretly, without public oversight and without adequate defense. This secrecy paves the way for nighttime executions carried out without prior public notice—as seen in multiple previous cases such as Mohammad-Mehdi Karami, Majidreza Rahnavard, and Mohsen Shekari, all young protesters executed following the 2022 uprising. This case is yet another example of the dozens of similar sentences issued within Iran’s closed judicial and security apparatus—without the possibility of full defense and without independent oversight. It is a case that could at any moment turn into another covert execution unless public opinion and human-rights organizations intervene to expose the truth and halt the implementation of the sentence.

Tehran-Backed Groups Have Won 58 Seats In Iraq’s Parliament

In the sixth round of Iraq’s parliamentary elections, armed groups affiliated with Iran’s regime won 58 parliamentary seats. The results of the sixth parliamentary elections show that four armed groups, through their political branches, received more than 1.8 million votes. The growing influence of these armed groups in Iraq’s parliament comes despite previous warnings from the United States urging the Iraqi government to disband them. At the same time, news sources in Iraq confirmed internal disputes among Shia factions over a second term for Prime Minister Mohammed Shia’ al-Sudani.
IRGC Seizes Oil Tanker in Persian Gulf Waters
Iraq’s Election Commission had earlier told the Saudi-owned Al Arabiya network on November 16 that the parliamentary election results would be announced on Monday, November 17. According to the commission, the results have been finalized, and appeals will be accepted for three days starting the day after the announcement. Voting began on the morning of November 11. According to the Independent High Electoral Commission, 7,768 candidates were approved to compete for 329 parliamentary seats, including 2,248 women and 5,520 men. The total number of eligible voters was announced as 21,404,291, divided among general voting, voting by military and security personnel, and voting by displaced persons. The elections were held under the shadow of Iraq’s deep internal legitimacy crisis, the pervasive influence of Iran’s regime, and the uncertain future of Tehran’s proxy groups in the country. According to the election commission, about 40% of registered candidates were under forty. Reuters wrote that this reflects “the new generation’s effort to challenge the political dominance of old power networks.” Initial results indicated that al-Sudani’s coalition had won, and if Shia parties reached consensus, he could be selected for a second term as prime minister. Al-Sudani, chosen in 2022 as a compromise candidate to end the political deadlock after the previous elections, centered his campaign on improving public services, fighting corruption, and strengthening state authority. Since the fall of Iraq’s former regime, Iran’s regime has used its extensive influence to prevent the establishment of a democratic government. This political and military interference has contributed to the deaths of thousands of innocent people in the years following the war in Iraq.

Iran’s Regime Continue Execution Spree With 13 Hangings in Four Days

0
Thirteen prisoners were executed in the Sepidar Prison of Ahvaz, Vakilabad Prison of Mashhad, Sabzevar Prison, Zanjan Prison, Gorgan Prison, Taybad Prison, Bandar Abbas Prison, and Sari Prison. The executions took place between Thursday, November 13, and Monday, November 17.

Execution of four prisoners in Vakilabad Prison of Mashhad.

On the morning of Monday, November 17, four prisoners were executed in Vakilabad Prison of Mashhad. Their charges were described as drug-related. One of the prisoners was named Alimardan Barani. Another was an Afghan national named Shamsuddin. The identities of the two others are under review.
Iran’s ‘No To Execution Tuesdays’ Campaign Marks Ninety-Fifth Week

Execution of Reza Kamali in Sepidar Prison of Ahvaz.

At dawn on Monday, November 17, Reza Kamali was executed in Sepidar Prison of Ahvaz. His charge was listed as murder.

Execution of Alireza Keshavarz in Sabzevar Prison.

At dawn on Monday, November 17, Alireza Keshavarz was executed in Sabzevar Prison. He had previously been arrested on murder charges and sentenced to death.

Execution of Amir Farrokhnejad in Zanjan Prison.

On the morning of Monday, November 17, Amir Farrokhnejad was executed in Zanjan Prison. He had earlier been arrested on drug-related charges and sentenced to death.

Execution of Behzad Hosseini in Gorgan Prison.

At dawn on Monday, November 17, Behzad Hosseini was executed in Gorgan Prison. His charge was stated as murder.

Execution of two prisoners in Taybad Prison.

At dawn on Monday, November 17, two prisoners were executed in Taybad Prison. Their charges were described as drug-related. One of the prisoners was named Jafar Sattari. The identity of the second prisoner is under review.

Execution of Mosib Khalavand in Bandar Abbas Prison.

On the morning of Sunday, November 16, Mosib Khalavand was executed in Bandar Abbas Prison. His charge was described as drug-related.

Execution of two prisoners, including a woman, in Sari Prison.

At dawn on Thursday, November 13, two prisoners were executed in Sari Prison. Their names were Iraj Aghaei and Qomri Abbaszadeh. Iraj Aghaei, aged thirty, was from Rasht and living in Sari. He was a language instructor and owner of a language institute. His charge was described as drug-related. He denied the accusation until the last moment and insisted he was innocent. Qomri Abbaszadeh, aged twenty-nine, had been arrested six years earlier on murder charges and sentenced to death.

Iran’s ‘No To Execution Tuesdays’ Campaign Marks Ninety-Fifth Week

0
As part of the ongoing protests and hunger strikes by prisoners against the Iranian regime’s brutal executions, the “No to Execution Tuesdays” campaign has continued this week, entering its ninety-fifth week and taking place across 54 prisons in the country. Participants in this week’s campaign released a statement honoring the 1,500 people killed during the November 2019 uprising and wrote: “By remembering the martyrs of the November uprising—more than 1,500 women, men, and teenagers who sacrificed their lives for freedom, the oppressed who refused humiliation and rose up against tyranny and despotism—we insist on continuing their path until the complete abolition of executions and the achievement of freedom and equality. As long as oppression and injustice exist, Aban (November) continues.” (Aban is the Iranian month during which the November 2019 uprising took place.)
UN Rapporteur Warns About Execution of Six Iranian Political Prisoners
Full text of the “No to Execution Tuesdays” campaign statement Continuation of the “No to Execution Tuesdays” campaign in its ninety-fifth week across 54 different prisons In this week of the “No to Execution Tuesdays” campaign, we once again reaffirm our commitment to standing against the machinery of repression and state-sanctioned killing. By remembering the martyrs of the November uprising—more than 1,500 women, men, and teenagers who gave their lives for freedom, the oppressed who refused humiliation and rose up against tyranny—we insist on continuing their path until executions are entirely abolished and freedom and equality are achieved. As long as oppression and injustice continue, Aban (November) lives on. We enter the ninety-fifth week of this campaign as news emerges of the renewed confirmation of death sentences for three political prisoners in Ahvaz’s Sheiban Prison—Alireza Mardasi, Farshad E‘temadi-far, and Masoud Jame‘i. This once again reveals the depth of cruelty and the normalization of judicial-security violence against protesters and ordinary citizens. In the past week, a prisoner was executed in public in a medieval manner, and since October 23 (beginning of the Persian month Aban) the number of executions has exceeded 250—an alarming figure that reflects the catastrophic scale of repression and state violence in Iran. The “No to Execution Tuesdays” campaign, which has so far amplified the voices of families, activists, and death-row prisoners across 54 prisons in Iran, once again emphasizes: We, the people, are the only supporters and shield protecting prisoners from the gallows. We call on all freedom-seeking people of Iran—in every city, every neighborhood, and with any means at their disposal—not to remain silent in the face of this horrifying wave of executions and to raise their voice of protest in every possible form and at every level against the implementation of death sentences. We must support the families who, every week, stand with courage, grief, and hope outside prisons and judicial institutions to protest the impending execution of their loved ones. And once again, we emphasize that only through solidarity and collective protest can this machinery of killing be stopped. Political prisoners participating in the “No to Execution Tuesdays” campaign are on hunger strike on Tuesday, November 18, in the ninety-fifth week of the campaign across 54 prisons in the country.

Iranian Regime Deputy FM: Our Nuclear Program Is ‘Untouched’ And We Protect It

Saeed Khatibzadeh, the deputy foreign minister of Iran’s regime, stated that although U.S. and Israeli attacks have inflicted heavy damage on nuclear facilities in Iran, the regime’s nuclear program remains “untouched.” (Khatibzadeh is a senior diplomat and spokesperson of Iran’s regime; his comments were made to a foreign audience via CNN.) On Sunday, November 16, in an interview with CNN, Khatibzadeh said that Iran’s so-called peaceful nuclear program “at this moment as I speak to you, is untouched, and we will protect it.”
Iranian Regime Nuclear Chief: They Tell Us If You Touch Anything, We Will Attack Again
He added that Israeli and U.S. strikes have destroyed many infrastructures, buildings, and equipment tied to nuclear activities, but the regime’s nuclear program is “completely based on indigenous knowledge” and dispersed “across our vast country.” He said this is not a country you can bomb and think everything will be eliminated. U.S. President Donald Trump has repeatedly claimed that following U.S. strikes on the Natanz, Fordow, and Isfahan sites during the twelve-day war, the Iranian regime’s nuclear program has been destroyed. (Natanz and Fordow are major enrichment sites; Isfahan hosts nuclear conversion facilities.) However, speculation continues about the fate of the regime’s nuclear program, particularly its stockpile of enriched uranium. CNN reported on November 16 that, according to preliminary assessments by U.S. intelligence agencies, three of the regime’s nuclear sites have been severely damaged, but Tehran’s nuclear program has likely been set back only by about two years.

Iranian regime’s insistence on continuing enrichment

Khatibzadeh, repeating the regime’s previous positions, told CNN that the regime’s nuclear program has a “completely peaceful nature” and is pursued “only for energy production.” According to him, any potential negotiations between Tehran and Washington will only make sense if “Iran’s right to continue enrichment” is recognized. The deputy foreign minister of the regime added that the illusion of zero enrichment in Iran, or attempts to deprive Iran of its basic rights, will not be an acceptable option for Iran. He declined to answer whether Tehran is currently enriching uranium. Before the twelve-day war, five rounds of nuclear talks were held between Tehran and Washington, but the negotiations reached a deadlock due to the regime’s insistence on continuing enrichment on Iranian soil. Bloomberg reported on November 15 that after the war, the regime’s “nuclear ambiguity” has increased because Tehran has for months denied inspectors access to its facilities. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) stated in a confidential report on November 12 that since the Iran–Israel war, it has lost the ability to verify the regime’s stockpile of uranium enriched close to weapons-grade levels.

Praise for Iran’s “very close relations” with Russia and China

In another part of the CNN interview, Khatibzadeh stressed that Iran’s regime has “legitimate military programs” to “defend its national interests and security.” Answering a question about the fate of the regime’s missile program, he said the program is in a phase of “repair and recovery” after the twelve-day war. The deputy foreign minister added that Tehran has “very close relations” with Moscow and Beijing, relations that formed “long before recent developments.” (Russia and China have long been political and military partners of the Iranian regime.) On October 29, CNN reported that despite the return of UN sanctions banning the sale of weapons and missile equipment to Iran, Tehran is rebuilding its missile program with Beijing’s assistance. According to this report, a total of 2,000 tons of sodium perchlorate—the main component used to produce solid fuel for medium-range missiles—was shipped from China to Bandar Abbas after the twelve-day war.

At Free Iran Convention 2025, Mr. Mike Pompeo Calls for Firm Support to Iran’s Democratic Alternative

0
At the Free Iran Convention 2025 in Washington, D.C., former U.S. Secretary of State Mr. Mike Pompeo delivered a sweeping address outlining why he believes Iran’s path to freedom will come from within. Speaking to Iranian activists, scholars, and community leaders gathered to assess the growing momentum for political change, he described the moment as one defined by weakening authoritarianism, expanding internal resistance, and an emerging democratic alternative. Mr. Mike Pompeo opened by praising the event’s keynote speaker, calling Mrs. Maryam Rajavi’s remarks “inspiring,” and adding that he intended to pick up “precisely where she left us all.” The task ahead, he said, was “about forward.” He framed his remarks around two themes: Iran’s deteriorating situation under clerical rule and the capacity of its internal opposition to chart a different course. “This regime is weak,” he said. “It is more internationally isolated than ever.” He pointed to testimonies from Iranians inside the country about the “difficult” conditions they face and described a government that now relies almost entirely on fear. The “brutal suppression in 2022,” he noted, illustrated how deeply repression had become embedded in the state’s survival strategy. Mr. Mike Pompeo described an economy plagued by “mismanagement” and “poisonous corruption,” led by officials who “would simply rather take wealth than build it.” He also discussed the regime’s regional setbacks, noting that Hezbollah had become “a shadow of what it once was” and that in Syria, Bashar al-Assad was “no longer in control.” In this context, he said, the people of Syria now face a decisive choice between a future built on equality or a return to a model that had “so poorly served them for so many years.” He also highlighted the diminished capacity of Iran’s nuclear program. While stopping short of calling it fully defeated, Mr. Mike Pompeo said it was “absolutely fair” to assert that its ability to regenerate and function under air defense protection was now “massively diminished.” Reflecting on his years of government service, he addressed the recurring question: When will the regime fall? “These questions are impossible to answer,” he cautioned, comparing the uncertainty to his time patrolling the East German border during the Cold War. “Nobody could answer the central question… When will it fall?” Yet authoritarian regimes, he noted, often collapse “with unbelievable speed.” Mr. Mike Pompeo stressed that internal resistance—not external intervention—determines the timing. Change happens through “dedication and hard work,” he said, and through the efforts of those who build the capabilities the Resistance needs “for the moment that that day comes.” He warned sharply against appeasement, calling it “failure.” “If you appease tyrants, they will grow in power,” he said. Shipments of cash from Western countries, he argued, enable repression, fund terrorism, and strengthen the Revolutionary Guards. He reiterated the importance of starving the regime of money, credibility, and moral authority. Mr. Mike Pompeo also urged European leaders not to accept claims that no alternative exists. “Everyone in this room knows precisely that there is an alternative,” he said, describing it as a “free and independent, sovereign Iran delivered to it by its own people.” He noted that the democratic alternative supported by Mrs. Maryam Rajavi and the NCRI had shown its capability over more than four decades. He contrasted the NCRI’s approach with calls for foreign intervention. “It didn’t ask for American boots on the ground,” he said. “It didn’t ask for an external change of regime.” Instead, it sought support for the opposition and increased pressure on the ruling system. Mr. Mike Pompeo closed by urging unity and perseverance. “Hang together. Stay together,” he told attendees, emphasizing the need to support those resisting inside Iran. He expressed confidence that the Iranian people’s “God-given right” to a free society would eventually take root and predicted that one day he would stand with them to welcome a leadership “duly selected, elected by the people of Iran.” He ended his speech with a call to action and hope: “May God bless Madam Rajavi and God bless the great people of Iran.”

At Free Iran Convention 2025, Mrs. Maryam Rajavi Outlines Roadmap for Democratic Change

0
At the Free Iran Convention 2025 in Washington, D.C., Mrs. Maryam Rajavi delivered the keynote address to an audience of Iranian activists, scholars, and community leaders gathered to examine Iran’s rapidly shifting political landscape. Her speech centered on a single overarching question: How can meaningful change be realized in Iran? Mrs. Maryam Rajavi opened by marking the sixth anniversary of the November 2019 uprising, calling it a turning point that “shook the very foundations of the religious dictatorship.” She saluted the protesters who were killed and described the moment as a reminder of the “grave and sensitive circumstances” Iran now faces.
FreeIran2025: Convention in Washington, D.C.
Throughout her remarks, Mrs. Maryam Rajavi returned repeatedly to one premise: the overthrow of the ruling system is “both necessary and timely.” She argued that the regime has reached “the final phase of its winter,” after years of prioritizing “repression, plunder, and warmongering.” According to her, these same tools have now trapped the state, leaving it weakened “from every angle.” She pointed to wide-ranging social pressures building across the country. Mrs. Maryam Rajavi described women and young people facing chronic unemployment and low wages, millions living in shantytowns forming “a powder keg poised to erupt,” and a labor force pushed to the limit by inflation, shortages, and collapsing infrastructure. The tragic self-immolation of Ahvaz resident Ahmad Baledi, she said, offered “a stark illustration of the explosive state of Iranian society.” Mrs. Maryam Rajavi cited thousands of annual protests by workers, teachers, nurses, and retirees as evidence of “a surging river, driving inexorably toward the overthrow of the clerical regime.” She referenced the “sea of blood” resulting from more than 100,000 executed members of the Resistance, framing this as the backdrop against which the current wave of unrest has taken shape. A core section of her speech focused on the regime’s inability to enact reforms. Mrs. Maryam Rajavi listed three points: the state cannot make political or social changes, the economic decline is “uncontrollable,” and despite the costs of regional interventions and the nuclear program, its leadership “is unable to change course.” She challenged the notion that the system could be moderated, noting that the MEK attempted reforms during the regime’s early years, only to face killings and later mass executions. Mrs. Maryam Rajavi warned that figures branded as “reformists” had roots in earlier waves of repression, saying these labels masked the continuation of the same hardline policies. Turning to foreign policy, she sharply criticized decades of Western engagement. The “policy of appeasement,” Mrs. Maryam Rajavi argued, enabled the regime’s expansion, facilitated its nuclear progress, and “blocked the path to democratic change.” She highlighted the blacklisting of the MEK, the bombing of its bases, and the disarming of the National Liberation Army as steps “carried out at the direct request of the clerical regime.” Mrs. Maryam Rajavi then restated what she called the “Third Option,” first presented in the European Parliament: “neither appeasement nor war,” but the overthrow of the regime “by the Iranian people and their organized Resistance.” She said recent regional conflict underscored that appeasement had failed and demonstrated that foreign military intervention would not bring change. Emphasizing the role of Iran’s younger generation, Mrs. Maryam Rajavi recalled how the 2019 uprising revealed “hundreds of thousands of bold, courageous young fighters.” She described the Resistance Units as an expanding force inside Iran and noted the executions of MEK supporters, including Behrouz Ehsani and Mehdi Hassani in July, as proof of the regime’s fear of this network. She credited the PMOI’s decades of organization and sacrifice as “an invaluable asset in paving the way to liberty,” saying the future depended on “self-sacrificing individuals unafraid to give their lives.” Mrs. Maryam Rajavi closed by outlining the NCRI’s program for a future Iran: a democratic republic, free elections, separation of religion and state, gender equality, and autonomy for nationalities. She stressed, “We are not fighting to seize power. Our goal is to return sovereignty to the people of Iran.” After the regime’s fall, she said, a provisional government would oversee elections for a Constituent Assembly to draft a new constitution. Calling on governments to recognize the Iranian people’s struggle and the actions of “rebellious youth against the Revolutionary Guards,” Mrs. Maryam Rajavi ended with a clear message: “Victory be yours.”

Iranian Regime Nuclear Chief: They Tell Us If You Touch Anything, We Will Attack Again

Mohammad Eslami, head of the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran (AEOI)—an official appointed by the Iranian regime—again repeated the regime’s accusations against the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). He said Iran remains under pressure and is told that if it takes any action, it will be attacked again. For non-Iranian readers: the AEOI is the regime’s nuclear authority responsible for all nuclear facilities. On Sunday, November 16, at a state-run conference titled “International Law Under Attack, Aggression and Defense,” Eslami said: “We are constantly facing threats. Every day we are threatened that if you take any action, we will attack again.” The United States and Israel have repeatedly emphasized that they will not allow Iran’s regime to acquire a nuclear weapon.
IAEA Director: Iran Must Improve Cooperation to Prevent Tensions with West
During the 12-day war between Israel and Iran’s regime, seven B-2 bombers took off from Whiteman Air Force Base in the United States as part of “Operation Midnight Hammer” and targeted the regime’s nuclear sites.

Repeated criticism of the IAEA

Eslami also repeated his criticism of the IAEA on Sunday, saying: “The first place Israel bombed in the 12-day war was a factory that produced plate fuel for the Tehran reactor, and the information about this location was only in the possession of the International Atomic Energy Agency.” In the latest round of meetings of the G7 foreign ministers, the group called on Iran’s regime to fully cooperate with the IAEA. But Eslami said: “Before seeking to prepare a new modality, the Agency must first redefine itself and determine its position and responsibility regarding conditions in which a military attack has taken place and facilities have been damaged, and on that basis engage in dialogue with us.” He added that unless a procedure for the Agency’s inspections is defined, political pressure on Iran’s regime will have no effect. At the same time, Mohammad Marandi, a former adviser to Tehran’s nuclear negotiating team under Ebrahim Raisi, announced that Iran’s regime “will not provide any unnecessary information” to the IAEA. For non-Iranian readers: Marandi frequently appears in state-run media as a commentator defending regime nuclear policies.

Araghchi: We are in dialogue with the Agency

At the same time, Abbas Araghchi, the current foreign minister of Iran’s regime, said on Sunday that there are rules for working with the IAEA, and cooperation will continue as long as those rules are respected. Araghchi reported that the ambassadors of Iran’s regime, Russia, and China met with the IAEA director-general, saying that dialogue is ongoing between Tehran and the Agency. He said there are no undeclared enrichment facilities in Iran and that enrichment is currently not taking place because the facilities were attacked. On November 12, the International Atomic Energy Agency stated in a confidential report that since the U.S. and Israeli attacks on nuclear facilities in Iran during the 12-day war, it has lost the ability to verify Iran’s stockpile of uranium enriched close to weapons-grade levels. According to the Agency’s latest official report in September, Iran’s regime possesses 440.9 kilograms of uranium enriched up to 60%, a level only one technical step away from 90% weapons-grade enrichment. The director-general of the IAEA has warned that this amount of uranium could be sufficient to produce up to ten nuclear bombs if Iran decided to build such weapons, although he emphasized that no such decision has been made.

Iran’s regime concerned about a new resolution at the IAEA Board of Governors

Kazem Gharibabadi, a deputy foreign minister of Iran’s regime, expressed concern on Sunday at the margins of the state-run conference about a possible new resolution against the regime at the IAEA Board of Governors. For non-Iranian readers: Gharibabadi previously served as Iran’s ambassador to the IAEA. He said: “If a resolution is presented and adopted at the Board of Governors meeting, our situation will be different, and we will fundamentally reconsider our approach, and Iran must re-examine its policies regarding interaction with the Agency and issues related to the Non-Proliferation Treaty.” He added: “It is not that this resolution has an effect, but rather the message it sends, and this resolution sends the message that interaction and cooperation are not important to them.” Earlier, Iran’s regime’s permanent mission to the UN in Vienna wrote on X on Friday night that the United States and three European countries intend to present a draft resolution against Tehran at next week’s IAEA Board of Governors meeting. The IAEA Board of Governors is expected to address issues including Iran’s regime’s nuclear file in its upcoming meeting next Wednesday.