Saudi King Warns Iran’ Regime Over Trump’s Nuclear Proposal Amid Rising Tensions

In a rare diplomatic maneuver, Saudi Arabia’s King Salman bin Abdulaziz Al Saud sent a stark warning to Iran regime’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei last month, urging the regime to take U.S. President Donald Trump’s nuclear proposal seriously or risk the outbreak of war, particularly with Israel. According to four sources familiar with the matter—two Iranian regime officials and two Gulf government insiders—the message was delivered by the king’s son and Saudi Defense Minister, Prince Khalid bin Salman, during a secret visit to Tehran on April 17. The confidential letter, personally addressed to Khamenei, expressed Saudi Arabia’s deep concerns over escalating regional instability and the potential for military conflict.

A Confidential Visit Amid Escalating Threats

Prince Khalid’s trip, while reported in the media at the time, did not reveal the sensitive nature of his mission. It marked the first visit to Iran by a senior member of the Saudi royal family in over two decades. The confidential meeting took place at the Iranian regime presidential palace and included high-ranking Iranian regime officials: President Masoud Pezeshkian, Chief of Staff of the Armed Forces Mohammad Bagheri, and Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi. During the meeting, Prince Khalid—who served as Saudi Arabia’s ambassador to Washington during Trump’s first term—warned Iranian regime officials that Trump was impatient with drawn-out negotiations. According to two Arab sources, the Saudi envoy emphasized that the United States was seeking a swift resolution to the nuclear dispute and that the diplomatic window was rapidly closing. The visit came shortly after Trump unexpectedly announced that direct talks with Tehran were underway, aimed at curbing Iran regime’s nuclear ambitions in exchange for sanctions relief. Trump made the statement alongside Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in Washington, who was lobbying for a possible military strike on Iran’s nuclear sites.

A Stark Choice: Diplomacy or War

Sources indicated that King Salman’s message urged the Iranian regime leadership to choose diplomacy over confrontation, suggesting that reaching an agreement with Washington would be preferable to facing a potential Israeli military strike. “The region, already destabilized by conflicts in Gaza and Lebanon, cannot afford another war,” one source quoted Prince Khalid as saying. Reuters noted that neither Iranian nor Saudi officials responded to requests for comment on the meeting or the message.

A Fragile Detente

Tehran and Riyadh have historically been at odds, locked in a rivalry fueled by sectarian divisions, proxy conflicts, and the 2015 attacks on Saudi diplomatic missions in Iran. However, with Chinese mediation, diplomatic relations resumed in March 2022 after a years-long freeze. Despite the thaw, Iran regime’s regional influence has weakened over the past two years. Israeli operations have significantly damaged Tehran’s allies in Gaza and Lebanon, while the fall of Bashar al-Assad in Syria has further diminished Tehran’s regional posture. At the same time, Western sanctions have taken a severe toll on Iran’s oil-dependent economy. This new geopolitical context has allowed Saudi Arabia to increase its diplomatic leverage. Mohanad Haj Ali, Deputy Director for Research at the Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center, told Reuters that Saudi Arabia is keen to avoid a regional conflict that could derail its ambitious economic development plans.

Mixed Signals from Tehran

The impact of the Saudi warning on Iran regime’s leadership remains unclear. According to the sources, regime President Pezeshkian responded that the regime was open to a nuclear agreement that could relieve economic pressure by lifting sanctions. However, Iranian regime officials expressed skepticism over the Trump administration’s “unpredictable” approach—at times tolerating limited enrichment, while at other moments demanding a complete dismantling of Iran regime’s nuclear capabilities. Trump has made it clear that if diplomacy fails, military options are on the table. One Iranian source reported that Pezeshkian reaffirmed Tehran’s willingness to negotiate but made it clear that Iran ‘s regime would not abandon its enrichment program solely to appease the U.S. Ongoing nuclear talks between Tehran and Washington have so far gone through five rounds, but key issues—especially uranium enrichment—remain unresolved. Reuters reported earlier this week that Iran’s regime might consider temporarily halting enrichment if its frozen assets are released and its right to peaceful nuclear energy is acknowledged. However, this was later denied by Iran’s Foreign Ministry via the semi-official Fars news agency.

Riyadh’s Assurances and Warnings

In addition to the nuclear issue, Prince Khalid reportedly called on Iranian regime officials to review their broader regional policies. He emphasized that changes in Iran regime’s approach—especially its support for regional militias—would be welcomed by Riyadh and could help ease regional tensions. At the same time, the Saudi defense minister warned Tehran not to provoke the United States through direct actions or via its regional proxies. He underscored that Trump’s potential response would likely be far harsher than those of his predecessors, Barack Obama and Joe Biden. However, Prince Khalid also provided a key reassurance: Saudi Arabia would not allow its territory or airspace to be used for any U.S. or Israeli military operations against Iran.

Conclusion

The secret meeting and the confidential message from King Salman represent a significant moment in Gulf diplomacy. As tensions in the region simmer and the possibility of a major conflict looms, Saudi Arabia has positioned itself as both a cautious mediator and a strategic player, urging Iran to seize what may be a narrowing opportunity for a peaceful resolution.  

Khamenei’s Delusion: A Regime in Denial as Iran Crumbles

On May 28, 2025, Iran’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei stood before the Minister of Interior and provincial governors and delivered a speech so divorced from reality, it bordered on the surreal. At a time when Iran is facing some of its most severe social, economic, and security crises in decades, Khamenei painted a picture of calm, opportunity, and national stability. His remarks weren’t just misleading—they were a chilling display of hypocrisy, self-deception, and structural denial emblematic of regimes in terminal decline. In his own words, “Fortunately, there are many opportunities in the country… There is no particular problem in the country’s public atmosphere!” He continued, “We do not have a war, we do not have a disease, we do not have an acute security problem, nor are there any factional or political disputes, so the overall atmosphere in the country is now a good one.” This is not optimism. It is delusion. At that very moment, Iran was grappling with a surge in union protests, chronic electricity blackouts, a worsening bread and water crisis, soaring inflation, and an unprecedented collapse in public trust. Truck drivers, bakers, industrial workers, and educators are striking across the nation. Southern and central provinces are drying up. Power grids are failing. The middle class is vanishing. If this is Khamenei’s idea of “opportunity,” it is only so for the corrupt elite insulated from the daily hardships of ordinary Iranians. Khamenei’s narrative—calculated and cynical—is an attempt to overwrite a brutal reality with fiction. It seeks to delegitimize protest, deny pain, and discredit the public’s demands for change. But the contradictions between his words and the truth on the ground are impossible to ignore. Consider the explosion in Bandar Abbas or the mass protests in Khuzestan and Isfahan over water and electricity shortages. Though state media tried to bury these events, they exploded across social media, amplifying the voices of a nation in crisis. Khamenei went on to advise officials to “go among the people, participate in their gatherings, listen to what they say… be patient.” These hollow platitudes are grotesque coming from the head of a regime that jails, tortures, and kills protesters. A government built on systematic repression cannot redeem itself through superficial gestures or false empathy. The people’s demands have moved far beyond being “heard.” They want the end of tyranny. They want real accountability. They want change. His speech reached new levels of contradiction when he referred to corruption as a “seven-headed dragon,” warning that the corruption of officials is especially damaging due to their positions of authority. Yet the Iranian people know exactly where corruption lives—it is not at the bottom of the ladder but entrenched at the very top. For over four decades, this regime has institutionalized corruption: from massive embezzlements in banks and public funds to widespread fraud in municipal and religious foundations. This is not an aberration. It is the system. Khamenei’s insistence on a “desirable atmosphere” in the country is a desperate attempt to maintain control over a society that is increasingly slipping through the regime’s fingers. Iran is hemorrhaging talent in a wave of elite migration and capital flight. The generational rift between the rulers and the ruled grows deeper each day. Trade unions, professors, teachers, and workers have joined hands in an unprecedented movement of civil resistance. The only atmosphere they feel is one of suffocation. To speak of unity, reform, or dialogue while clinging to unchecked power is to mock the suffering of a nation. When people are deprived not only of bread, water, and electricity, but of dignity itself, no number of staged speeches or forced smiles can restore legitimacy. Khamenei’s regime is not facing a crisis—it is the crisis. The message from the people of Iran is no longer a plea for reform. It is a demand for an end. An end to repression, to corruption, to lies—and to the regime that has brought them all.  

Iran’s Truckers’ Strike: A Growing Movement That Could Shake the Regime

A nationwide truck drivers’ strike is rapidly gaining momentum across Iran, posing one of the most serious challenges to the regime in recent years. What began on May 22 in the strategic port city of Bandar Abbas has now spread to more than 150 cities in just nine days, paralyzing large parts of the country’s transportation network. As the movement grows, so does its potential to ignite a broader civil resistance. Initially sparked by cuts to fuel quotas, the strike has quickly evolved into a powerful display of collective disobedience, revealing deep structural grievances among Iran’s working class. Videos circulating on social media show empty highways in cities like Marivan and Bandar Abbas—once bustling with traffic, now eerily quiet. These silent roads tell a story louder than slogans ever could.
Farmers, Workers, and Truck Drivers Hold Protest Rallies in Iran
In a statement, the truckers’ union expressed gratitude to the many Iranians who have joined in solidarity: “This unity and solidarity are the result of your will. Thank you to all the drivers, teachers, retirees, workers, and freedom-loving citizens who joined us. Our path is clear, and we will insist on it.”

More Than Just Fuel Prices

The demands of the striking truckers are straightforward yet urgent: fair fuel pricing, adequate insurance coverage, and freight rates that reflect the soaring cost of living. Yet, this strike is about more than economics—it is a protest against the corruption, mismanagement, and failure of the government to meet even the most basic needs of its citizens. Iran’s truck drivers, who earn less than €200 a month while paying European-level prices for food and essentials, have become the face of a deeper national crisis. With over 60 percent of Iranians struggling to meet daily calorie needs, the truckers’ plight reflects a broader collapse in living standards. Since 2011, the Iranian rial has lost 98 percent of its value, and inflation remains above 40 percent. Social media is flooded with messages and videos documenting this hardship: long lines, empty fridges, and families grappling with everyday survival. This is the reality of Iran today.

A Unique Challenge for the Regime

What makes this strike particularly difficult for the regime to contain is its structure. Iran’s freight sector is highly decentralized, with over 550,000 drivers operating 433,000 trucks—93 percent of them privately owned. Most truckers own their vehicles and have not broken any laws by refusing to work. They are not calling for regime change, nor are they engaging in violent protest. They are simply saying: We cannot go on like this. This ambiguity has placed the regime in a precarious position. Suppressing the strike with force risks escalating the crisis. Offering concessions, meanwhile, could be interpreted as weakness—especially at a time when the regime is engaged in sensitive nuclear negotiations with the United States. Despite this, the government has begun cracking down. At least 20 people have been arrested so far, including drivers accused of filming and sharing footage of the strike with foreign media outlets.

Echoes of 1979 and 2019

Iran has a long history of economic protests morphing into political uprisings. In 2019, a sudden 200 percent hike in gasoline prices triggered the “Bloody November” uprising, which quickly turned into an anti-regime revolt and was met with brutal violence. The truckers’ strike carries a similar warning. Analysts suggest that if other critical sectors—such as bus and train operators or energy workers—join the strike, the country could face a total shutdown reminiscent of the mass strikes that led to the fall of the Shah in 1979. The regime is reportedly using trucks affiliated with the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) to keep goods moving, but experts warn this is not a sustainable solution. If the truckers’ demands remain unmet, the strike could spread further, drawing in other unions, students, teachers, and marginalized groups already expressing solidarity.

A Movement Fueled by Both Desperation and Hope

Unlike many previous protests, this strike is not framed as a direct challenge to the regime. Yet its impact is deeply political. It exposes the regime’s vulnerabilities and the growing distance between the ruling elite and the people. It is a movement fueled not only by desperation but by a growing hope—for justice, for dignity, and for a better future. As strikes continue and inflation climbs, Iran may be approaching a critical turning point. Economic strikes are uniquely disruptive: they are nonviolent, legally ambiguous, and deeply resonant with the population. They don’t chant slogans—but they stop the country. The truckers’ strike, spreading day by day, may yet become the engine of a broader transformation in Iran.  

Austrian Intelligence: Iran’s Regime is Actively Pursuing Nuclear Weapons

Fox News, citing a new intelligence report from Austrian officials, has reported that Iran’s regime is still actively advancing its nuclear weapons program — a program that, according to the report, could be used in launching long-range missiles. Fox News in its report wrote that: “The startling intelligence gathering of Austrian officials contradicts the assessment of the U.S. Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI).” Tulsi Gabbard, Director of National Intelligence of the United States, had stated in a March session of the U.S. Senate Intelligence Committee that the U.S. intelligence community “continues to assess that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon and Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has not authorized the nuclear weapons program he suspended in 2003.” Austrian intelligence report However, the Austrian Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution, which functions similarly to the FBI in the U.S. in terms of domestic security, wrote in an intelligence report on Monday: “In order to assert and enforce its regional political power ambitions, the Islamic Republic of Iran is striving for comprehensive rearmament, with nuclear weapons to make the regime immune to attack and to expand and consolidate its dominance in the Middle East and beyond.” Fox News, which obtained a copy of the report, added that the document also states: “The Iranian nuclear weapons development program is well advanced, and Iran possesses a growing arsenal of ballistic missiles capable of delivering nuclear warheads over long distances.” The intelligence document states: “Iran has developed sophisticated sanctions-evasion networks, which has benefited Russia.” According to Fox News, the Austrian intelligence findings could hinder negotiations between the United States and Iran’s regime over resolving the nuclear crisis, as the data presented in the report indicate that Iran’s regime has no intention of giving up its pursuit of nuclear weapons. In response to this report, a White House official told Fox News Digital: “President Trump is committed to Iran never obtaining a nuclear weapon or the capacity to build one.” In this 211-page report, which addresses serious threats to Austria’s democracy, Iran’s regime is mentioned 99 times as a state sponsor of terrorism and as possessing an illegal nuclear weapons program. The Austrian intelligence agency stated that “Vienna is home to one of the largest embassies of the Islamic Republic of Iran in Europe, which disguises intelligence officers with diplomatic.” In 2021, a court in Belgium convicted Asadollah Asadi, an Iranian regime diplomat stationed in Vienna, for planning a bombing at a gathering of the Iranian Resistance on the outskirts of Paris in 2018. The event was attended by tens of thousands of people, including politicians and lawmakers from across the world. Differences between European and U.S. intelligence reports David Albright, founder and president of the Institute for Science and International Security in Washington, D.C., told Fox News Digital about the difference in assessments between the U.S. Office of the Director of National Intelligence and the Austrian Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution: “The ODNI report is stuck in the past, a remnant of the fallacious unclassified 2007 NIE [National Intelligence Estimate].” A spokesperson for the U.S. Office of the Director of National Intelligence declined to comment, and both the U.S. State Department and National Security Council did not respond to Fox News Digital’s inquiries on the matter. In 2023, Fox News Digital published new intelligence documents showing that Iran’s regime had attempted to circumvent U.S. and EU sanctions to acquire the technology needed for its nuclear weapons program and move toward testing a nuclear bomb. According to reports from European intelligence agencies, Iran’s regime has continued its illegal efforts to obtain technologies used in nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons programs both before and after the 2015 nuclear agreement (JCPOA). The Austrian intelligence report also mentions Iran’s regime supplying weapons to U.S.-sanctioned terrorist groups such as Hamas and Hezbollah, as well as to Syrian militias.

75% Of Iranians Live Below the Poverty Line

As public protests against Iran’s regime grow louder by the day, Isa Kalantari, former agriculture minister and a longtime official within the regime, has declared: “In these 46 years, we have destroyed Iran.” In an interview with the state-run Entekhab website, Kalantari pointed to the unprecedented spread of poverty across the country, stating: “About three-fourths of the Iranian people—that is, something between 70% to 75%—are living below the poverty line.” This figure starkly contrasts with official statistics, which typically claim that 30% to 40% of the population lives below the poverty line. He also warned that the excessive exploitation of the country’s underground water resources has led to severe land subsidence in some areas—so much so that parts of the city of Isfahan are now effectively “standing on six meters of air.” What sets Kalantari’s remarks apart is his previous high-ranking position within the formal power structure: a senior official now openly speaking of the “destruction of the country” as a consequence of the Iranian regime’s rule. A key point in such remarks is that the criticism is coming from within the regime and from individuals who themselves played a role in creating the current situation. Isa Kalantari presents this shocking statistic while clearly directing his criticism at the leader of Iran’s regime, Ali Khamenei, and the commanders of the Revolutionary Guards—even if he does not name them explicitly. He describes the regime’s overarching economic policies as “anti-development” and stresses that a country cannot be governed through poverty—a sentiment increasingly echoed among critical officials. With his startling claim that 75% of the population lives below the poverty line, Kalantari directly challenges the official narrative of the Iranian regime. Yet his remarks reflect a deeper crisis: the voice of dissent and criticism against the regime’s supreme leader and the Revolutionary Guards is now being heard not just from protesters in the streets, but from within the ruling establishment itself. This is the very rift that, through years of recurring popular uprisings, has grown wider by the day and now questions the regime’s cohesion. In this context, issues such as the systemic corruption of the Revolutionary Guards (IRGC) in the areas of sanctions, oil smuggling, opposition to the FATF, and financial profiteering from hostility toward the United States and Israel have increasingly become topics of discussion within the ruling establishment. The IRGC, acting as the main oil vendor, pockets the primary profits from sanctions under the guise of circumventing them, while the cost of this approach is borne by the people through poverty and unemployment. IRGC commanders, who have effectively replaced the National Iranian Oil Company and the Central Bank, are now selling oil to China at a discount. The payments remain frozen in Chinese banks in the form of yuan, and Iran is forced to import overpriced and low-quality Chinese goods in exchange. A recent example was the purchase of three second-hand Airbus planes from China at three times their actual value—an explicit example of corruption under the label of sanctions circumvention.
Double the Price, None of the Promise: Corruption Behind Iran’s Aircraft Barter Deal
At the top of these “sanctions profiteers” are the IRGC commanders. According to Mohammad Hossein Adeli, former head of Iran’s Central Bank, the volume of rent-seeking, losses, and corruption resulting from sanctions exceeds 50 billion dollars. But the issue doesn’t stop there. One of the major obstacles to economic recovery is the opposition by Khamenei and the IRGC to fully adopting the FATF (Financial Action Task Force). The main reason for this opposition is to prevent the disclosure of financial transactions related to supporting its proxy groups in the region. As a result, Iran has remained on the FATF blacklist for more than eight years. The consequence has been financial isolation, lack of foreign investment, and a worsening economic crisis. Former officials of Iran’s regime now openly admit that the country is on the wrong path. But this is nothing new—and it appears that these criminal officials are trying to downplay or deflect their own role in the current situation. However, the Iranian opposition—led by the National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI) under Mrs. Maryam Rajavi—has repeatedly affirmed the reality that all factions of the regime bear responsibility for the current crisis. The only path to liberation for the Iranian people and the region from the clerics’ rule is through their overthrow by the Iranian people themselves.  

Iran’s Regime Ties Nuclear Pause to U.S. Concessions

Two Iranian sources told Reuters on Wednesday, May 28, 2025, that Tehran might halt uranium enrichment as part of a “political agreement,” provided that the United States unfreezes Iran’s blocked assets and recognizes Tehran’s right to enrich uranium for civilian purposes. Such an agreement could pave the way for a comprehensive nuclear deal. According to these sources, who are close to the negotiating team, if Washington accepts Tehran’s conditions, a political understanding with the United States could be reached soon. One of the sources said that this issue has not yet been raised in discussions with the United States.
Iranian Regime Accelerates Uranium Enrichment to Concerning Levels
The Iranian sources stressed that Tehran will not agree to halt its nuclear program, dismantle its infrastructure, or seal its nuclear facilities, as demanded by the Trump administration. Meanwhile, Iran’s regime has still not been able to access the 6 billion dollars deposited in a Qatari bank—an amount that was unfrozen in 2023 during a prisoner exchange between the U.S. and Iran under Joe Biden’s administration. The second source acknowledged that Tehran wants these funds transferred to Iran without any conditions or restrictions. If it is necessary to lift certain sanctions for this to happen, then that should be done. International Atomic Energy Agency that a new report on Iran’s nuclear program will be released soon. Rafael Grossi, Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), announced that the agency will “soon” release its new report on the nuclear program of the Iranian regime. On Wednesday, he added that the report will be comprehensive. The release of a comprehensive report on the Iranian regime’s nuclear program is a step toward potentially triggering the snapback mechanism for the automatic reimposition of sanctions against Iran’s regime.    

Iran’s Gasoline Smuggling Crisis Exposes Systemic Corruption and Military Involvement

Iran is grappling with an unprecedented gasoline smuggling crisis, with new estimates suggesting that up to 50 million liters of fuel are illegally exported from the country each day. This staggering figure has cast serious doubt on the Iranian regime’s long-standing narrative that blames small-time border smugglers for the losses. Instead, mounting evidence points to a well-organized, large-scale operation involving institutional complicity at the highest levels.

A $4 Billion Drain on the Iranian Economy

According to Alireza Rashidian, head of Iran’s Central Headquarters for Combating Goods and Currency Smuggling, the daily average of smuggled fuel now stands at around 20 million liters, primarily diesel and gasoil. Speaking to Tasnim News Agency, Rashidian noted that substantial amounts of subsidized fuel meant for power plants and agricultural use have been systematically diverted into illicit markets in recent years.
Fuel Smuggling Mafia and the Policy of Concealment in Iran  
He added that a pilot monitoring scheme in five provinces had uncovered nearly 69,000 cases of irregularities by tracking around 200,000 fuel shipments—further underscoring the scale and complexity of the smuggling network.

Implausibility of the Small-Scale Smuggler Narrative

The regime often attributes smuggling to low-level operators who use 2,000–2,500-liter tanks mounted on Nissan Junior pickup trucks. However, simple logistics expose the flaws in this claim. Transporting 50 million liters would require at least 20,000 such trucks, forming a convoy stretching over 140 kilometers if lined up with minimal spacing. Even the more conservative figure of 20 million liters would necessitate 8,000 vehicles, making it impossible for these operations to occur undetected and unaided by officials. Alternatively, using large tanker trucks capable of holding 40,000 liters would still require 500 to 1,250 trucks per day, depending on the volume smuggled.

Signs of Systematic and Institutionalized Corruption

The volume of fuel being trafficked, combined with the infrastructure required, strongly suggests that fuel smuggling is systemic. Reports of underground fuel pipelines and unmonitored maritime routes—especially from ports under the control of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC)—reinforce suspicions of official involvement. In 2023, Mohammad Jafari, Deputy Head of the Headquarters for Combating the Smuggling of Goods, admitted that up to 25% of fuel allocated to power plants is being siphoned off for smuggling, though he did not disclose specifics. The implication is clear: large portions of Iran’s fuel distribution network are compromised.

Arrests of Officials Linked to Smuggling

High-profile arrests over the past few years have further highlighted institutional involvement:
  • In December 2022, Aref Akbari, Public and Revolutionary Prosecutor of Hormozgan Province, announced the arrest of six rural mayors, three Ministry of Industry employees, and two members of the Engineering Organization for issuing fraudulent permits that allowed fake claims to subsidized fuel.
  • In May 2021, Saeed Rashki, Public and Revolutionary Prosecutor of Iranshahr, revealed that nearly all employees of the local oil company had been arrested in connection with a major smuggling case. One of the key suspects was the head of a local parliamentarian’s office.
These cases illustrate how networks of corruption stretch across various levels of government, providing the necessary cover for massive fuel diversion operations.

The IRGC’s Pivotal Role

One of the most alarming aspects of the crisis is the alleged involvement of Iran’s armed forces—particularly the IRGC. As a powerful military and economic force, the IRGC controls much of Iran’s transportation infrastructure and border security. Given this control, it is highly improbable that millions of liters of fuel could be smuggled daily without their oversight or direct participation. Numerous reports have implicated IRGC-controlled ports and border crossings in smuggling activities, with small cargo ships operating clandestinely under military protection. Observers argue that fuel trafficking helps fund the IRGC’s regional operations and off-the-books expenditures, making it a lucrative and politically protected enterprise.

Conclusion

Iran’s fuel smuggling crisis is no longer a case of petty cross-border theft. The sheer volume of stolen fuel, estimated to cost the Iranian economy $4 billion annually, combined with growing evidence of state and military complicity, paints a disturbing picture of institutionalized corruption. As long as key power centers like the IRGC remain above the law, and government entities continue to profit from opaque fuel distribution schemes, there is little hope that this crisis can be resolved. Instead, it threatens to deepen the country’s economic woes and further erode public trust in state institutions.  

Truckers’ Strike Spreads to 125 Cities Across Iran

At the end of the fifth day of the strike, the Union of Truckers and Drivers of Iran stated that there had been “an exceptional show of solidarity and unity” during the nationwide strike that has spread to 125 cities. The statement added: “With hope and unity, we welcome the sixth day, with the belief that we will continue the path until our demands are met.” The statement continued: “Since the beginning of this path on May 22, thousands of honorable drivers and truckers have joined us. This solidarity is a great honor that reflects a shared understanding and a common aspiration for a better future.” The union added in its statement that despite the “hardship and pressure” during the strike days, “our voice of unity has grown louder and our steps more resolute.”
Truckers’ Strike in Iran Enters Fourth Consecutive Day
The latest round of protests by drivers and truckers began on May 19 in Bandar Abbas, following a call by the Union of Truckers and Drivers of Iran. Protesters went on strike by halting operations at the port’s entry and exit points. The union issued a statement saying: “We went on strike because we demand our rights. We stood together because our unity is the only thing that can turn this wheel in our favor.” The strike continued in a coordinated manner on May 22, with truckers in dozens of Iranian cities also halting work. Protesting drivers have said they will strike for one week in response to the reduction in diesel fuel quotas, high insurance costs, low freight rates, and other unmet professional demands.

Tehran Bus Workers’ Syndicate Backs Truckers’ Strike

On May 26, the Syndicate of Workers of Tehran and Suburbs Bus Company issued a statement in support of the nationwide truckers’ strike, stating: “Striking and protesting is a legal right of drivers and all workers.” The statement identified key demands of the truckers, including: “clarification of insurance entitlements, enforcement of government commitments to pay the insurance share for owner-operators, reduction of freight brokerage commissions, and an end to corruption and discrimination in the cargo allocation process.” Among the videos circulated from the strike, there are rare images of the country’s main transit routes appearing unusually empty, with barely any cargo trucks in sight. Other videos show truckers staging coordinated protests in various cities. As the strike by truckers and heavy vehicle drivers expanded, Kamran Mir Haji, the Prosecutor General of Fars Province, announced that legal cases were being filed to enable “judicial action” against a number of these drivers. On Monday, May 26, Mir Haji stated that judicial measures had been taken against several individuals accused of “disrupting the operations of drivers and truckers” in Fars province, some of whom had been arrested and others who now face legal proceedings. Earlier, on Sunday, May 25, Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, the Speaker of the regime’s Majlis (parliament), addressed the truckers’ issues, and Adel Najafzadeh, the representative from Khoy, warned about the “collapse of the national transportation fleet.” In a statement on May 25, the Union of Truckers and Drivers of Iran reported that police forces had attacked some of their colleagues with pepper spray and arrested several of them.  

Iran: Execution of Pedram Madani in Ghezel Hesar Prison

In the early hours of Wednesday, May 28, Pedram Madani, a 41-year-old prisoner, was executed in Ghezel Hesar Prison in Karaj. This act has sparked a wave of protests from human rights activists and his family. The judiciary of Iran’s regime carried out the execution based on vague charges and a case filled with legal flaws. Pedram Madani was arrested in 2020 and charged with activities related to intelligence and security. According to his family and human rights defenders, the accusations were not backed by documented evidence but were instead based solely on “confessions” obtained under pressure and without access to a chosen lawyer. In a video message, his mother emphasized the illegal torture and pressure during interrogations, saying: “My son only had a court-appointed lawyer, and his case is full of ambiguity and flaws.”
Execution Wave in Iran: Six More Prisoners Hanged
On May 25, Madani was transferred from Evin Prison to Ghezel Hesar. At the same time, his family was summoned for a final visit, a sign that human rights activists interpreted as confirmation that the execution was imminent. Pedram Madani’s death sentence was overturned three times by the Supreme Court, yet each time the parallel branch reinstated the death penalty. In this context, Olivier Grondeau, a French citizen and former inmate of Evin Prison who was imprisoned in Iran for over two and a half years, released a video message in Persian calling for the execution of Madani to be stopped. He said: “Pedram was one of the kindest cellmates I had. I cannot believe such a person deserves to be executed. He was the twentieth of my friends taken to Ghezel Hesar for execution.” Pedram Madani’s mother, who had previously lost her husband due to the sorrow caused by their son’s imprisonment, tearfully warned: “Don’t let another family be plunged into mourning. This sentence is unjust.” Despite repeated warnings from international bodies, Iran’s regime once again moved ahead with an execution, without a fair trial—a course that has claimed the lives of many young people in recent months. The execution of Pedram Madani took place amid a legal and judicial environment that, according to experts, is increasingly drifting away from standards of justice, transparency, and accountability. Earlier, on April 29, Mohsen Langarneshin was also executed under similar charges without a public and fair trial in one of the country’s prisons. According to observers, this reflects a growing pattern of brutal suppression under the guise of “law” against political and ideological detainees in Iran.  

Iranian Regime’s Deputy Minister of Intelligence for Internal Security Wanted by FBI

 The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) has released the photo and personal details of Seyed Yahya Hosseiny Panjaki, also known as Seyed Yahya Hamidi, the deputy minister of intelligence for internal security in Iran’s regime. The FBI has placed him on its wanted list and is seeking information about him. In the FBI notice published on Monday, May 26, Seyed Yahya Hosseiny is identified as being born on January 23, 1975, and as the deputy minister of intelligence in charge of Israel-related affairs. FBI stated:“Seyed Yahya is wanted for questioning in connection with alleged worldwide lethal plots and terror activity using intelligence networks, operational networks, and cyber capabilities, including via cooperation between the MOIS and Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC).” Seyed Yahya Hosseiny is the chief architect of operations by the Ministry of Intelligence to assassinate opponents of Iran’s regime abroad. The regime’s Ministry of Intelligence, alongside the IRGC’s Intelligence Organization, has for years carried out the regime’s most important acts of sabotage abroad. The notice adds that:“The Directorate for Internal Security is responsible for operating the Naji Sharifi Zindashti criminal network and their associates as they targeted United States-based Iranian dissidents from at least December 2020, until or around March of 2021.” FBI continued:“Seyed Yahya is the superior of Iranian Intelligence Officer Reza Hamidi Ravari, who is also wanted for questioning.” He holds a PhD in political science from Azad University of Tabriz and has published two academic articles—one titled “The Role of Rumors and Hybrid Threats in the Security Environment,” published in the Ministry of Defense’s National Security quarterly, and another titled “Takfiri Terrorism in Cyberspace and Strategies to Counter It,” published in the Strategic Cyber Space Studies quarterly of Iran’s Supreme National Defense University. Hosseiny Panjaki has been sanctioned by the European Union and the United Kingdom for his involvement in a 2018 bombing plot in Paris. The target was the annual gathering of the National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI), the largest opposition coalition to Iran’s regime. The plan was foiled by law enforcement before it could be carried out. Within the Ministry of Intelligence, he founded the “Martyr Soleimani Headquarters,” which carries out sabotage operations around the world in cooperation with Iran’s intelligence agencies and with the assistance of IRGC forces. The name of this headquarters refers to the Iranian regime’s plan to avenge the killing of Qassem Soleimani, the former commander of the Quds Force. Yahya Hosseiny has very close ties with the IRGC and has traveled multiple times to Syria and Lebanon, collaborating with Hezbollah and the Quds Force through intelligence sharing between the Ministry of Intelligence, the IRGC, and their operational teams. In addition to serving as deputy for internal security, Yahya Hosseiny is also in charge of the Israel desk at the Ministry of Intelligence. The leader of Iran’s regime has prioritized offensive operations against Israel, and as a result, more financial and human resources have been allocated to this section. Before Yahya Hosseiny, Saeed Hashemi Moqaddam held the position of deputy for internal security at the Ministry of Intelligence. Hashemi Moqaddam, 62 years old and one of the older directors of the Ministry of Intelligence, was also sanctioned by the European Union and the United Kingdom after the Paris bombing plot was exposed. Although the internal security deputy position remains on the EU sanctions list, Yahya Hosseiny’s name has not yet been added to that list.