Iran Human RightsIRAN: Prudent Use of Death Penalty Necessary, according to...

IRAN: Prudent Use of Death Penalty Necessary, according to Justice Minister

-

Iran Focus

London, 5 October – On October 3, the National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI) reported on comments made by the Iranian regime’s Justice Minister, Mostafa Pour-Mohammad, regarding abolishing death penalty for drug traffickers in Iran.  He said, “One of the punishments for a corrupt person is execution.”  The Justice Minister was allegedly a member of the Death Committee responsible for the 1988 massacre of tens of thousands of political prisoners in Iran.

Pour-Mohammadi expressed in an interview with the state news agency IRNA on September 30, that he doesn’t believe that the death penalty can be ruled out, saying, “There are cases in which someone is a source of corruption and his existence will bring about nothing but corruption.”

Reacting to the rising numbers of executions in Iran, Pour-Mohammadi pointed out, “the type of punishment in any situation should be proportionate to its effect. Scholars, jurists, experts, psychologists and criminologists should join hands to determine what kind of punishment will be the most effective.”

Sadeq Larijani, the Chief Justice of the Iranian regime, has stated  that it is not the Judiciary’s policy to eliminate executions for drug smugglers, “When did we have such an inclination? … This claim that executions were not useful is irrelevant. I urge all prosecutors across the country not to delay the implementation of the verdicts, and carry them out once they are issued. We are not allowed to delay carrying out the verdicts for three years and let the criminals begin praying in prison and then argue that since they pray we should cancel their executions. We cannot do away with executions in general because it undermines the judiciary’s deterrence.”

Executions are a means for establishing security in society, claimed the Chief Justice. He stressed, “One of the reasons for the effectiveness of these punishments is their prompt, expeditious and decisive implementation. It is against the interests of society and the Judiciary to prolong the prosecution process.” He criticized “giving opportunity during the prosecution” to those accused of drug smuggling and said, “The prosecutor offices must establish security on all levels and take this task seriously.”

 

Latest news

Renewed Protests Erupt in Iran

In recent days, Iran has witnessed fundamental changes in the nature of popular protests. The movement has evolved from...

Rising Crime and Social Breakdown After 47 Years of Clerical Rule in Iran

While Iran's regime has spent much of its resources and capabilities over more than four decades suppressing opponents, silencing...

Seventy-Eight Nobel Laureates Urge UN Action Amid Rising Executions in Iran

A coalition of 78 Nobel Prize laureates has issued a joint appeal to United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres, calling...

Bread Prices and the New Wave of Price Increases and Rationing in Iran

In recent days, the issue of bread prices has become one of the most important livelihood concerns in Iran....

Privatization: The Transfer of Wealth to Power Circles in Iran’s Regime

Privatization has been one of the most significant economic policies of Iran's regime over the past three decades. Regime...

European Union Sanctions Against Iran’s Regime and the Strait of Hormuz Crisis

In the latest development in the tense relations between Tehran and Brussels, the issue of European Union sanctions has...

Must read

Iran’s population exceeds 70 million – report

Iran Focus: Tehran, Iran, Nov. 23 – Iran’s population...

Iran university students call for boycott of elections

Iran Focus: Tehran, Jun. 03 – Skirmishes broke out...

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you