OpinionIran in the World PressMisreading Iran's election

Misreading Iran’s election

-

Washington Times – Editorial: Rarely has more misinformation been written or stated on one subject than is the case with Friday’s runoff election in Iran. Washington Times

Editorial

Rarely has more misinformation been written or stated on one subject than is the case with Friday’s runoff election in Iran. Throughout the past week, we have been treated to myriad analyses purporting to tell us important things about the two candidates in the runoff: Mahmud Ahmadinejad, variously described as the “hardline” or the “conservative” mayor of Tehran, who won the runoff election with nearly 62 percent of the vote over the “moderate” Ali Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, who served as president from 1989 to 1997, who won only about 37 percent.

Supposedly, we are told, Mr. Rafsanjani’s victory would have been a good thing, because he is a moderate and reformer who the European Union could reach an accommodation with over Iran’s nuclear program. Never mind the fact that, as president, he personally approved the murders of Iranian dissidents in Europe. Never mind all the corruption he employed in making himself a multimillionaire. Never mind the cavalier comment he made in December 2001 suggesting that Muslims would benefit from a nuclear-weapons exchange with Israel.

On the other hand, we were told, a victory for Mr. Ahmadinejab would usher in a generation of almost limitless darkness, as he and his fellow malevolent conservatives ushered Iran back to the Dark Ages. So, in mid-week, readers of newspapers like the New York Times were treated to a breathtaking revelation about Mr. Ahmadinejab: His wife and child use the Internet a great deal, and he therefore may not be determined to do what the mullahcrats in Tehran have been trying to do: censor the Internet or shut it down.

In truth, so much of this is rubbish and disinformation. The country’s supreme leader, the Ayatollah Khamenei, remains firmly in charge of the country — exactly as he would have been had Mr. Rafsanjani won the other day. The pop analysis aside, the election will have no effect on Iran’s weapons of mass destruction or its role in supporting terrorism.

Latest news

Execution of a Political Prisoner at Qezel Hesar Prison

Early this morning, Wednesday, Aref Khoshkar, a political prisoner and one of those arrested during the nationwide protests of...

U.S. Freezes $130 Million in Iranian Regime Digital Assets

The U.S. Department of the Treasury announced a new round of sanctions targeting the digital assets of the Iranian...

The War Between the United States and Iran’s Regime Enters More Complex Phase

As the military confrontation between the United States and the Iranian regime expands, new developments have emerged on the...

Iran’s Regime Issues Death and Prison Sentences in Cases Related to War Period and January Protests

Tehran Prosecutor Ali Salehi announced that all cases related to the 12-day war, the recent war with the United...

U.S. Defense Sec: Baghdad Must Disarm Militias Aligned with the Iranian Regime

U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth announced on Tuesday, July 14, that during his meeting with Iraqi Prime Minister...

Warning Over the Imminent Execution of Political Prisoner Aref Khoshkar in Iran

Following the transfer of political prisoner Aref Khoshkar, who has been sentenced to death, to a solitary confinement cell...

Must read

Containing Iran

Boston Globe: For two years, Iran and the International...

Iranian sisters face stoning for adultery: report

AFP: Two Iranian sisters convicted of adultery face being...

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you