—Three board members of the Iran Commerce Chamber have paid a 28-billion-rial down payment and 1.94-billion-rial rent of their personal homes from the chamber’s budget said the Tehran Commerce Chamber’s former chief.—Nineteen million dollars were missed amidst Airbus purchasing in 2019.—An Exporter refuses to return $180 million to the Central Bank.—State-backed mafia hoards the wheat, distributing flour full of lice among bakeries.
For over four decades, the mullahs of the Iranian regime have built up their state on corruption, embezzlement, bribery, and plundering policies. The people of Iran, however, are the foremost and sole victims of this dark era.
Citizens, who have lost their assets and property due to the regime’s misdeeds, have been chanting, “Financial criminals should be punished,” during their recent protests.
#IranProtests#Tehran, #Iran's capital—defrauded people by the Azvico automating company rally outside the special court of criminal crimes.
"Death to CEO Naghdi and his gang" and "Economic criminal must be punished," protesters chant. pic.twitter.com/amAtgTgAV2
The Iran Commerce Chamber Managers Line Their Pockets with National Capital
Three board members of the Iran Commerce Chamber have paid a 28-billion-rial down payment and 1.94-billion-rial rent of their personal homes from the chamber’s budget.
On May 30, Mohammad Reza Behzadian, the former chief of the Tehran Commerce Chamber, revealed the latest aspects of the systematic corruption in Iran. He said, “Three members of the Iran Commerce Chamber’s managing board have paid a down payment worth 28 billion rials [$112,000] at the expense of the chamber. They also paid 1.94 billion rials [$7,760] as home rents.”
He continued, “They have invented ‘other reasons’ titles to keep you in the dark. ‘What does mean others?’ we asked. At the same session, they said, ‘We do not know, and undoubtedly, there was a ruling for a necessary task. We gave it to a police officer to implement a rule.’ How much is this other, Mr. Policeman? A gift of 5 billion rials was paid in the meetings of the Tehran Commerce Chamber. Several members did abnormal acts during the chamber’s election. The Iran Commerce Chamber managed the election through fraudulent tricks. One person elected 40 members of the chamber. Afterward, Mr. Sharifi Nik-Nafs was identified as the culprit and fled.”
Behzadian added, “Members of the chamber’s managing board exploited 130 seats for their personal interests. Forty thousand members of representative delegations are presided by a boss… The chamber members refuse to deliver their financial receipts because they knew they were violating the law. Meanwhile, seven members of the managing board and representative members have a commander… The chamber also denied providing an estimation of sanctions harm to the private sector.”
“19-Million-Dollar Embezzlement,” State Media Titles
Nineteen million dollars missed amidst Airbus purchasing in 2019
The Iranian state media have revealed that around $19 million was missed during the purchase of three airbuses in 2019. Following the Iran 2015 nuclear deal, the international community created a corridor for Tehran to renew its aviation flotilla. However, this paved another path for the corrupt government in Iran to exploit this opportunity and line its pocket.
On June 8, the Jahan-e Sanat daily wrote, “In early 2019, three A-319 airbuses were added to the Homa aviation flotilla. In this context, a $44,366,251 deal was conducted between the Islamic Republic of Iran’s aviation office and the Tehran flight office. At the time, a three-member delegation comprised of aero industry experts estimated the planes’ prices at $3.15, $3.15, and $3.17 million.”
The daily added that they had, “recently obtained documents and evidence two years later, showing the delegation had totally estimated $5.8 million… Therefore, there is an $18,866,251 disadvantage. In 2019, one of the delegation’s members declared the airplane was worth $15 million. However, he estimated the same plane’s price as $5.8 million in 2020, which is irrational due to the growing inflation rate.”
An Exporter Refused to Return $180 Million
An Exporter refuses to return $180 million to the Central Bank
In a televised interview, Jamshid Nafar, the Iran Commerce Chamber’s former chief, revealed that “an exporter refused to return $180 million of his commitments.”
He said, “We gave his name to the Judiciary. Judicial officials summoned him from Mashhad, northeastern Iran, to explain his business. ‘I’ll come there, but you should pay my fair,’ he said to officials. Is it proper for him to say this? He had received 1.8 billion rials if he even paid 10 rials for each dollar, let alone the dollars were traded at 1,000, 2,000, or 3,000 rials.”
Notably, the dollar exchange against the rial has sharply increased since Ebrahim Raisi took office in August 2020. On June 13, state-run media reported that the rial had experienced another nosedive devaluation, with each U.S. dollar now trading at 333,000 rials.
Nafar questioned, “Didn’t the Central Bank of Iran (CBI) know? Didn’t our Ministry of Intelligence and Security (MOIS) know? Why did they not prevent [this embezzlement]?”, pointing to the systematic corruption that has engulfed the entire ruling system.
State-Backed Mafia Hoards Wheat
State-backed mafia hoards the wheat, distributing flour full of lice among bakeries.
In a video circulated on social media in October 2021, a baker shows lice in a handful of flour. He said, “It does not clear where did [officials] hide this. We received them yesterday. Look at the lice. Now, we have to sift it and bake bread for the people.”
از نگاه شما- توزیع آرد حاوی #شپش در #نانوایی ها. یکی از نانواهای خوزستان میگوید آردی که به دست آنها رسیده، با تاریخ تولید شهریور ۱۴۰۰، حاوی شپش است. ویدئو از کانال تلگرامی خوزتاب. pic.twitter.com/qSgUH1xnKJ
A citizen from Shiraz, who was a victim of the Iranian regime’s criminal policy, has spoken up about the regime’s policy of spreading addiction to drugs and other substances, and the extent to which this problem has affected Iranian society.
He began his remarks by stating, “The regime’s policy is to get all the youths addicted. This is something that now everyone knows, therefore many have decided to quit their addiction. I was addicted for nine years. Now I have quit it for four years and have been cleansed. Now I’m encouraging others to do the same thing.”
The man explained that he took this decision when he realized that the act of spreading addiction across the country is the regime’s plan to prevent the people from protesting. As a result, he, along with a group of like-minded individuals, have taken to conducting meetings every night to encourage others to seek help.
He said, “When they catch you with alcohol, you will face flogging, imprisonment, and fines. But if they catch you with drugs, there will be no punishment. Drugs have become very cheap. For about ten years, the price of opium has stayed the same, about five to six thousand rials (USD 0.15) per gram. Heroin has become very cheap and abundant. We have heard that the IRGC has taken over the control of the opium transit from Afghanistan to Turkey [through Iran].”
As heroin is cheaper than opium, a lot of people have resorted to taking heroin, even youths. Many young girls are also addicted to hashish and Marijuana.
He stated, “A new tragedy is that the government is giving out methadone pills. That is, government clinics provide on a quota or free basis. I asked the doctor what are the side effects of methadone? He said it is even worse than opium and other substances.”
He added, “Even in prison, methadone syrup was given to prisoners in large quantities. My friend who went to prison said 70 ccs of methadone syrup had to be given to the people forcibly. While two cc of methadone is equal to 10 grams of opium. They gave it for free. They deliberately gave it for free so that everyone could become addicted.”
Methadone can create life-threatening side effects. The man claimed that around 70% of young people in the city of Shiraz are now addicted to a substance.
For those wanting help to overcome their addictions, many fear entering the government’s addiction treatment centers due to reports of patients being beaten to create panic. Those who can afford to pay for treatment are faced with bills of around 1.9 million rials for public camps, and around 1.3 million rials for private ones.
In regard to the government boot camps, the man explained, “Anyone who goes to the government camp must sign an agreement that if he/she died, it is his/her responsibility, and the blood money is 5,000 rial,” he said.
That is, people’s lives are worthless. Now everyone goes to a private camp. Private camp officials have benevolent intentions and are all members of the N.A. Association. This association is active all over Iran and encourages young people to quit their addiction. No addict comes to the camp on his own. We force and encourage them. We realized that this phenomenon is a dirty conspiracy of the regime, therefore we are motivated to do so.
The man concluded his speech by saying, “The situation now is that young people, despite their addiction, are protesting and are active because now everyone understands that the country’s system is the cause of their addiction, and they are filled with resentment.”
Asghar Bagherzadeh, the regime’s deputy director of education and culture, has said that the number of students using drugs in Iran is worrying. He said the reason for this is that the students have easy access to drugs. Bagherzadeh has also stated that there are no exact statistics on the number of addicted students in the country.
Saeed Safatian, an addiction analyst with a history of policymaking in this area, in an interview on June 10, published by the state-run daily Rouydad 24 said that there are no separate statistics on the number of addicted children and adolescents in Iran, and in fact, these statistics are not very important for the relevant authorities. As a result, there is no planning in this field either.
He stated that the reason for the easy access to drugs is the organization and cohesion of drug trafficking networks and the easy promotion and sale of these drugs in cyberspace.
He believes that no school principals dare to run addiction prevention programs, therefore students turn to drugs in the context of learning from their peers. He believes that in Iran, in addition to curiosity, the feeling of hopelessness that is promoted by the regime also has a direct effect on drug use by this age group. He also announced that the number of female addicts has doubled since 2011.
It is worth mentioning that Mohsen Rezaei, the regime’s Vice President of Iran for Economic Affairs, had previously said that the problem of addiction, and its scope of distribution and trafficking, are all from within the country and the regime knows who is in charge, but no action has ever been taken.
— “Professional robbers stole more than 160 safe boxes” at a branch of the Bank Melli, authorities say.— The state-run TV says that the robbery took place on holiday while the holidays ended on Sunday, June 5—unless it had happened before, and the regime had concealed it.— The bank is located in one of the most crowded and secure zones — in front of Tehran University, 500m away from the Presidential Palace, at the street leading to the Supreme Leader’s Office and Judiciary Center, and 100m away from a State Security Forces (SSF) base.— There are too many unmarked intelligence and security bases to quell protests before reaching the offices of Khamenei and Raisi.
On Monday night, June 6, a group of thieves stole more than 160 safe boxes from the Bank Melli — the Tehran University branch. The Iranian state-run TV and Radio (IRIB) touted the robbery as a Hollywood movie scenario; however, observers believe the reality is completely different due to the evidence found.
The robbery has severely worried many people. On Wednesday, a group of citizens, who had lost the contents of their safe boxes in the robbery, flooded onto the street and rallied outside the bank. In response, the SSF fired shots into the air to disperse outraged protesters, rather than address their concerns. The protesters gathered chanted “Disgrace, disgrace,” venting their anger over the regime’s atrocities.
#BREAKING June 8—Tehran, #Iran Regime security forces attack protesting locals and college students. Sources say shots have been fired by the security forces. pic.twitter.com/y7RjSZ4HCG
Iranian authorities claimed that the robbery took place during holidays, despite the holidays ending a day earlier on June 5. This is unless the regime had concealed the theft and declared it late, which increased doubts. Four days after the robbery, the SSF proclaimed that its ‘skilled detectives’ had succeeded in detaining the thieves.
On June 11, SSF chief in Tehran Hossein Rahimi, highlighting the ‘elite operation’ of his forces, said, “Our forces did not rest for a week.” Rahimi’s remarks later raised a wave of criticism and sarcastic comments. Netizens mocked Tehran’s SSF chief, saying, “How did his forces ‘not rest’ for a week when the robbery took place just five days ago. Does the SSF know more about the event but are hiding it?”
Several people have addressed fugitive officials, such as Mahmoud Reza Khavari, the former chairman of the Bank Melli and Bank Sepah, who is affiliated with the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), stating, “Nice job, but why has the SSF failed to find the thieves of oil rigs,” referring to state-backed officials’ plunder and embezzlement in petroleum facilities. Khavari notably fled the country to Canada with a $2.6-million embezzlement case back in 2011.
Noting Rahimi’s use of the term “the holidays”, it appears that he explicitly admitted that the robbery did not occur in a single day, and instead lasted several days. Due to the intensive security measures in this zone, this is a debacle for the SSF if Rahimi was right and has told the truth.
The bank that was targeted is located at Enghelab [Revolution] Street, in front of the well-known Tehran University— in one of the capital’s most crowded districts. The bank is also only 500 meters away from the Presidential Palace, with the Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei’s office and Judiciary Center located a little further away. In the area, there are many secret security bases nipping potential protests in the bud before reaching the offices of Khamenei and President Ebrahim Raisi.
Bank Melli—Tehran University branch—located in a security zone, near sensitive government offices
The event greatly shocked state-run media. The Shargh daily cited Iran Daily’s correspondent at the cabinet Morteza Golpoor’s tweet on June 8, which stated, “[Robbers] emptied 1,000 safe boxes in one of Tehran’s most security streets while there is a police station 200 meters farther, and the offices of president and judiciary are located 500 meters farther.”
According to the police, the thieves used professional, heavy equipment to open the safe boxes. They had primarily disrupted security cameras and garnered and taken all servers with them after the robbery. The authorities are avoiding providing actual facts of the case, further prompting public suspicions.
The Asr Iran website quoted “reformist” Abbas Abdi on June 8, saying, “Bank Melli robbery did not carry out by ordinary thieves… It has targeted security rather than stealing some cash and gold. Consider it as an act of terror, not a robbery.”
‘Officials Designed and Plundered Safe Boxes,’ Citizens Say
Authorities have also refused to declare the real number of the plundered safe boxes. Primarily, Iran’s state media reported that the thieves stole more than 160 boxes, while several experts have claimed that the number of plundered boxes was around 170. However, in Khabar Online’s June 10 report, they mentioned about 250 to 400 safe boxes.
Many citizens believe that the robbery was a government scheme. They point to the recent law added to the Islamic Republic Penal Code, saying, “Transportation and storage of more than €10,000 is an example of currency smuggling.” The law was put into effect on April 30, and violators will be punished for 15 to 20 years in prison, and the death penalty in some cases.
In his interview, Rahimi declared that the SSF had delivered the stolen properties to the Central Bank of Iran (CBI), and those people whose savings have been plundered can refer to the CBI to take their belongings. Notably, the Bank Melli had already refused compensation for the lost properties, saying that they did not know what the people had held in their safe boxes!
Observers have said, “In such circumstances, dare someone claim that they have lost more than €10,000, which is equivalent to life imprisonment or death sentence? Indeed, the regime applied this scenario to ‘legally’ plunder people’s property.”
This is another view of the mullahs’ 43 years of corruption and plunders under the banner of religious decrees. Such plundering, of course, expands the gap between society and the state, shrinks the regime’s social base, and fuels public outrage and hatred against the entire ruling system, which relies on robbery, embezzlement, and crimes to ensure its survival.
During a lecture in February 2018, the regime’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei described that “The corruption looks like a seven-headed dragon. Every time you cut one head; it still comes to you with another head.” Today, the people of Iran have grasped that the Supreme Leader and his office, which controls a $200-billion-worth business, is the heart of this dragon. “The people beg, [Khamenei] lives like God,” citizens from all different walks of life chant today, venting their anger over the entire regime.
On June 2, during a large-scale operation by the People’s Mojahedin Organization of Iran (PMOI/MEK) supporters in Iran, the surveillance cameras of the regime’s Ministry of Intelligence and the Tehran Municipality were disabled.
This heavy blow to the regime made one of the major headlines in Iran, with the Iranian regime’s state media reflecting this news and the crises it caused for the regime.
The regime refused to give any official position on the incident, while some of its media wrote about it in a hysterical way, with each fabricated claim being just as bizarre as the next.
From the regime’s point of view, in terms of technology and complexity, what happened was one of the most unique blows to its surveillance and repression system. A blow that is encouraging the people and will show them new opportunities to fight the regime.
Shifting the blame on its foreign adversaries is a well-known and old policy of propaganda used by the regime to cover up its weaknesses when confronting the MEK’s Resistance Units.
Another problem for the regime is that such operations, with these dimensions and effects, introduce an alternative that creates a new balance of power in the Iranian political scene. That is, its socio-political effect is far more than its technical effect.
In regards to the dimension of this operation, the state-run daily Etemad Online wrote in their June 12 publication, “One week after the cyber-attack on Tehran’s municipal systems, the scale of the attack has not yet been determined, nor have the systems been made available, nor have any of the various institutions involved in cybersecurity commented on it. No news has been published by the Tehran Municipality so far, and only the head of the Tehran City Council has called the perpetrators of this attack enemies.”
They added, “An hour after this incident, the public relations of the Tehran Municipality Information Technology Organization issued a statement confirming the ‘intentional disruption in the internal page of the Tehran Municipality’s intranet system’ and announced: ‘The process of eliminating this limited disruption was completed quickly’. However, none of the systems and sites related to Tehran Municipality have been made available yet, and no time has been announced for a return to normal conditions.”
On June 8, the state-run daily Nameh News reflected the regime’s desperation and wrote, “Hack after hack and disruption after disruption! One day prison camera, one day gas stations, one day radio and television, one day municipal systems from city signs to metro ticket chargers; Even the speaker of some passage in Mashhad is hacked and it is interesting that no one is worried about all this hacking.”
The state-run Jahan-e Sanat daily reflected the regime’s technical weakness in their publication, writing, “The question is where are the passive security and defense apparatuses and other responsible institutions in this field? When the shouts of the people are heard standing in line at subway stations for several hours, the chairman of Tehran City Council says very simply and easily that ‘hacking municipal systems were Mossad’s job’.”
According to this outlet, “Mehdi Chamran, chairman of Tehran City Council, while expressing ‘that the hacking of the municipal systems was done by the MEK and all anti-Islamic currents, they had planned it in advance to show the Tehran municipality’s weakness, but they failed and could not realize it.’ However, the reality is that the upward trend and the increase in such disorders are more than that, they could be simply ignored.”
The state-run Reporters Club News Agency wrote, “A cybersecurity expert believes that these hacks are becoming more newsworthy and more observable than ever because of their importance. According to Fallahi, hacking is not a one-night or an immediate decision. Any cyber-attack means that the hacker has infiltrated the system for years and now declares its destruction for any reason.”
Launched in 2002, June 12 marks the World Day Against Child Labour. Under Article 32 of the Universal Declaration of Child Rights, it states that children must be protected from any work that threatens their growth and health, and that governments must specify the minimum working age and working conditions for children. The day of observation was created to raise awareness and activism to prevent children from across the world from being forced into child labor.
The question is how is the situation of child labor among the street children in Iran?
Many times, the Iranian regime’s officials in the welfare departments of the provinces, and the managers of the municipal departments of different cities have identified thousands of children working in the country.
However, due to the negligence of the responsible organizations and the existence of a state-controlled mafia abusing the children, accurate statistics on the number of working and street children are not provided by the relevant authorities. Often, in different comments by some regime officials, the number of working children is estimated to be in the millions.
The problem of child labor is like an iceberg, meaning that we can only see what is visible – the children working on the street – but a large majority of the children are working out of sight in workshops and other places.
In a previous comment, the Director-General of Welfare in Tehran Province said that in Tehran metros alone, more than 2000 children are working. Unofficial statistics have stated that more than 20,000 children are working on the streets of Tehran, and from that number more than 4,000 of them are working as waste collectors.
One of the factors that have been considered as the reason for the high number of child laborers in Iran is the high number of parents who are unemployed or struggling with social crises. As a result, they are forced to send their children to the streets to find work. The latest estimation by the regime suggests that more than seven million children are forced to work in this way.
75% of working children are in the age group of 10 to 14 years old, with the average age being 13 years old. Around 5% of children are under 7 years old, while the gender composition of working children shows that about 15% of these children are girls and 85% are boys.
According to the regime’s experts, around 30% of these children do not know if they had a birth certificate. Fifty percent of these children started working between the ages of 7 and 10, and 20 percent work started under the age of seven.
Of the children in Iran forced into child labor, 35% of these children are in good health, with the other 65% being in poor conditions. 40% of these children are completely illiterate, 75% of the rest have at least a sixth-grade education, and only 3% have had a high school education.
Eighty percent of boys and 60 percent of girls work in the public and semi-public sectors, with the rest of the boys working in shops, mechanics, repair shops, markets, warehouses, agriculture, and recycling factories. The rest of the girls work in houses, workshops, shops and agricultural land, and greenhouses. The number of girls working in the waste recycling workshop is also much higher than boys, which makes them more vulnerable.
With the regime’s medieval culture strongly encouraging girls’ workers into prostitution, we now see that the average age of these girls has reached below 15. These young girls are routinely sexually abused and exploited.
The results of the regime’s recent welfare surveys have shown that of those children working on the streets, 33.8% of these children work between one and four hours, 52.1% work between four and eight hours and 13% of them spend more than eight hours on the street.
Surveys have also shown that around 73% of street children have a history of violence, both physical and non-physical acts such as humiliation, bullying, etc.
These days, it is not just a matter of illiteracy, school dropouts, or malnutrition affecting these children. HIV, addiction, depression, self-harm, suicide, sexual harassment, uncontrolled violence, etc. are all emerging amongst the population of working children.
An important point, which is less related to the physical problems and physical abilities to work with children and more related to their psychological and social issues, is that these children do not have a childhood at all, and this can have very profound lifelong consequences.
These children cannot play and interact with their peers and are not exposed to the joys and excitements of childhood. Instead, they are exposed to stresses and pressures in the workplace that are not appropriate for their age, and their brain, soul, and psyche are not ready to deal with it. This unfortunately makes them more prone to many psychological and social disorders that will stay with them throughout their adult lives.
Children in Iran are victims of the regime’s destructive policies. Many families cannot send their children to school simply because they cannot afford the necessary supplies. These destructive policies are summed up in institutionalized corruption, wasting national wealth on nuclear and missile programs, terrorism, and oppression, which has led t the freefall of the country’s economy.
Last week, a spokesman of the Iranian regime’s judiciary announced in a press conference that Bijan Zanganeh, the former oil minister for the regime’s seventh, eighth, eleventh, and twelfth administrations, was present in the criminal court in regards to the Crescent case.
Regarding the inquiry of Zanganeh’s accusations, Massoud Satayeshi said, “The expert discussion has been completed in full and the next meetings will be held in the coming days and the results will be announced.”
The Crescent case is a highly prolonged and complicated dispute in the regime due to the scale of mass corruption surrounding it. So much so that even the regime themselves could not condone the crimes implemented in this case.
This dispute is concerning a gas contract between the National Iranian Oil Company (NIOC) and Crescent Petroleum. Initial negotiations began in 1997 and led to an ambiguous joint agreement in 2001. They agreed that the regime will transport Iran’s gas from the Salman oil and gas field, part of which it shares with the UAE, to the Crescent company for 25 years. At the time, Crescent negotiated a fixed purchase price of 18 USD per barrel for the first seven years, which would increase to 40 USD for the subsequent 18 years.
Over the past few years, many of the regime’s media outlets have spoken about a large amount of bribery in this case, and have stated that the Iranian people are enduring losses to the extremely low price of the sold gas.
The entire contract is worth about $ 18 billion, which shows why many of the regime’s officials involved in the procedure of this contract are suspected to be involved in the corruption. Zanganeh and members of the board of directors of the National Iranian Oil Company, with the consent of the Emirati company, had decided to keep the provisions of the Crescent gas contract secret.
Due to the shame of the scandal, this dispute has caused, the regime has canceled its side of the contract. During the negotiations with Crescent Oil Company of the United Arab Emirates, the regime’s then-oil officials were supposed to export Iranian gas to the country at a bargain price from the Salman oil field and pocket the difference between the main gas price and the price stated in the contract. The full extent of this great corruption is unknown, but the people involved made, or were trying to make, profits of tens or even hundreds of millions of dollars.
At the time, Hassan Rouhani was the secretary of the regime’s Supreme National Security Council. In a critical letter to Khatami’s oil minister Bijan Zanganeh, he described the ‘price and contract terms’ at Crescent as ‘very unfavorable’ compared to other contracts in the region.
Rouhani went on to describe the Crescent contract in three ways: ‘First, the lack of a valid guarantee in the contract, second, the invalidity of the Crescent company, and third, inappropriate price and contract conditions.’
Crescent was first mentioned in public and in the media in the mid-2000s. This name has been associated with the name of Iran’s ‘oil general’ Bijan Zanganeh, for many years. Iranian state news agencies have said that one of the ‘intermediaries in concluding this contract, who did not reach his brokerage right’, had provided the information of this contract to the officials of the Court of Audit at the time, and finally disclosed this disaster.
Mohammad Reza Rahimi, the former head of the Court of Audit, who is said to be in prison, was the person who ordered the suspension of the Crescent contract in 2005. In his interviews, he took a hard line against Zanganeh, calling the signing of the agreement a ‘betrayal of Iran’.
This termination order is what eventually led the Emirati Crescent Company to sue the regime in 2009 in The Hague. The company, with its professional lawyers, was able to oust the Iranian regime and, after several years of litigation, it was able to fine the regime for the first part of the contract, which included seven years of gas exports, and amounted to $607 million dollars.
Bijan Zanganeh, and other officials of the regime’s Ministry of Oil, made extensive efforts in the 2000s in order to conceal or clear the traces of their corruption. Their work led to bribery, deception, threats, and even the physical removal of those aware of the contract. However, despite their efforts, none of these actions assisted them in covering their tracks.
In 2013, immediately after the Crescent contract hearing, the security forces of the regime abducted Abbas Yazdan Panah Yazdi, an Iranian-British oil broker living in Dubai, and transferred him to Iran where they reportedly killed him.
Yazdan Panah Yazdi had testified against the regime in The Hague and had angered the officials of the regime. The trial ended, to the detriment of the regime whose officials are mired in corruption, and it is predicted that the regime will most likely lose the next trial which is scheduled to be held in Paris in September 2022.
The latest trial is said to be focused on the second part of the contract. In this part of the contract, the regime was obliged to export its gas to the United Arab Emirates for 17 years. Experts have predicted that a fine of 10 billion dollars, will be waiting for the regime following the trial’s conclusion.
It may not be important for the ruling regime in Iran, which ranks 140th in Transparency International’s Corruption Perceptions Index, to pay huge damages to the UAE, but for the people of Iran, who are now starving and struggling to survive, this is a huge amount of the country’s wealth from their pockets.
Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei painted most of his regime’s current crises with the same broad brush on Saturday when he delivered a wide-ranging speech to mark the anniversary of the death of his predecessor, Ruhollah Khomeini. Khamenei sought to portray the Islamic Republic as the victim of a global conspiracy, with events both inside the country and throughout the world being directed by the regime’s “enemies”.
“Today, the enemies’ most important hope for striking a blow at the country is based on popular protests,” the regime’s supreme leader said. The Islamic Republic has been mired in protests throughout the month of May, beginning with teacher protests that were organized to coincide with International Worker’s Day, and continuing through protests over food subsidy cuts and the collapse of a building in the city of Abadan, which activists have blamed on government corruption.
Many of those activists have indeed promoted the idea of regime change as a solution to such problems, and Khamenei appears to have seized upon that message to argue that the public demonstrations are really the work of foreign “infiltrators”. However, slogans like “death to the dictator” and “we do not want the mullahs ruling” have defined several large-scale protests in the Islamic Republic in recent years, including at least eight movements since the beginning of 2018 which the leading opposition group, the People’s Mojahedin Organization of Iran, labeled as nationwide uprisings.
While some of these protests have received public statements of support from the likes of the White House, those statements have been fairly tepid and have avoided any explicit endorsement of regime change. There has certainly been no evidence presented by Tehran or any other entity to suggest meaningful foreign investment into the protests, much less a foreign point of origin. Yet Khamenei and others continue to rely on intimations of foreign conspiracy as part of an effort to delegitimize local organizing efforts, which the PMOI largely attributes to its own “Resistance Units”.
Khamenei’s condemnation of “enemy” plots may also serve as a public justification for acts of foreign confrontation and brinksmanship which the regime’s critics have long described as a pillar of its strategy of keeping a hold on power. This interpretation was given additional credence by the fact that the supreme leader’s speech also featured unusually forthright statements about one of the most recent outlets for his regime’s conflict with foreign adversaries.
Khamenei openly acknowledged that the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps boarded two Greek oil tankers in the Persian Gulf last month for the purpose of “taking back” oil that had been “stolen” from Iran via the enforcement of US sanctions. The statement was at odds with earlier statements from lesser Iranian authorities, which justified the seizures by vaguely accusing the tanker crews of violating some unspecified maritime rules.
These earlier statements were more in line with Tehran’s commentary on similar tit-for-tat seizures in the past, as well as other provocative acts such as the close approach of US warships transiting the Strait of Hormuz. In other cases, Tehran has simply denied responsibility for incidents in surrounding waters, such as the 2019 limpet mine attacks on several tankers and the 2021 attack on a tanker with ties to Israel, which killed two English crew members.
According to the state-run Mashregh website, an informed official in the Iranian regime’s Organization of Targeted Subsidies has announced that the payment of subsistence subsidies to 72 million people ended on June 6.
According to statistics, Iran has a population of 85 million. A simple calculation shows that around 84.7% of the Iranian population requires financial help in the form of subsidies. It is surprising that these strange figures can be found in a country that is one of the richest countries in the world and is known for having many natural resources, including energy reserves and their by-products.
The reality of the situation is that since the inception of the Velayat-e-Faqih regime, Iran is traversing the path of death rows, despair, inflation, unemployment, terrorism, nuclear threats, torture, executions, and injustice. This dire situation has clearly resulted from the regime founder Ruhollah Khomeini’s promises in the series of speeches before and after the referendum on the establishment of the Islamic Republic in February 1979.
Free utilities, housing for the poor, full rights for religious and ethnic minorities, and reduced military spending were some of the promises Khomeini made in his speeches. However, more than four decades later, not only have none of these promises been fulfilled, but in many cases, the Velayat-e-Faqih regime has acted in a way that is completely opposite of those promises.
The mullahs ruling in Iran are interfering heavily in the internal affairs of the countries in the region. The formation and financial and military support of many proxy groups, who have nothing else to do but kill and loot, illustrate this fact.
In recent years, Khamenei still had foreign exchange reserves to pay these militant groups, such as the Lebanese Hezbollah and the Yemeni Houthis, but these reserves seem to have run out, and selling cheap oil to countries like China does not provide enough capital to continue funding them.
Like in previous governments, the cabinet of the regime’s current president Ebrahim Raisi has increased taxes and tariff-imposed subscription fees on many public services, introduced building permits, eliminated imports of essential materials at government rates, and increased commodity prices to make up for his government’s budget deficit.
This has subsequently led to a sharp rise in the price of bread and other essential items for the Iranian people. The corrupt circles of the government, headed by the regime’s supreme leader Ali Khamenei, along with the ministers and other incompetent officials, and the unprecedented increase of oppression and social injustice, have tested the patience of the Iranian people, who are rightly outraged with the current situation.
The recent series of anti-government protests across the country is exactly what Khamenei fears the most. In a speech on January 25, 2016, he said that if we do not keep the war outside our borders, we must fight the enemy here in Kermanshah and Hamedan, and other provinces. The domestic enemy he made reference to back then was clearly the people in revolt against the regime, threatening their existence.
This backward regime, based on medieval religious laws, cannot meet the economic, cultural, and political demands of the Iranian people, so their only solution is to rule them brutally.
The reason why this regime has never been at peace in the last 40 years is that war and crisis have been a cover for internal inhuman repression. The current situation of the government is so critical that Haddad Adel, the former speaker of parliament and the father-in-law of Mojtaba Khamenei, said on April 22, 2012, “Everything is in disarray.”
Qassem Saedi, a member of the Iranian parliament, warned that “there are likely to be more dangerous events than the uprisings of 2017 and mid-November 2019.”
These protests and demonstrations are no longer about the bad economic situation. They have turned into political protests. The slogans of ‘Death to Khamenei’, ‘Raisi, mullahs must get lost’, ‘Death to the dictator’, ‘Disgrace to our radio and television’, ‘Khamenei is a murderer, and his government is vain’, to name but a few, have now become common chants at protests up and down the country. This is exactly what has sounded the alarm for Khamenei.
The mullahs, as always and as expected, see the people and their Resistance movement as their potential enemies, and as a result, have used all their military and repressive power to suppress the recent waves of protests, and have dramatically increased the number of executions taking place in prisons across Iran.
After over 40 years of destruction of the country, the Iranian regime has further accelerated this destruction during the tenure of its current president Ebrahim Raisi. The regime no longer has the right to speak about development and progress while the levels of destruction have reached the people’s basic necessities, from bread and water to clean air.
The country is currently imperiled by the threat of famine. Forty years of back-breaking two-digit inflation, the loss of capital and financial resources, national savings, and oil revenues, are collectively vaporizing the different classes in Iranian society. It is beyond imagination to assess the impact the destruction has had on medical treatment, health services, people’s health, and longevity.
This is something that Ruhollah Khomeini, as the founder of this regime, left for the people of Iran and now his successors are continuing his dark heritage.
The latest atrocity is the collapsed Metropol building in Abadan which caused the deaths of many deprived people. The regime has done nothing to help the victims of the disaster and has outright refused to extract their bodies buried under the rubble of the building.
The regime is also adding insult to injury with the presentation of a song named ‘Hail to the commander,’ praising the regime’s supreme leader Ali Khamenei.
The state-run Jahan-e Sanat daily blamed the regime as the main culprit. It wrote, “The government, which is the main factor in designing inflationary budgets and fiat money and growing liquidity, appears every day as a public prosecutor, accusing the private sector, guilds, and producers, and sometimes with harsh behavior, it is misrepresenting the cause of rising inflation.”
Many of the regime’s experts and economists have come to believe that using the word ‘crisis’ to describe the current situation is no longer effective. All the while, the regime is putting the blame on an imaginary enemy for this crisis and catastrophe.
The Jahan-e Sanat added, “Everyone is shocked at what has happened to Iran’s economy. How is it possible for a country with such resources and capacities to have such a miserable economy?”
Even with a collapsed economy, the regime is fiercely insisting on printing fiat money, which will further affect the children and elderly in the country by starving them and driving them further into poverty.
After tripling the price of fuel and murdering 1,500 protesters during the November 2019 uprisings, the regime has now decided to increase the price of bread, cheese, and egg, deceptively referring to it as ‘economic reforms’.
The Jahan-e Sanat further stated, “For forty years, governments in Iran have come to the fore one after the other, but they have not been able to solve the problem of double-digit inflation. Rising prices for commodities such as flour, poultry, and dairy products are passive reactions and cannot be called economic reforms.”
The waste of the country’s resources is another factor in this devastation. Mehrdad Bazrpash, the head of the regime’s court of audit, highlighted, “Investigations by the Court of Audit show that a significant portion of the country’s resources is being wasted.”
To waste the country’s resources simply means to starve millions. Now the regime is planning to steal the people’s last assets and savings in the worst possible way, but claiming that they are reforming the economy.
This, of course, is just an excuse to further reduce the value of subsidies in the face of the rapidly rising cost of goods and commodities needed by the people.
Hojjat Mirzaei, the former deputy minister of social welfare, believes that the recent liberalization of prices is an extreme measure that shows the confusion and a kind of disintegration within the government’s decisions.
The state-run website Rooz-e No quoted MIrzaei as saying, “Countries that put structural adjustment on the agenda were very cautious and slow about eliminating food and medicine subsidies. But the 13th government has implemented the most extreme part of the adjustment in the most extreme way possible. Personally, I do not know of any economist who, in the current state of society, would consider the abolition of bread and medicine subsidies to be a correct step. In other words, they carried out an extremist policy in the most radical way.”
What is more painful is that the reduction of water, bread, and medicine is being done in the name of increasing subsidies, to compensate for the millions of rials for the increase in the price of essential goods and services.
The International Atomic Energy Agency’s (IAEA) new report on Iran’s nuclear activities has created a major challenge for the Iranian regime, with many of its media outlets and officials expressing their fear and concern over the consequences of this report. The Agency had expected that Iran would respond to its questions about the hidden and suspect projects, especially the presence of uranium particles in four previously undeclared sites
However, it appears that the regime has either failed to respond to the questions, or its answers were not satisfying. The regime’s stonewalling has prompted the EU three and the U.S. to draft a resolution to be tabled at the IAES BoG’s meeting that begins on June 6.
And because only a majority is needed to adopt the resolution, Tehran’s traditional allies, Russia, and China cannot veto the measure. Some of the regime’s experts have said that this time, a new resolution will not have any impact on the Iranian economy, because it’s risk factor has reached seven.
In its latest Global Risks Report, the World Economic Forum added the following items in its assessment of risk factors: 1: Employment and livelihood crises
2: Widespread youth disillusionment
3: Prolonged economic stagnation
4: Natural resource crises
5: Biodiversity loss and ecosystem collapse
These latest additions show that Iran’s economy has been facing a downfall for a long while.
The draft resolution has created a nightmare for the regime as it calls on the clerical regime to cooperate fully with the IAEA and respond to their questions immediately.
In recent months, the Vienna talks to revive the JCPOA nuclear deal came to a standstill with the announcement by US President Joe Biden that the Revolutionary Guards (IRGC) will be kept on the US’s Foreign Terrorist Organizations (FTO) list.
Before this announcement, news about a new nuclear deal had been broadcast by the regime’s media, which along with the pro-appeasement policy had promised that an agreement would be signed within a few weeks, a few days, or even a few hours. It was later revealed that there were many disputes between the negotiating parties that could not be resolved so easily.
Iran’s regime has unilaterally demanded the lifting of all sanctions and the need for it to verify that they have indeed been lifted. Tehran also demanded a guarantee for the return of oil proceeds and that no US future administrations would ever leave the JCPOA.
The US rejected in a previous commentary in the Kayhan daily, the mouthpiece of the regime’s supreme leader Ali Khamenei, and its chief editor Hossein Shariatmadari, acknowledged the stalemate in the Vienna talks, making it clear that the regime knows that sanctions will not be lifted without making certain concessions.
Following a long period of useless negotiations, the IAEA is now sounding the alarms. This is because the regime has not given a credible and technical response to the Agency’s specific questions about radioactive material of human origin being found on some of its suspect sites.
This is not the Agency’s only concern. At present, the amount of the regime’s uranium stockpile has reached 18 times more than allowed in the JCPOA.
On June 1, the Institute for Science and International Security (ISIS) wrote, “Iran has crossed a new, dangerous threshold; Iran’s breakout timeline is now at zero. It has enough 60 percent enriched uranium or highly enriched uranium (HEU) to be assured it could fashion a nuclear explosive. If Iran wanted to further enrich its 60 percent HEU up to weapons-grade HEU, or 90 percent, it could do so within a few weeks with only a few of its advanced centrifuge cascades.”
It added, “In parallel, within a month, it could produce enough weapons-grade uranium for a second nuclear explosive from its existing stock of near 20 percent low enriched uranium. Whether or not Iran enriches its HEU up to 90 percent, it can have enough HEU for two nuclear weapons within one month after starting the breakout.”
ISIS further explained, “Within 1.5 months after starting breakout, it could accumulate enough for a third nuclear weapon, using its remaining near 20 percent enriched uranium and some of its 4.5 percent enriched uranium. In 2.75 months after starting breakout, it could have a fourth quantity by further enriching 4.5 percent enriched uranium up to 90 percent. At six months, it could have produced the fifth quantity by further enriching both 4.5 percent enriched uranium and natural uranium. The accumulation for a sixth would take several months longer.”
It can be said that the regime has faced three consecutive defeats in a short period:
The announcement that it’s the Revolutionary Guards (IRGC) will remain on the US FTO list.
