Iran Nuclear NewsUN nuclear chief to report on whether to continue...

UN nuclear chief to report on whether to continue atomic aid to Iran

-

AFP: IAEA chief Mohamed ElBaradei is to report on whether the UN atomic agency should cut down on aid to Iran as part of UN sanctions on Tehran’s nuclear program, according to a document obtained by AFP. VIENNA, Jan 5, 2007 (AFP) – IAEA chief Mohamed ElBaradei is to report on whether the UN atomic agency should cut down on aid to Iran as part of UN sanctions on Tehran’s nuclear program, according to a document obtained by AFP.

The report could lead to an emergency meeting later this month or in early February of the International Atomic Energy Agency’s 35-nation board of governors at IAEA headquarters in Vienna, diplomats said Friday.

The board had in November shelved a project that would have given safety expertise for a heavy-water reactor Iran is building and which will produce plutonium, which like enriched uranium is nuclear reactor fuel but also a prime explosive material for atom bombs.

The United Nations Security Council adopted a resolution on December 23 that imposed sanctions on Iran if it did not to halt sensitive nuclear fuel work that has raised fears Tehran seeks atomic weapons.

Resolution 1737 also called for an examination of IAEA aid to Iran, which is meant to be peaceful and comprises some 20 projects including work on radiopharmaceutical kits, radiation treatment for cancer, and development of a nuclear waste disposal center.

Some countries, including several European states, are urging caution, saying it would be better to wait until a regularly scheduled IAEA board meeting in March to rule on the aid.

A senior European diplomat said the mood now among key board members including the United States was apparently to wait, especially if ElBaradei files his report on technical cooperation in February, only weeks before this board March 5.

“We’re not looking to end up in a situation where we have a divisive board,” the diplomat said, reporting to a split between developing countries, which are reluctant for any aid projects to be cut, and the United States and Europe, which want to crack down on Iran.

“I don’t anticipate this being a difficult period. The difficult period will be in March when we have not seen any reaction from Iran in terms of suspension,” of nuclear fuel work, the diplomat said.

ElBaradei is to file another report for the March board, this one on Iran’s compliance with the Security Council’s call for Tehran to halt the fuel work.

Iran continues to defy the UN demand, with Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad on Wednesday saying his country would soon “push the button” on production
of nuclear fuel for industrial uses.
The Security Council resolution said states should “take the necessary measures to prevent the provision to Iran of any technical assistance or training”
which might help Tehran make nuclear reactor fuel or develop “nuclear weapon delivery systems.”

ElBaradei than sent a letter December 27 to the Slovenian chairman of the IAEA board to say his secretariat “will evaluate all IAEA technical cooperation
projects for Iran in light of resolution 1737,” according to the copy of the letter obtained by AFP.

Western nations had already in November challenged the IAEA’s aid programs to Iran.

British diplomat Carol Cliff, writing to the IAEA secretariat on behalf of her country as well as Australia, Canada, France and the United States, asked to what extent the IAEA was taking into account “sensitive activities” in Iran, according to a copy of the letter obtained by AFP.

Questions asked by Cliff included: “Have any experts or scientists trained by the IAEA moved to jobs at Natanz or Isfahan,” referring to Iran’s two key facilities involved in enriching uranium.

A diplomat close to the IAEA said “none of the projects enhance Iran’s nuclear capability so the move to cut technical cooperation is just a symbolic kick in the head.”

The UN resolution says “technical cooperation provided to Iran by the IAEA … shall only be for food, agricultural, medical, safety or other humanitarian purposes.”

Another diplomat said that evaluating what is humanitarian aid is “quite complicated” and that it was ElBaradei himself who had been pushing for a board meeting in order to have a political ruling on his mandate for the aid projects.

Latest news

The Role of Students and Universities in Iran’s Nationwide Uprising

In the national uprising of the people of Iran, which started in mid-September this year, the students played a...

Snapback Sanctions, a Must Response to Iran’s Human Rights Abuse and JCPOA Violations

The protests in Iran have been going on for more than two months, even though the regime is cracking...

Growing Disintegration Among Iran Regime’s Forces

Iran has been shaken by a wave of nationwide protests since mid-September. The trigger was the death of the...

Grim Tidings for Iran’s Regime After Approval of UN Fact-Finding Mission

After many discussions and debates, the United Nations Human Rights Council has approved a fact-finding mission to investigate the...

Iranian People’s Resistance Changed the Appeasement Policy

Soon after the new US government started its obligations in January 2021, hand in hand with the European governments...

Khamenei’s Disgraceful Campaign Against Piranshahr and Javanrud, Who Will Be the Loser?

On the 67th day of Iran’s revolution, the Iranian regime attempted to put a halt to the protests in...

Must read

Iran switches reserves to gold – report

Reuters: Iran has converted financial reserves into gold to...

Mandela’s legacy lives on in Iranian Resistance

Townhall.com: By honoring those in the Iranian resistance – whose...

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you