Thousands of Unemployed Nurses Show Little Interest in Job Postings

Mohammad Sharifi Moghadam, the Secretary-General of Iran’s Nurses’ Home, stated that “thousands of nurses are unemployed” and despite the large number of unemployed nursing graduates, there is very little interest in official job advertisements in major cities. He said no candidates have yet come forward for the recruitment of 10,000 to 12,000 nurses. On Friday, August 2, Sharifi Moghadam told the state-run ILNA news agency that the “uncontrolled expansion of nursing school capacities” in Iran does not help resolve the employment crisis among nurses. He reported that many nurses have migrated abroad and added, “Many have chosen to stay home rather than work as nurses, and some have turned to other jobs.” In recent years, nurses in various cities have repeatedly held protest gatherings over their professional and livelihood issues, but their demands have yet to be fully addressed.
Nurse Shortage Leads to Closure of Hospital Departments in Iran
ILNA reported that the July salaries of many nurses across different cities were significantly reduced—by as much as 80 to 100 million rials (approximately $90 to $112) in some cases—once again sparking their outcry. It is worth noting that the base salary in Iran is around 150 million rials (approximately $167). The news agency also emphasized that nurses had previously protested against the coercive treatment by Iranian regime officials. According to the report, nurses who have protested against low wages, harsh working conditions, and being forced to work overtime have faced punitive actions such as dismissal, forced relocation, or suspension from service. The Secretary-General of the Nurses’ Home also commented on the dire conditions, stating: “Low salaries and inadequate and irregular payments pose a serious threat to retaining this vital workforce in the country. We are genuinely facing a shortage of nurses, and this shortage has become evident during various national crises.”

Why Are Nurses Not Responding to Recruitment Calls?

After five years, the Ministry of Health announced a recruitment call for 10,000 to 12,000 nurses, but the positions remain unfilled. This is despite the fact that there are currently around 80,000 nursing graduates in the country. However, even these graduates are not responding to the official hiring announcements.
Iran: Some Nurses Are Homeless and Sleep in Their Cars
The Secretary-General of the Nurses’ Home said that the lack of response from nurses to the latest recruitment call is due to “a decline in motivation to enter the profession and its structural issues.” Sharifi Moghadam added: “Unfortunately, certain management behaviors at the ministry, hospital, and university levels have forced nurses to quit their jobs, migrate, or change professions. Working and living conditions must be improved in order to retain skilled professionals.” Regarding the consequences of this crisis on the healthcare system, he said: “Given the current crisis and the lack of trust between nurses and the Ministry of Health, we are facing serious problems in the health system, and these issues may worsen in future crises.” Previously, the Secretary-General of the Nurses’ Home had reported patient deaths in Iranian hospitals due to a critical shortage of nurses. In November 2023, he announced that “over 3,000 nurses” leave Iran each year, yet according to him, the Ministry of Health does not recruit even that many to replenish the healthcare workforce. According to global healthcare benchmarks, there should be either three nurses for every 1,000 citizens, or two active nurses per hospital bed in the country’s healthcare system. Previous reports have indicated that Iran’s nursing workforce is only “half” of the minimum required standards for a functioning healthcare system.

Iranian Regime Foreign Minister: Iran Still Has Full Capacity to Rebuild Its Nuclear Program

Abbas Araghchi, the foreign minister of Iran’s regime, told Fox News that despite attacks by the United States and Israel, Iran still has the ability to rebuild its infrastructure and resume enrichment, since the necessary scientists, technology, and equipment are still available to Tehran. In the interview, Araghchi said buildings can be rebuilt and machinery replaced because they have technology. He added that, we have many scientists and technicians who previously worked at our facilities.” He also added that when and how enrichment will be resumed “depends on the circumstances.”
Grossi Warns of Consequences of Attacks on Iran’s Nuclear Facilities
These remarks come after the United States, in its June attacks, targeted three key nuclear sites in Iran. According to reports, Israel also destroyed most of the regime’s air defense systems, eliminated several senior military commanders, and killed at least 13 nuclear program operatives and hundreds of others. Israel has claimed that 30 senior security officials and 11 “top scientists” involved in the Iranian regime’s nuclear program were killed in these attacks. According to Fox News, U.S. officials have said the attacks caused significant damage to the Fordow and Natanz nuclear facilities, and that missiles fired at the Isfahan site have effectively disabled it. Washington claims these attacks have set the Iranian regime’s nuclear program back by several years. Araghchi, however, insists that Iran still possesses the technology and human resources to rebuild its nuclear program and is relying on domestic capabilities. He also demanded compensation from the U.S. for the damages, saying the Americans must explain why they attacked “in the middle of negotiations” and must provide guarantees that such behavior will not be repeated in future talks. Araghchi said that they must compensate for the damages. In another part of his interview with Fox News, Iran’s regime foreign minister Abbas Araghchi claimed that the recent attacks, known as the “12-Day War,” proved there is no military solution to halting Iran’s nuclear program. He also said these attacks have intensified internal calls within the regime to weaponize the nuclear program, though according to him, the regime still adheres to the two-decade-old religious decree (fatwa) by its Supreme Leader banning the production of nuclear weapons.
The Heavy Cost of Iran’s Nuclear Program
He reiterated that Iran will not back down from its right to enrich uranium for civilian purposes and declared, without enrichment, they have nothing. Uranium enrichment remains one of the central points of contention between the Iranian regime and the United States. Meanwhile, European countries have threatened to trigger the snapback mechanism if no progress is made in the negotiations. Under the terms of the JCPOA (Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action), the remaining signatories—France, the United Kingdom, Germany, China, and Russia—can activate this mechanism if they observe Iranian non-compliance. The United States, having exited the deal during Donald Trump’s presidency, currently does not have the authority to invoke this clause. At the same time, the United States has imposed new sanctions on the Iranian regime’s oil network and the drone division of its army. European diplomats have also been engaged in talks with Tehran in recent days to find ways to prevent the reactivation of United Nations sanctions—one proposed path being Iran’s full return to cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and the resumption of nuclear inspections. Araghchi warned that if Europe triggers the sanctions, Iran will halt negotiations, stating that “this would mean the end of the road.”

Rome Summit: Regime Change by the People Seen as Key to a Free Iran

0
On July 31, 2025, the Free Iran World Summit convened in Rome, uniting prominent political figures from Europe and the U.S. to address the deepening crisis in Iran. The summit was held shortly after the Iranian regime executed Mehdi Hassani and Behrouz Ehsani, members of the People’s Mojahedin Organization of Iran (PMOI/MEK). Their sacrifice became a central theme, symbolizing the regime’s growing desperation and the resilience of its opposition. Speakers condemned the regime’s brutality and emphasized its increasing reliance on repression. A consensus emerged around the “Third Option”—a strategy rejecting both foreign intervention and appeasement in favor of regime change by the Iranian people and their organized resistance.

Maryam Rajavi: A Clear Vision for a Democratic Iran

Maryam Rajavi, President-elect of the National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI), delivered the keynote, describing the recent executions as acts of fear, not strength. She emphasized the regime’s weakness and presented a roadmap for a secular, democratic, and non-nuclear republic. Rajavi denounced the regime’s history of crisis generation—from war to terrorism—and stressed that the current crisis is one of overthrow. She declared the only viable solution is the removal of the regime by the people and their resistance, arguing that it would ensure peace in the region. Firmly rejecting both clerical and monarchic dictatorships, Rajavi reiterated that the future lies not in returning to the past but in advancing toward a free and democratic Iran. She emphasized that the NCRI offers an organized alternative, committed to transferring sovereignty to the people through free elections.

Human Rights Abuses Under Global Scrutiny

Human rights abuses dominated much of the discussion. Stephen Rapp, former U.S. Ambassador, noted that Iran had carried out 700 executions in the first half of 2025, citing sham trials and torture-based confessions. Professor Javaid Rehman, former UN Special Rapporteur, condemned the secret executions of Hassani and Ehsani and warned of the regime’s potential for repeating the 1988 massacre, when 30,000 political prisoners were killed. He cited a July 7 editorial from Fars News, affiliated with the IRGC, that called the massacre a “successful experience,” a chilling sign of intent. Charles Michel, former President of the European Council, echoed the warning, calling for immediate international action. Nazli Afshar, a young Iranian-Italian, spoke emotionally of her uncle, executed during the 1988 massacre, highlighting the intergenerational trauma inflicted by the regime.

Support for the NCRI’s Ten-Point Plan

International figures praised NCRI’s Ten-Point Plan as a viable blueprint for Iran’s future. Former Italian PM Matteo Renzi affirmed that “regime change by the people of Iran and their Resistance” is the only way forward. Charles Michel labeled appeasement as “complicity,” calling the NCRI a democratic alternative and the Ten-Point Plan a foundation for a free republic. Former U.S. Ambassador Carla Sands and Italian economist Carlo Cottarelli also endorsed the plan, highlighting its commitment to gender equality, secularism, and a non-nuclear Iran.

The Resistance Units Inside Iran

Key attention was given to the PMOI’s Resistance Units operating inside Iran. Andrin Mohseni, a young Iranian from Switzerland, saluted their bravery in confronting state repression. These activists, he said, break the “barriers of fear” and keep the flame of resistance alive. Hans Ulrich Seidt, former German ambassador, described the Resistance Units as essential to undermining the regime from within, demonstrating that the opposition is both domestic and legitimate.

Exposing the Regime’s Propaganda

The summit also addressed the regime’s campaign to demonize the resistance. Ingrid Betancourt, former Colombian senator, spoke of her own experience with disinformation after supporting the PMOI. She argued the regime labels the resistance a “cult” to discredit a credible alternative. Charles Michel emphasized that the regime’s obsession with attacking the opposition proves its effectiveness and threat to its survival. Samira Ardalani noted that the regime attempts to tarnish the image of executed dissidents to avoid international backlash.

Rejection of Monarchy and Call to Designate IRGC

A strong stance was taken against restoring the monarchy. Senator Giulio Terzi, former Italian foreign minister, and Linda Chavez, former U.S. official, firmly opposed any return to Shah-era repression. Rudy Giuliani bluntly referred to the Shah’s son as the “son of a mass murderer,” arguing Iran deserves a true democratic republic. Speakers also called for the IRGC to be designated as a terrorist organization. Senator Terzi urged European governments to act, framing it as a key demand alongside recognizing the right to resist.

Final Message: The Future Belongs to the Iranian People

The Rome Summit concluded with a unified message: the Iranian regime is in its final phase, and only the people of Iran can determine its future. Former UK Foreign Secretary James Cleverly summed it up: leadership must come from within, not be imposed. The call was clear—no to war, no to appeasement, and yes to supporting the Iranian people and their organized resistance as they fight for freedom, democracy, and sovereignty.

Industry Struggles and Public Anger Grow Amid Water and Power Crisis in Iran

As the water and electricity crisis continues across the country, concerns are growing about its impact on the daily lives of citizens and the operations of production and industrial units. Criticism of the government of Masoud Pezeshkian, the Iranian regime’s president, has intensified due to its failure to contain the crisis. The state-run newspaper Ham-Mihan reported on Thursday, July 31, that the rationing and increased restrictions on water allocation to the industrial sector—intended to prioritize household needs—have fueled widespread concerns over the economic and social consequences of this approach.
Water Crisis in Iran: An Uncertain Future
The report stated: “Many industries and some refineries are facing shortages in water and electricity, which could lead to higher prices or even scarcity of energy products such as gasoline.” The state-run ILNA news agency also reported on July 31 about the “slowing of production due to power outages.” Mohammad Hamidi, secretary of the Electrical Engineering Companies Association of Golestan province, warned in an interview with ILNA that repeated power outages could lead to “reduced production, declining income, and eventually layoffs and worker unemployment.” He added that the current crisis has “caused serious problems for the people, farmers, and producers, because in today’s world, electricity is not only a basic commodity but also the lifeline of the economy and the most essential element of daily life.”

Pezeshkian Admits to a Severe Water Crisis in the Country

In recent days, many citizens and social media users have harshly criticized the regime’s government for failing to fulfill its previous promises to resolve the electricity and water crisis. Masoud Pezeshkian, president of the Iranian regime, acknowledged in a speech at the Water Planning Council in Zanjan on July 31: “Tomorrow, we may not have drinking water.” He called for an “austerity approach in resource consumption, both by officials and the people,” and added: “According to university and water researchers, all regulations have increased water consumption.” However, Pezeshkian did not clarify which institution within the regime’s power structure is responsible for implementing these reforms, nor did he indicate a timeline for resolving the water crisis if reforms are enacted. Ahad Vazifeh, head of Iran’s National Drought Center, warned in an interview with the state-run news website Rouydad24 on July 31 of the imminent likelihood that the country could enter a state of “water misery.”

Public Protests Against Power Outages

Videos posted on social media show citizens in Golshahr (Karaj), Parand, and Shahr-e-Rey protesting repeated power outages by chanting slogans against Ali Khamenei, the supreme leader of the Iranian regime. In these videos, slogans such as “Death to Khamenei” and “Death to the dictator” can be heard.

Mai Sato Condemns Iran’s Amputation Sentences for Three Prisoners

Mai Sato, the United Nations Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Iran, posted a short message on her X (formerly Twitter) account, calling the amputation of three prisoners at Urmia prison a clear example of “violation of fundamental human rights” and strongly condemned it. She stated: “According to received information, yesterday the amputation sentences for Messrs. Hadi Rostami, Mehdi Sharafian, and Mehdi Shahivand were carried out.” These three prisoners had been sentenced by the court to the amputation of four fingers from their right hand. According to human rights reports, the sentence was carried out on the night of Wednesday, July 30, using a “guillotine” device in the central prison of Urmia. This punishment was carried out in the presence of judicial officials, including the prison warden and the deputy prosecutor. After the prisoners received local anesthetic injections and underwent the amputations, they were returned to the prison intake ward with only basic bandaging and without full medical treatment. In response to this act, Mai Sato described it as “state-sanctioned mutilation” and emphasized that corporal punishments such as amputation are “forms of torture, cruel, inhuman, and degrading treatment.” She added that under international law, including Article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, “they are absolutely prohibited and no exceptions are allowed.” The three men were arrested in August 2017 on charges of “theft” and were sentenced to amputation in November 2019 by Branch One of the Criminal Court for Juveniles. This act has triggered a wave of criticism and concern among human rights organizations and civil society activists both inside Iran and abroad. Gholamhossein Mohseni Ejei, the head of Iran’s regime judiciary, announced on December 7, 2024, that despite both domestic and international pressure on the regime, the highest number of hand amputation sentences in the past three years had been carried out in Iran. Ejei, who is regarded as one of the prominent violators of human rights in Iran, at the time described amputation as “a decree issued by God” and added that this punishment continues to be enforced in Iran despite pressure from various organizations. The issuance and enforcement of amputation sentences in Iran are in clear contradiction with the fundamental principles of human rights, including human dignity. This is despite the fact that Iran is a signatory to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights—an international treaty that explicitly prohibits cruel, inhuman, or degrading punishments. The sentence of amputation is undoubtedly one of these types of punishments, and its implementation constitutes a direct violation of the principle of preserving human dignity—a principle that forms the foundation of many international human rights instruments. Iran’s regime is among the few governments that continue to use amputation sentences for certain crimes and, unlike many other countries, has not joined the United Nations Convention Against Torture. Despite repeated appeals from international human rights bodies to end such punishments, Iran’s regime continues to issue and enforce sentences such as flogging and amputation of limbs—sentences that are contrary to human rights standards and a cause for serious concern within the global community.

Hunger Strike of Political Prisoners in Ghezel Hesar Prison Enters Sixth Day

Hunger strike in solitary confinement in protest against repression and executions The collective hunger strike by political prisoners in Ghezel Hesar Prison has entered its sixth day. Despite being under extremely harsh conditions and intense pressure in solitary confinement, they continue to resist the wave of executions, forced transfers, and violent repression. The hunger strike, which began on July 26, is a response to the brutal raid by special guard forces on Hall 4, the beating of inmates, their forced transfer to solitary cells, and the secret execution of two political prisoners, Mehdi Hassani and Behrouz Ehsani Eslamloo.
Iran’s Regime Executes Political Prisoners Mehdi Hassani and Behrouz Ehsani
These two prisoners were active supporters of the “No to Execution Tuesdays” campaign and were accused of being members of the People’s Mojahedin Organization of Iran (PMOI/MEK). Their death sentences were carried out without the process of a fair trial and without informing their families. Judicial officials have even refused to reveal the location of their burial—a pattern previously observed in the cases of other executed political prisoners.
79th Week of ‘No to Executions Tuesdays’ Held in 48 Prisons Following Execution of Mehdi Hassani and Behrouz Ehsani

Coordinated repression aimed at breaking resistance inside the prison

According to reports, on Saturday, more than 100 security agents from the prison guard, the IRGC Intelligence Organization, and other suppression units raided the political prisoners’ ward. The inmates were shackled, blindfolded with black hoods, and transferred to solitary confinement cells. At the same time, Saeed Masouri—a prominent figure in this protest campaign—was exiled to Zahedan Prison after 25 years of incarceration.
Systematic Human Rights Violations and a Threat to Saeed Masouri’s Life After 25 Years of Imprisonment
It appears that this crackdown is part of a broader regime plan to silence the growing voice of opposition to executions within the prisons. The “No to Execution” campaign has continued for over 79 weeks in 48 prisons across the country and has now become one of the most serious protest movements within the judicial system.

Hunger strike: silent protest inside locked cells

The political prisoners of Ghezel Hesar, currently held in Unit 3 solitary cells, continue their hunger strike under extremely harsh conditions. They are deprived of family contact, medical services, fresh air, and basic human rights. According to one of their close contacts, the physical condition of some strikers has been reported as critical. However, prison officials have not only failed to take any action but are actively trying to conceal the hunger strike and censor related news.

Deadly silence from the judiciary

The regime not only refuses to respond to the protests but continues its path of repression more intensely by deliberately hiding the prisoners’ conditions, perpetuating the psychological torment of their families, and denying the legal rights of the inmates. The families of Mehdi Hassani and Behrouz Ehsani have repeatedly contacted judicial authorities to learn about the fate of their loved ones but have been met with complete silence.

U.S. Imposes Largest Sanctions Package Against Iranian Regime’s Shipping Industry

In what it described as the most severe wave of sanctions against Iran’s oil and shipping sectors since 2018, the U.S. Department of the Treasury sanctioned more than 115 individuals, entities, and vessels. A significant portion of these sanctions target the shipping network operated by Mohammad Hossein Shamkhani, the son of Ali Shamkhani, senior adviser to regime supreme leader Ali Khamenei. According to the Treasury Department’s statement, Mohammad Hossein Shamkhani exploited his father’s influence to establish a complex network of shell companies, vessels, and foreign passports that he used to transfer oil, petroleum products, and other cargo from Iran and Russia to global buyers—earning tens of billions of dollars annually. The sanctions list includes companies based in the UAE, Switzerland, Turkey, Cyprus, Singapore, Panama, the Marshall Islands, Saint Vincent, and Liberia. The network uses clandestine tactics and money laundering methods to conceal its ties to Tehran and Moscow.
EU Sanctions Hossein Shamkhani: A Blow to the Oil and Weapons Network of Iran’s Regime and Russia
The U.S. State Department, via its Persian-language platform, wrote that the Shamkhani family has used black-market wealth to purchase luxury properties around the world and even acquired Dominica passports through large-scale investments to conceal their travel and connections. In a statement, U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said the Shamkhani family’s shipping empire demonstrates how regime operatives exploit their positions to amass vast wealth and finance the Iranian regime’s dangerous behavior.

Sanctions package targets 115 entities and individuals

Bessent added that the more than 115 sanctions imposed constitute the largest action since the launch of the U.S. maximum pressure campaign against Iran under President Donald Trump. These measures aim to target regime operatives who profit while Tehran continues to threaten U.S. national security—placing American interests as the top priority. However, Iranian regime foreign ministry spokesperson Esmail Baghaei condemned the sanctions as “illegal and oppressive,” claiming they are a “clear sign of U.S. hostility” and amount to “crimes against humanity” and “a blow to the welfare of the Iranian people.” With the latest round, the number of Iranian individuals, entities, and vessels sanctioned by the United States this year has surpassed 500.

Italian Senate Majority Supports Iran’s Resistance, Urges IRGC Terror Designation and Embassy Closures

A majority of Italian Senators have issued a forceful statement denouncing Iran’s clerical regime over a sharp rise in executions, particularly of political prisoners. The declaration highlights that since President Pezeshkian assumed office ten months ago, at least 1,200 executions have been carried out. Many of those targeted, it notes, are opposition activists—especially members of the People’s Mojahedin Organization of Iran (PMOI/MEK). In the final months of 2024 alone, nine political prisoners affiliated with the PMOI were reportedly sentenced to death. The statement was endorsed by a broad cross-party coalition, including one serving minister, two former ministers, Senate floor leaders, committee chairs, and numerous vice-chairs. It condemns what it describes as a systematic campaign of arbitrary arrests, torture, and politically motivated death sentences aimed at suppressing dissent. The signatories emphasize: “Standing with the Iranian people in their demand for regime change is both the correct policy and a moral imperative.” The Senate majority expressed its support for the Ten-Point Plan put forward by Maryam Rajavi, the President-elect of the National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI). Her proposal envisions the creation of a secular, democratic republic founded on gender equality, the abolition of the death penalty, and a non-nuclear Iran. Calling for “concrete and decisive action” from democratic governments, the Senators stressed that backing the Iranian people’s pursuit of freedom and justice is essential to achieving long-term peace and security in the region.
  • Condemning the surge in executions, particularly of political prisoners, and calling attention to at least 1,200 executions in just ten months.
  • Backing Maryam Rajavi’s Ten-Point Plan for a secular, democratic, non-nuclear Iran with equal rights and abolition of the death penalty.
  • Listing the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) as a terrorist organization in Europe, describing it as “long overdue.”
  • Closing Iranian regime embassies implicated in terrorism and repression abroad.
The statement outlines several key measures and concludes that firm international engagement is necessary placing the Iranian people, their organized resistance, and the broader demand for democratic change at the heart of any principled approach to Iran.

Macroeconomic Imbalances in Iran Reach Critical Levels

In recent years, Iran’s economy has faced profound challenges that can be summed up in one word: “imbalance.” These imbalances—described by some as a form of “bankruptcy”—have manifested in various sectors, from natural resources like water to energy infrastructure and financial markets.

Water Bankruptcy: A Sign of Resource Imbalance

One of the clearest signs of imbalance in Iran is the dire state of its water resources. Kaveh Madani, head of the United Nations University Institute for Water, Environment and Health, calls the situation not a crisis, but “water bankruptcy.” He argues that a crisis implies a solvable condition, whereas Iran has moved beyond that point and reached an irreversible state. Water rationing in some regions and the severe depletion of water sources are visible signs of this bankruptcy. It is the result of years of mismanagement of water resources, overexploitation of underground reserves, and neglect of environmental sustainability.
Iran’s Economy in Crisis: Investment Collapse and Soaring Inflation

Roots of Economic Imbalance: Delusion and Miscalculation

Vahid Shaqaqi-Shahri, a state-affiliated economist, believes that Iran’s macroeconomic imbalances stem from abandoning rationality and wisdom in governance. He argues that populist policymaking, unrealistic delusions, and detachment from economic realities—combined with decades of sanctions—have brought Iran’s economy to its current state. These imbalances have resulted from flawed policies such as price controls, preferential currency handouts, and extensive government interference in the economy. Such approaches, reminiscent of failed experiences in countries like Cuba and Venezuela, have led to a sharp decline in investment, decaying infrastructure, and depletion of resources. The 2010s were a decade of stagflation for Iran’s economy, with an average inflation rate of 27% and economic growth below 1%.

Energy Imbalance and Its Impact on the Private Sector

One of the primary victims of Iran’s macroeconomic imbalances is the private sector, especially critical industries like steel and cement. Unprecedented power outages—which began even before the summer—have severely disrupted production in these sectors. Electricity supply to some industrial units has dropped by 80% to 90%, resulting in halted production lines and reduced work shifts. These restrictions have not only diminished productivity but have also caused serious damage to machinery and the financial structures of these units. The energy imbalance, which in 2024 extended even into the spring, deprived industries of the opportunity to compensate for lost production during non-peak seasons. This situation, coupled with the lack of coordination between the Ministry of Industry and Mining and the Ministry of Energy, has placed the private sector under even greater pressure. For example, signed agreements intended to manage electricity restrictions have been violated, and promises of improved conditions have remained merely words.

Financial Markets and Investment Imbalance

Mehran Fathi, a capital market expert, highlights the imbalances in Iran’s financial markets. Chronic inflation—with an official rate of over 32%—and a 60% increase in the free-market exchange rate have severely reduced investors’ purchasing power. A negative real interest rate (around -10%) has rendered bank deposits unprofitable, pushing investors toward alternative markets such as gold, foreign currency, and real estate. The stock market has also underperformed, with the main index growing by only 19% to 23%, and the equal-weight index by just 7% to 9%, reflecting the gap between large export-driven corporations and smaller firms. Gold and coins have delivered the highest returns—over 100%—but this success stems from inflationary concerns and a deep lack of trust in the national currency. The fixed-income market, too, has suffered from negative real returns and has failed to keep up with inflation.

Imbalance in the Rationality of Delusional Rulers

Iran’s macroeconomic imbalances—from water bankruptcy to energy crisis and financial market instability—are the product of years of mismanagement, destructive economic policies, and the economic irrationality of the Iranian regime’s officials. These imbalances have not only worn-down economic infrastructure but also eroded trust in policymaking and the business environment. A lack of institutional coordination, short-term decision-making, and disregard for structural reforms have brought Iran’s economy to the brink of one of its most difficult decades. These conditions—marked by chronic inflation, stagflation, and declining investment—reflect the depth of a crisis that has surfaced from the underlying layers of the economy and can no longer be concealed.

Water Crisis in Iran: An Uncertain Future

Iran, a country with an ancient civilization that has long struggled with water scarcity, now stands on the brink of a full-scale water crisis. This crisis is not merely the result of natural factors—it is clearly the outcome of decades of mismanagement, poor governance, and inaction at the highest levels of the regime. While neighboring countries along the Persian Gulf—with much drier climates—have contained this crisis through investment in technology and careful planning, Iran, despite its vast oil and gas wealth and previously abundant water resources, has today turned into a mirage in the desert. A review of Iran’s development plans over the past decades reveals that water issues, instead of being prioritized, were consistently sidelined in policymaking. Inaction and lack of foresight regarding this vital resource have far-reaching consequences. While many countries around the world are moving toward integrated and sustainable water resource management, Iran remains mired in basic challenges such as water loss due to outdated infrastructure and an irrigation system that has not been modernized. Agriculture, which consumes nearly 90% of the country’s water, continues to rely on traditional and inefficient methods, while serious plans for transitioning to modern, water-efficient agriculture have rarely been implemented. The regime’s support for water-intensive industries without considering environmental concerns, or requiring them to adopt water-recycling technologies, is another example of this mismanagement. Beyond the lack of investment in modern technologies, the absence of a national vision and long-term strategy for managing this vital resource in Iran is glaring. Short-term, fragmented decision-making without regard for long-term consequences has only worsened the crisis.
Water And Electricity Supply Crisis; Efforts for the Rapid Transfer of Water to Tehran
The absence of a strong, centralized authority capable of coordinating all stakeholders and implementing comprehensive plans is another major weakness. The division of responsibilities among numerous institutions without sufficient coordination has led to confusion and overlapping duties, effectively preventing the execution of large-scale initiatives. Many cities across Iran experience repeated water cuts during the summer. Villages have dried up, and farmers have been forced to migrate. This situation not only has wide-reaching economic and social consequences but also has fueled public dissatisfaction and eroded trust in the regime’s management system.

Iran’s Water Crisis Is a Crisis of Governance and Political Will

Iran’s water crisis is, more than anything, a result of mismanagement and a lack of political will rather than a natural phenomenon. Over the years, there were numerous opportunities to adopt necessary measures and invest in infrastructure and modern technologies—opportunities that were simply squandered. In some provinces, even water transfer projects have failed due to a lack of proper technical and environmental assessments. People have taken to the streets to voice their demands, but Iran’s regime has consistently chosen repression over accountability. Today, the people of Iran—who could have been spared this crisis through proper use of national wealth and sound management—are left chasing the illusion of water during the scorching summer. This is a bitter reminder of how incompetence and lack of foresight by a ruling system can drag a country, despite all its potential, into catastrophe. One of the most painful images of the water crisis is that of people standing in long lines for water under the blazing summer sun—citizens of a country rich in energy resources but deprived of their most basic need. This contradiction can only be explained by the words “incompetence” and “systemic corruption.” Instead of using oil revenues to build water infrastructure, Iran’s regime has funneled them into regional interventions, domestic repression, and institutionalized corruption.